Discuss When is supplementary bonding not required ? Tails not on rcd... in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

tomodo

-
Reaction score
7
Hi all, im installing a new consumer unit in a bungalow , customer wanted it moving from bathroom to hallway. The system is a tns system and the meter tails are around 7 meters long, now because of this i have installed a 80 amp switch fuse inside the meter box and the tails run from this up the cavity ( around a meter or so ) and over the top of the loft joists. Because this circuit is not on an rcd am i now required to install supplementary bonding? The cavity the tails run up is one of the bathroom walls but tails do not run over the top of bathroom. Thought about putting a 100ma time delayed rcd in aswell but dont think this would count as additional protection as its not 30ma and would struggle to fit in meter box .

Thanks
 
Hi all, im installing a new consumer unit in a bungalow , customer wanted it moving from bathroom to hallway. The system is a tns system and the meter tails are around 7 meters long, now because of this i have installed a 80 amp switch fuse inside the meter box and the tails run from this up the cavity ( around a meter or so ) and over the top of the loft joists. Because this circuit is not on an rcd am i now required to install supplementary bonding? The cavity the tails run up is one of the bathroom walls but tails do not run over the top of bathroom. Thought about putting a 100ma time delayed rcd in aswell but dont think this would count as additional protection as its not 30ma and would struggle to fit in meter box .

Thanks
I think you are over thinking it :santa_cheesy:
 
Lol things do play on my mind alot
The cables go up the cavity so are at a depth >50mm, are clipped to the top of the joists In the loft, don enter or pass through the bathroom so I don't see any reason for RCD protection unless the earthing arrangement is TT? Although the tails passing up the cavity isn't ideal some times you don't have much choice and have had to use the method myself in the past just advise the customer not to have the cavity filled with insulation.
 
wot he just said. ^^^^^^. no need for RCD on the tails .
 

Reply to When is supplementary bonding not required ? Tails not on rcd... in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello Need to replace a distribution board in the next few weeks to allow for more circuits to be installed in January. Existing is a TT system...
Replies
6
Views
1K
8.5K shower unit is wired to plastic box consumer unit to 30 amp cartridge fuse with no RCD It’s the original shower installed when the house was...
Replies
19
Views
4K
Hi all, I am looking for some advice regarding old rewireable (3036) fuse boards in regards to additions and alterations. I am an electrician and...
Replies
28
Views
4K
Recently visited a new build to do a very minor job and spotted a few dodgy looking items so Client asked me to do an EICR. Following items I...
Replies
6
Views
925
Hello All, new to the forum. Would be grateful for advice on whether the following proposal is an acceptable solution or open to any suggestions...
Replies
9
Views
5K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock