I'm not seeing any strain relief on the SWA cable.
 
I could only muster up 5 issues, but apparently there’s a 6th.!
So I opened up the challenge to you guys.
What is it pick your brain time game.
I'm glad it Xmas, what time is blanket blank on.
 
What is it pick your brain time game.
I'm glad it Xmas, what time is blanket blank on.
Last night, buzz… with such intellectuals as rob Beckett and Gemma Collins on the celebrity panel.
 
Last night, buzz… with such intellectuals as rob Beckett and Gemma Collins on the celebrity panel.
Looking forward to the annual Xmas rerun of ‘Morecomb and Wise’ Christmas special.
 
Looking forward to the annual Xmas rerun of ‘Morecomb and Wise’ Christmas special.
I'm looking Forward to the two rodneys down the pub, so it's good night from him
sliding under the table.
 
Morcombe and Wise, Two Ronnies???

Might I direct you fine gentlemen to another thread….

 
  • Like
Reactions: timhoward
Glanding the cable to a metal fused-switch like the Wylex ones would have been far better, then double insulated tails to the meter.

It looks like the "filler" insulation around the 3 cores has been clamped or similar - wonder how that dent happened?View attachment 112405
Didn’t even see that dent/damage.
Looking at the size of the damage, it could have possibly been some sought of over tightened Earth strap? (But why)? I’ve run out of idea.

Merry Xmas
 
Norman wisdom films me loves.
 
The earth tag does not match the template laid out in BS7671.

The text should read,

"Safety Electrical Connection, Do Not Remove"

Not,

"Safety Electrical Earth, Do Not Remove"

I'd also argue the Hepworth branding should not be there and the standard Earth pictogram is not used.

Pedantic, yes, but it is a noncompliance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: baldelectrician
mmm! not so sure Id agree it as a non-compliance, Isn't there a passage in the regs that says "alternative 'systems/methods' etc shall not be precluded as long as safety isn't impaired" (or something like that as I Don't have regs book to hand )?

Alternative wording/pictograms hardly impairs safety and message is clear enough!
 
  • Like
Reactions: GBDamo
mmm! not so sure Id agree it as a non-compliance, Isn't there a passage in the regs that says "alternative 'systems/methods' etc shall not be precluded as long as safety isn't impaired" (or something like that as I Don't have regs book to hand )?

Alternative wording/pictograms hardly impairs safety and message is clear enough!
OK so I was clutching at straws but it is the kind of thing examiners include solely to stop people getting full marks.
 
I am no expert on the regulations but wondered whether the sixth item is that the main equipotential bonding is done remote from the cutout location.

The according to the book ‘rule abiding‘ installation should have the earth conductor from the incoming N in the cutout going only a short distance to the main earth terminal bar, and then from this bar runs a cpc conductor to the dist boards, and separate EP bonding conductors for say water and gas connected also to the bar as in this figure.

With this scheme the cpc wiring and EP wiring do not share one conductor which might be considered a possible single point of failure. Just musing….

1703601788921.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I am no expert on the regulations but wondered whether the sixth item is that the main equipotential bonding is done remote from the cutout location.

The according to the book ‘rule abiding‘ installation should have the earth conductor from the incoming N in the cutout going only a short distance to the main earth terminal bar, and then from this bar runs a cpc conductor to the dist boards, and separate EP bonding conductors for say water and gas connected also to the bar as in this figure.

With this scheme the cpc wiring and EP wiring do not share one conductor which might be considered a possible single point of failure. Just musing….

View attachment 112486
They replaced meter tails with SWA making the MET remote.
We don't know how the swa terminates or if it is downstream fused.
A bit of a botch, whatever way you look at it.

A Spn fused connection unit would have been the way, but even then could cause a moan from the dno for using the meter cabinet.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: marconi and pc1966
Just spotted there is a wiring fault in the figure I copied and posted in my #34.
 
Just spotted there is a wiring fault in the figure I copied and posted in my #34.
Polarity is incorrect from the meter to the consumer unit😉
 
  • Winner
Reactions: marconi
I'm not sure the polarity is wrong, but probably the tails are incorrectly identified.

Many meters have L-N-N-L terminal lay-out.

Whichever though, its not correct.
You are correct, Marconi got his crayons mixed up😁
 
  • Funny
Reactions: marconi
1703601788921.jpeg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: Sapper and marconi

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
London UK
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Other
If other, please explain
Electrical Assessor

Thread Information

Title
Can anyone tell me what is wrong/incorrect.
Prefix
UK 
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
44

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Penguin,
Last reply from
Simon47,
Replies
44
Views
4,851

Advert