Search the forum,

Discuss Not sure why I'm asking, but..... in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

polo1

-
Arms
Reaction score
633
EICR, Tns supply, 60A fuse. 16mm tails, Main earth 10mm, gas & water bonds 6mm. Code 2?
Guess it's the fact that the supplier's earth to the MET is only 10mm that's making me feel the Code 2 is harsh!
 
Last edited:
can't see any reason for a code at all.

I'm fairly new to this side of things, but shoving my face in whenever possible to try and learn. My thoughts are a 16mm cable will carry 87A clipped direct which is more than enough for the 60A fuse. Table 54.7 says that a 16mm line conductor needs a 16mm protective conductor, but it's also possible to calculate the required size (but since we don't know the prospective fault current I can't have a pop at working this out). Then looking at 544.1.1 for the main bonding, this states that 6mm is fine where not PME conditions.

So assuming the adiabatic checks out, I'm with Tel - what is the reason for any code?

(P.S. If I've gone wrong somewhere, happy to be corrected :) )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yikes, I'm glad I asked! I've completely "mis-remembered" Reg 544.1.1. As you have all said, no reason for any Code. Adiabatic calls for 6mm (first standard size for unprotected conductor) so the 10/6mm are fine.
I must spend more time re-reading the Big Yellow:dunce2:
 
one has to try these days. getting cynical in my old age.
 
I'm fairly new to this side of things, but shoving my face in whenever possible to try and learn. My thoughts are a 16mm cable will carry 87A clipped direct which is more than enough for the 60A fuse. Table 54.7 says that a 16mm line conductor needs a 16mm protective conductor, but it's also possible to calculate the required size (but since we don't know the prospective fault current I can't have a pop at working this out). Then looking at 544.1.1 for the main bonding, this states that 6mm is fine where not PME conditions.

So assuming the adiabatic checks out, I'm with Tel - what is the reason for any code?

(P.S. If I've gone wrong somewhere, happy to be corrected :) )

Don't need to know the PFC to conduct the adiabatic equation.
Just use the tabulated values in BS7671.
 

Reply to Not sure why I'm asking, but..... in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock