D
davesparks
The intent of Regulation 421.1.201 is considered to be, as far as is reasonably practicable, to contain any fire within the enclosure or cabinet and to minimise the escape of flames.
The non-combustible enclosure or cabinet must provide a complete envelope (e.g. base, cover, door and any components such as hinges, screws and catches) as necessary to maintain fire containment. All blanks, circuit-breakers and other devices must be contained within the non-combustible enclosure or cabinet.
It is important for the installer to seal all openings into the enclosure or cabinet for cables, conduits, trunking or ducting that remain after the installation of cables.
The intent of the sealing is that, as far as is reasonably practicable, any fire is contained within the enclosure or cabinet and the escape of flames to the surroundings of the cabinet or enclosure or into conduits trunking or ducting is minimised, as intended by Regulation 421.1.201.
Good workmanship and proper materials must be used, and account must be taken of the manufacturer’s relevant instructions, if any.
Who is considering that to be the intent of the regulation? Have they mentioned how long the fire should be contained within the enclosure? What does containing a fire as far as reasonably practicable achieve? Surely it's either going to contain it or not, an enclosure which is fully sealed apart from a little hole which was not 'practicable' isn't going to contain a fire at all.
Are they going to stop fitting any knockouts in the enclosures? Because the usual knockouts will just pop themselves open if there is a fire inside that box!
If that is the 'intent' of the regulation then why the hell haven't the IET printed that in the book? Are we supposed to be mind readers to work out what the regulations were supposed to say regardless of what has been printed in the book?
What an absoloute joke!