New sockets in workshop

[Fireblade]

Hi All

First post, so hope it's in the right place and I've followed all the rules...!!

Been asked to quote on a job which in the workshop of a car dealership. Job is to provide x2 new socket outlets. Original installation has numerous three phase DB's, not to mention all the steel conduit throughout the workshop for all the obvious reasons.

My thoughts are to avoid having to fit new steel conduit but to run 2.5mm 2 core SWA (utilising armour as CPC) from an existing switched double socket to a new switched FCU and then feed x2 double sockets as a radial from the new FCU again in 2.5mm SWA with the amour utilised as the CPC.

Any thoughts/comments

Cheers

 

[robsparx]

That sounds fine to me except I'd use 3 core swa, using one of the cores as the earth.

And do you know what they're plugging into the sockets? If the 2 sockets have a limit of 13A, that might not be enough for what they're being used for

 

[Hawk81]

As long as the sockets are rcd protected then all sounds good to me and welcomE to the forum!

 

[robsparx]

Oh yes and what he said ^^^. Probably the most important part lol

 

[Adam W]

Welcome to the forum!

Would it be possible just to extend the rings in steel conduit so it's in keeping with the original installation?

 

[bugsy]

As prev stated 3c swa S/O c/w 30m/a RCD,s - welcomevto the forum

 

[telectrix]

as said before, prefer use 3 core, but must earth armour as well. as the cable itself does't need RCD protection, you could use 2 twin RCDsockets, thus increasing the load capacity. instead of the FCU.

 

[nickblake]

Welcome to the forum , It would be nicer in steel conduit as has been said , but SWA in 3 core with RCD protection shouldnt be a problem test existing conduit to ensure earth continuity ,Galve through box terminate SWA there connect earths ,run to sockets SWA protected by Conduit connection ,jobs a good un

 

[Hawk81]

as said before, prefer use 3 core, but must earth armour as well. as the cable itself does't need RCD protection, you could use 2 twin RCDsockets, thus increasing the load capacity. instead of the FCU.

Surely the FCU will still be needed to stop the spur being a spur off a spur. I too would use 3 core swa.

 

[telectrix]

Surely the FCU will still be needed to stop the spur being a spur off a spur. I too would use 3 core swa.

don't think the OP mentioned existing circuit was a ring final. i assumed it was a radial.

 

[Hawk81]

don't think the OP mentioned existing circuit was a ring final. i assumed it was a radial.

I assumed it was a ring and that was why the op was fitting an FCU.

 

[telectrix]

in fact, we should never assume .capt. edward smith assumed the titanic was unsinkable., look where that got him.

 

[Hawk81]

in fact, we should never assume .capt. edward smith assumed the titanic was unsinkable., look where that got him.

Very true!

 

[telectrix]

actually, it would be logical for it to be a ring.. as a radial, unless in 6mm would be pretty useless in a garage workshop, due to the loads required.

 

[Hawk81]

actually, it would be logical for it to be a ring.. as a radial, unless in 6mm would be pretty useless in a garage workshop, due to the loads required.

True maybe the op will tell us which it is. My money is on ring.