Currently reading:
Poor install EICR 12 year old hotel

Discuss Poor install EICR 12 year old hotel in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

conrad

-
Reaction score
31
Carrying out an eicr. Thoughts on these DBs installed in each room. Around 20 have been installed in this manner with no gland on the supply SWA and the top surface of the DB completely removed.
Note the plasterboard hole is small in this image compared to some.
What do you think other than replacing baring in mind the rcbos for this DB can be £100 alone. Paxolin to slide in etc? Time. Shame for the customer who has had this poor installation.
15466098772531807210984.jpg
15466099287081870504917.jpg

I have noted as C2 for a number of different reasons. As follows if you wish to read.
522.8.5.
The SWA cable entering the DB has no gland fitted. C2
701.411.3.3
Circuits passing through and supplying accessories in loaction containing bath/shower not provided with RCD protection. C3
527.2.1
Large Hole not made good in plaster board above DB to prevent the spread of fire. C2
411.3.3
No RCD protection on socket outlets, commercial premesis. C2 (Fridge Socket)
522.6.202
No RCD protection for cables buried in the walls. C3
416.2.2
Top surface of Distribution Board has been removed. The integrity of the DB has not been maintained during installation. ip4x not maintained. C2.

15466099609611453904172.jpg
 
Note 2: This regulation precludes, for example, the use of non-metallic cable clips or cable ties as the sole means of support where cables are clipped direct to exposed surfaces or suspended under cable tray, and the use of non-metallic cable as the sole means of support of the cables therein.

Note 3: Suitably spaced steel or copper clips. Saddles or ties are examples that will meet the requirements of this regulation

Metal clips/supports fixing pvc cables inside a plastic trunking wiring system are one way to comply with this regulation.
Not the only way but one way nevertheless.
Quite suitable for retro fitting on existing installations.
 
I’ve been installing metal cable ties every third tie on upside down and vertical tray since before I can remember.
Again where in the Regulation does it state metal clips are required in plastic trunking?
Of course you have!
That is not the discussion tho is it?
The point is that it was not a requirement of the regulations no matter how much you spin it!
 
From the 18th:
521.10.202 Wiring systems shall be supported such that they will not be liable to premature collapse in the event of a fire.
NOTE 1: Wiring systems hanging across access or egress routes may hinder evacuation and firefighting activities.
NOTE 2: Cables installed in or on steel cable containment systems are deemed to meet the requirements of this regulation.
NOTE 3: This regulation precludes, for example, the use of non-metallic cable clips or cable ties as the sole means of support where cables are clipped direct to exposed surfaces or suspended under cable tray, and the use of non-metallic cable trunking as the sole means of support of the cables therein.
NOTE 4: Suitably spaced steel or copper clips, saddles or ties are examples that will meet the requirements of this regulation.
 
Taking all things wrong with the install into consideration i say C2.
Tha angle which swa enters means that the connections are under stress.
Theres alot of dust inside the consumer units due to the large hole. Theres a draft so anything could enter it etc insualtion...
I believe c2 also for the lack of rcd protection due to them being in a commercial premesis and not being used for fridges in all cases also not labelled and no RA.
I stick to my original coding.

We have a problem here. That which is wrong by todays standards was acceptable by previous standards.
As I've stated already the regs are not retrospective. That would suggest another method of recording any inadequacies.
To say that it is dangerous would imply that the previous regulations were in fact wrong. As far as your coding is concerned, I think you should take it up with the JPEL/64 committee.
 
We have a problem here. That which is wrong by todays standards was acceptable by previous standards.
As I've stated already the regs are not retrospective. That would suggest another method of recording any inadequacies.
To say that it is dangerous would imply that the previous regulations were in fact wrong. As far as your coding is concerned, I think you should take it up with the JPEL/64 committee.

As i stated. My coding is all inline with the napit codebreaker book which for me is a good reference point.
 

Reply to Poor install EICR 12 year old hotel in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top