Currently reading:
Overcoming the problems with working at height

Discuss Overcoming the problems with working at height in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

JD6400

-
Mentor
Arms
Reaction score
742
What access gear do others use when working at height , and how high would you deem it safe to still work from a ladder ?
Also whats the worst case of daft and dangerous behaviour that you have come across by other people working at height .:38:
 
alarm

Im using it as an example - profit does come into it partly


bottom line you have to do everything as far as reasonably practicable to ensure the safety of yourself and those working for you

Using profit alone is not a good reason at all!

And using I had to charge that to get the job is not either!

so to get the jobs you downgrade the ra's to beat the price of a contractor who ra's state xyz and who's costs are added to the price..id say 'reasonably practicable/profitable wouldnt hold up in court..'couldnt afford it your honour' job went over,its no defence
 
I think you are all getting the wrong end of this

It comes partly into it.

Yes it was a bad example and I should of found another


Either way a risk assessment will tell you how far you have to take something and what you have to do to ensure the safety of yourself/staff
 
Many years ago, before I acquired any sense, I was working at a chemical works and we needed to get a bit of heavy equipment down from the third floor (each one about 20ft high). So I climb a ladder up to a 4" beam about 15ft above the floor of the third floor and sit on it so I can inch along to the bit over an opening in the floor (about 10ft sq, no barriers). So I am now about 75ft above the ground, inside the building. I tie a sling around the beam and then I am thrown a rope from the solid bit of the third floor, I use this to pull up a chain block which I fit to the sling. I then inch back along the beam to the ladder and climb down. No harness, no health and safety.

These days I get nervous on my small step ladders.

It was on the same job while putting a boiler in place by hand (about 10 ton) that the foreman nodded in the direction of the laggers and said they will be luck to get to 40 years old with the asbestos they are using.
 
I had to laugh wryly when, on my IPAF course the trainer asks us to put our harness on.

Being the shy retiring type I says meekly, "Hold on, we paid good money for this, would it be at all possible for you to show us the correct procedure please..?"

"Nope" says he, "thats another course you need"

And he made me look ugly in my photo.
 
This is what really got to me , four different courses for the different classes and the another for your harness then the insurance then the emergency recuse gear then the multiple checks and inspections to do before you even get of the ground and heaven forbid if it is not all in order because they will still crucify you anyway , might as well send em up a piece of bamboo to do the job as you will still get nailed the same if it goes wrong !
 
Talking of emergency rescue, toxic shock etc, them that walk past, taking flash photographs when youve got your hand in live trunking or asking you to put your lid on when your squeezed between services then blithely walk past a boom in use with no key in the ground control.
 
A risk assessment also must include cost - as far as reasonably practicable.

This is the first time I have ever heard that cost is a factor in a risk assessment, I can see it now on the RA Hazard = not enough profit!! control measure = Quote properly to take account of H&S requirements unless you are prepared to cut corners

If a customer is only paying you £300 to do a job which generates £100 profit for the company and a scissor lift costs £100 it is not as far as reasonably practicable to hire one in
However if it costs £25 per day and you say I need to make at least £150 on every job - apart from you not making that in the first place that is not considered as an excuse!

If the control measures to reduce the risk of the hazard occurring to a minimum dictate the use of a MEWP then that is what is required regardless of cost unless there are other mitigating circumstances that preclude the use of a MEWP like no access for one then the next best alternative should be used

3 years delivering these courses to people who inspect people like ourselves who have fallen off said equipment and ladders - you pic up some stories and the outcome of them

Falling off things is not something I've tried


The law states that you as the employer must do everything as far as reasonably practicable to protect those who work for you and those who may be around as a result of your work activities

IT DOES NOT STATE YOU MUST DO THIS COURSE AND THIS AND THIS

That is a recommendation (ONLY) in the approved code of practice and then they dont say you must do this and this!

Courses are a control measure that can be used to reduce the risk factor. They also fulfil the employers responsibility of providing adequate training for the task


Your insurance are the only ones who can say you must do a course as they are covering you - yet again you can always change insurance companies

I don't think you are correct on this one, if a site deems you need to have completed a specific course or courses before you can gain access the you will have to do the course(s)

Same goes for equipment you use.

I would think that it would be reasonable for an insurance company to specify a type of equipment to use but to specify a particular manufacturer would be a no no unless an equal and approved alternative was acceptable

I think you are all getting the wrong end of this

It comes partly into it.

Yes it was a bad example and I should of found another


Either way a risk assessment will tell you how far you have to take something and what you have to do to ensure the safety of yourself/staff

Not sure what end of the stick I've got!!! , as stated previously a lack of profit while it is a job hazard it has no place on an RA IMO

If I come on tomorrow (as its my birthday)
I will provide a sample risk assessment that will get past HSE for the use of a ladder - otherwise I will do it on Tuesday

I look forward to it
 
Last edited:
I had to laugh wryly when, on my IPAF course the trainer asks us to put our harness on.

Being the shy retiring type I says meekly, "Hold on, we paid good money for this, would it be at all possible for you to show us the correct procedure please..?"

"Nope" says he, "thats another course you need"

And he made me look ugly in my photo.

When I did my IPAF I refused the harness provided and used my own as they had no inspection log for the harness and it only had a rear attachment point having read up on suspension trauma and it's effect on the body I would not like to hang face down in a harness for to long
 
There are harnesses, and there are harnesses. I loathe the commonly found 'single strap' ones with shoulder point, about as much use as a chocolate fireguard for working in, all right for having some 'emotional support' for those in a basket but not much else. Sports/climbing harnesses are a big no-no, too.

Pricey, but I use a Navaho, which is all wide and padded like a sports harness but designed for full industrial access. You can quite comfortably suspend/abseil/attach yourself for hours on end with no real ill effect. You can even have a pee without taking it off (if you're careful!). And I never attach from the shoulder point out of choice, you can't self rescue if you're hanging face down. The Nav has a mid chest point that means if you did go then you're still upright but facing in a useful direction and able to see, and if unlucky enough to be unconscious then it's still easy enough to be rescued by others as there's three more structural attachment points.

Right - time for me to go and put it on!

Oh and UNG - my IPAF photo makes me look like I've just escaped from Broadmoor, so I wouldn't worry!!!!
 
I will start off the first daft and dangerous one , It was in a very tall grain store and i caught some operatives installing 6ft twin flurries using a JCB lodall on full boom extension with a set of triple gang ladders on full extension out of its grain bucket and just resting against the top of the ladders on a 12" purling at the top , it had one them in the loadall with his foot on the brake as i think the hand brake was shot !

Forgot to mention that there was two cherry pickers on site sitting idle at the time ????
I work in a grain store and use a telehandler with a remote control basket etc and full harness kit,this machine was bought for use in day to day but big enough to reach anywhere for electrical work(i have a decent boss) however I went to another farm to change some lamps on 15m columns and they only had an 8 m telehandler with a gage pallet,guy says to strap an extention ladder to machine, I told him to **** off and do it himself. Anyone guess the first word?and then he thought I was being difficult.
 
Worst I've seen is scissor lift extended to full length, extension ladders out of that for around another 4-5M to the ceiling. Have seen and worked with others that have used tray & basket runs for their access platform, even though its 9M+ up! One missing bracket and from that height its lights out.

I've a fear of heights, that is even more the case when I'm not totally in control. Anything above what my extension ladders can reach I'd really rather not be near it. If cherry picker or scaffold supplied not so big a problem - pretty sure my Insurance is only up to 10M and felt that good enough as I have no plans to go any higher!

Good on you D80,I also have a fear of heights after a bad fall in my younger days,and I get so sick off people taking the mick nice to find someone else in the same boat and not afraid to admit it.
 
When I did my IPAF I refused the harness provided and used my own as they had no inspection log for the harness and it only had a rear attachment point having read up on suspension trauma and it's effect on the body I would not like to hang face down in a harness for to long


Hmmm, Ive got a feeling that despite £250 worth of training, paying attention to webbing, in date coding and no twisted straps Im still at risk.

Thanks for highlighting this.

Everyone Ive used has had the attachment middle of shoulder blades, time for some more reading.
 
As the OP was asking about using a ladder

ACF3DB.jpg
Not sure about the risk assessment though
 

Reply to Overcoming the problems with working at height in the Australia area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock