evening guys, ive come across lighting in one room of domestic premises that has been supplied from the ring main at some point. the cable coming from the ring is 1,5mm which goes through the switch then on to the 2 x 12V down lights. This is on an EICR I`m doing. There is no chance at all of accessing under the floor boards as there is very expensive oak flooring down every where. I believe that from memory you can use a switched fused spur for functional switching. I could then put in a 5A fuse and the load side of the cable will be protected. My concern though is the piece of 1,5mm from ring to switch? your thoughts on this would be welcome. I see this as no different to taking a spur off the ring for an extra socket etc, or am I forgetting some thing?
 
I agree with what you are saying Dave, its for sure bad practice but from a technical point of view that 1,5mm supply to fused spur is inaccessible so no chance of to many amps being pulled through it.
 
David...
whats the minimum CSA for FCU feeds?
and given that the largest fuse to BS1362 (13A) is under the max CCC of a 1.5/1.0 flat twin....
the fuse will dictate Max demand here so...

Yes Glen I take your point that FCU aint gonnar pull more than 13amp tops (max) or min 1amp depending what size fuse you put in so yes it will dictate max demand.But its just bad practice to have that size cable.
 
Yes Glen I take your point that FCU aint gonnar pull more than 13amp tops (max) or min 1amp depending what size fuse you put in so yes it will dictate max demand.But its just bad practice to have that size cable.
David...
you need to rethink statements like this ...as they are misleading to the pups in here...
 
Because its not the way we usually do it does not make it bad practice.
As stated above the FCU protects the 1.5 against overload. The MCB will still give adequate fault protection (Zs being correct of course!)
 
Could you not fit a fcu with 5a fuse in it next to the socket the 1.5mm is coming from and put the 1.5mm on the load side and a bit of 2.5mm between the socket and fcu next to it.
 
Could you not fit a fcu with 5a fuse in it next to the socket the 1.5mm is coming from and put the 1.5mm on the load side and a bit of 2.5mm between the socket and fcu next to it.

because it's probably joined into an inaccessible Jb under the oak floor. i'd just bung in an unswitched FCU with a 3A (or 5A) fuse before the light switch.
 
Replace the 1.5 feeding the switch (replace switch with FCU) with 2.5 simples it aint rocket science it's in the OSG plain as the nose on your face, no arguments just do it right the first time as Mike Holmes says.
 
Put it this way, if I carried out a job whereby I fed a FCU with 1.5mm from a ring final and some muppet came arond telling the customer it's bad practice and against regulation blah blah blah... That is SLANDER! Plain and simple! If you then proceeded to charge the customer to replace it that is obtaining money by deception, a criminal offence!

Any of you idiots out there that continue to propagate this myth that somehow the 1.5mm cable isn't protected are talking out of your rear end. I would suggest that you start by picking up a bloody regs book!!!
 
Replace the 1.5 feeding the switch (replace switch with FCU) with 2.5 simples it aint rocket science it's in the OSG plain as the nose on your face, no arguments just do it right the first time as Mike Holmes says.

Why?

Yes look at the guide for a guide (sarcasm), while at the same time ignoring the forward fusing rules (section 434) in the BGB.

Even the picture in App 15 tells us it does not cover other aspects of the design.
 
If I was installing this from scratch I would fuse down at the point of CCC reduction. If it was already present and as described by the OP, I would leave it as it is, there is absolutely nothing wrong with it.
 
I would suggest that you start by picking up a bloody regs book!!!

OK, to continue the discussion I'll try ....... as I understand the regs the C/B is installed to protect the cable, which in this case I read it as a 32A C/B protecting the 1.5mm cable fed off 2.5mm cable. So the 1.5mm cable isn’t being overload protected by the 32A C/B.

But regs do allow that if due to the cable load characteristics it isn’t likely to be overloaded then overload protection isn’t needed --- provided there is fault protection. For the 12V lights connected via a transformer I’ll take this as holding true for overload and the 1.5mm cable is good to use without circuit overload protection.

However, Ive still got to provide fault protection for this 1.5mm cable even though I don’t need overload protection. I’ll assume an RCD so a L/E fault is taken care of but what about a L/N fault? Will the cable hold out before the 32A C/B or DNO cut-out “pops”?. Using the let thro current calc will probably show the 1.5mm cable can handle this energy and is OK to use.

But if it cant handle the fault, how do I now provide fault protection for the 1.5mm cable?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
OK, to continue the discussion I'll try ....... as I understand the regs the C/B is installed to protect the cable, which in this case I read it as a 32A C/B protecting the 1.5mm cable fed off 2.5mm cable. So the 1.5mm cable isn’t being overload protected by the 32A C/B.

But regs do allow that if due to the cable load characteristics it isn’t likely to be overloaded then overload protection isn’t needed --- provided there is fault protection. For the 12V lights connected via a transformer I’ll take this as holding true for overload and the 1.5mm cable is good to use without circuit overload protection.

However, Ive still got to provide fault protection for this 1.5mm cable even though I don’t need overload protection. I’ll assume an RCD so a L/E fault is taken care of but what about a L/N fault? Will the cable hold out before the 32A C/B or DNO cut-out “pops”?. Using the let thro current calc will probably show the 1.5mm cable can handle this energy and is OK to use.

But if it cant handle the fault, how do I now provide fault protection for the 1.5mm cable?

Going round in circles here, see my earlier post. Fault protection will be supplied via the CB.
 
True, if the 32A C/B can do the trick for 1.5mm cable?!?!. But the question was aimed that if the 32A C/B cant (and there isnt an FCU fitted for overload protection) how is fault protection now covered?
I understood from OP that there is FCU fitted, this give overload protection.

From reg 434.5.2 the 1.5mm cable will reach its limiting temp in about 1.6 seconds (assuming 160A fault current) As the CB will operate in about 0.1 seconds, at this current, fault protection is afforded
 
I understood from OP that there is FCU fitted, this give overload protection.

Sorry if my reply has confused but the thread is directed along there being no FCU fitted for protection, hence my question for how to protect for fault current in the unlikely event that the 32A C/B cant!.
 
you are right that you can take lighting off a ring final circuit and I know its bad practice to use 1.5mm cable to do the first leg of that circuit extension with but as 1.5mm can carry up to 16A, that first leg will only be carrying the load of the lighting to which you will have a 5A fuse in series. so I would make sure firstly that the 1.5mm does not form part of the ring final circuit and if this proves so then I would have said it is ok to remain. just note as a code 3 on your report.
 
youre all missing the point !
the OP declared this to be an eicr , therefore the only discussion should about the coding if any.
and IMO its probably a C2 - but a 2 minute fix with a switched fused spur.
 
but even after prominant members in here made it quite clear that it was acceptable to use a 1.5 as a feeder to an FCU there were still several others continuing blubbing on about how they would rip out the 1.5 and replace with 2.5....
an unneccessary nonsense if you ask me
christ, what do some in here think we fuse down for?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
but even after prominant members in here made it quite clear that it was acceptable to use a 1.5 as a feeder to an FCU there were still several others continuing blubbing on about how they would rip out the 1.5 and replace with 2.5....
an unneccessary nonsense if you ask me
christ, what do some n here think we fuse down for?

The fun of it?

Lecky takes easiest route so splicing cable then adding fcu would be more than adequate.

If i was installing myself though id probably use 2.5 to fcu but woudlnt replace if it was done in 1.5
 
but even after prominant members in here made it quite clear that it was acceptable to use a 1.5 as a feeder to an FCU there were still several others continuing blubbing on about how they would rip out the 1.5 and replace with 2.5....
an unneccessary nonsense if you ask me
christ, what do some n here think we fuse down for?

prominent, glenn. get a grip, man. :angelsad2:
 

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Green 2 Go Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined

Thread Information

Title
Lighting circuit taken off ring main somewhere
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
67
Unsolved
--

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Ross1,
Last reply from
Pete999,
Replies
67
Views
10,400

Advert

Back
Top