failed EICR, please can you advice

UNG · Jan 4, 2022

So there is a limitation on circuit 4 of not found yet the schedule suggests it is the intruder alarm surely turning off circuit 4 would cause a mains fault on the system thereby verifying it as the intruder alarm supply

Also, why all the different IR thresholds, every IR / MFT tester has different over range limits that vary from >200 to >999 but when he has used the same tester for all of the tests how does he get >500, >999 and >1049

Not the best EICR but not as bad as some of them posted on here

ssn1122 · Jan 4, 2022

nicebutdim said:
Just posted images from the PDF, but can't make them enlargeable.

Smoke detectors outside remit of this report, but they'll need to be replaced as it's a rental property.

Under sink sockets issue seems unusual as does the requirement of waterproof containment for their wiring. Are they wired in surface trunking from above worktop level? Regardless, this won't contribute significantly to cost of remedial work and there may be reasons for this that aren't immediately apparent from the report alone.

'Waterproof' is a poor choice of term but, depending on placement of bathroom and ensuite lights, it may well be that they don't meet required IP rating and need to be replaced. Again impossible to comment on, but not a major cost.

Fan isolation switch replacement may be a bit strict, but again can not comment without more information and no significant cost would be involved in their replacement

Single RCD only protecting circuits 8-14 and not meeting required disconnection times is a definite issue and new consumer unit is likely to be the best way of resolving this if the existing RCD is obsolete and also overcoming the lack of supplementary bonding in bathrooms. While this is likely to be the main cost of remedial work, I'd probably prefer to look at a slightly more expensive all RCBO replacement for a number of reasons.

Just one person's opinion, but it seems to be a fairly comprehensive report that has highlighted a couple of potentially very serious issues

Thank you for the feedback. Would battery operated smoke alarms be suitable ?

Under sink sockets and lighting passed in the previous report in 2014, so not sure if there is some new regulation since then ? He has quoted £150 to remove and install 2 waterproof sockets under sink and £120nto install 2 LED waterproof lights . Also will the IP rating be on the lights ? Where do I look for that ?

Thank you again for your time

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

UNG said:
Also, why all the different IR thresholds, every IR / MFT tester has different over range limits that vary from >200 to >999 but when he has used the same tester for all of the tests how does he get >500, >999 and >1049

The Napit software offers you this:

It's tedious to use, every other value you have to add to the list using "Other" and some people don't bother.
As to what is wrong with a box to type the number into, I have no idea!

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

ssn1122 said:
He has quoted £150 to remove and install 2 waterproof sockets under sink and £120nto install 2 LED waterproof lights .

I'd nicely ask him exactly which regulation the current arrangements under the sink are violating. If you like, stick a picture up here of under the sink, then you can legitimately say you have sought a 2nd opinion.
If there's currently a leak or broken seal anywhere causing them to get regularly wet, then maybe external influences could be reasonably cited, otherwise I suspect this is one that 'looks wrong' to some people's eyes but isn't actually wrong.

ssn1122 said:
Also will the IP rating be on the lights ? Where do I look for that ?

Stick a photo up if unsure.
A google for "bathroom zones" should help explain this.
Zones 0 and 1 needs spray proof lights (IP55/65). Any gaps in the fitting or around the bulb usually indicate they are not spray proof. You are looking for a design that looks enclosed.
Zone 2 needs splash proof lights (IP44 or higher). I find this harder to determine, many people just use the spray proof lights here too.
If it's a taller than 2.25m ceiling, or the fitting is outside zone 2 then there are no restrictions.

UNG · Jan 4, 2022

timhoward said:
The Napit software offers you this:
View attachment 93688
It's tedious to use, every other value you have to add to the list using "Other" and some people don't bother.
As to what is wrong with a box to type the number into, I have no idea!

Thanks for heads up on that one didn't realise that it was the scheme software that makes the IR test results look a bit phoney
Can't see >1049 in that drop down list though

ssn1122 · Jan 4, 2022

timhoward said:
I'd nicely ask him exactly which regulation the current arrangements under the sink are violating. If you like, stick a picture up here of under the sink, then you can legitimately say you have sought a 2nd opinion.
If there's currently a leak or broken seal anywhere causing them to get regularly wet, then maybe external influences could be reasonably cited, otherwise I suspect this is one that 'looks wrong' to some people's eyes but isn't actually wrong.

Stick a photo up if unsure.
A google for "bathroom zones" should help explain this.
Zones 0 and 1 needs spray proof lights (IP55/65). Any gaps in the fitting or around the bulb usually indicate they are not spray proof. You are looking for a design that looks enclosed.
Zone 2 needs splash proof lights (IP44 or higher). I find this harder to determine, many people just use the spray proof lights here too.
If it's a taller than 2.25m ceiling, or the fitting is outside zone 2 then there are no restrictions.

Thank you ...this really helpful . I will put up a picture when I visit the property . Also The light fitting is encased but I will take a few measurements . It passed the last EICR so not sure wat has changed

pc1966 · Jan 4, 2022

ssn1122 said:
It passed the last EICR so not sure what has changed

Generally speaking many things can change:

Regulations. While the wiring regs are not retrospective (unlike fire safety, e.g. cable collapse factors) an EICR is always done using the current regulations and guidance, with older installations judged by the risk due to practices of that time.
Risk. While wiring regulations were always "safe enough" at the time they were in use, what is seen as acceptable risk changes with time and with modern usage patterns (as well as the occasional tradgedy focusing on some specific point).
Ageing. You might have some cable or accessory that was fine 5 or 10 years ago, but now has got to the point where it is not longer OK.
Environment. Changes to the use of a room, etc, can place electrical equipment in to a different risk region.
Judgment. Many aspects of an EICR involve the judgement of the electrician looking at an installation and try to combine all of the above in to a code C1/C2/C3/none for the report. That has both a personal aspect, as well as an aspect based on what guidance they use (e.g. guidance from NECIEC has some differences from the Best Practice Guide #4)

Not a comment on your situation, just a general point that passing an inspection years ago is not automatically a pass today (rather like car MOT).

ssn1122 · Jan 4, 2022

westward10 said:
I didn't see the cracked sockets comment but it doesn't seem so blurry this morning

The cracked socket was not there before as my washing machine and dryer ere plugged in , however as the EICR was handled by the estate agent and we were not at the property I am not sure how to approach this but it was definitely not cracked before

ssn1122 · Jan 4, 2022

Julie. said:
I take a completely different view on this report, as to me it raises a number of concerns re. the person doing the report.

Firstly it indicates that rcd is required for fault protection - why? All zs appear to be within limits.

But then again it uses the hot (reg) limits for max zs, and cold measured zs

It states waterproof (ip x7) required in bathroom etc - not required by the regs unless it genuinely is within zone 0 , other than that ip x4 is required, which is normal fittings.

These are serious misunderstandings of the regulations and testing and inspection in general, can we therefore believe the other observations - for example socket within 3m of zone 1 - is the bathroom that big? If the socket is outside of the room 701.32.1 applies.

Also waterproof required under sink (sensible but no regulation demanding it)

As for the rcd fail, perhaps this is right, but I am somewhat doubtful that the testing was completed correctly based on the misunderstandings above, did he/she test on the correct setting?

OK, there are a number of potentially valid observations, cracked sockets etc, cpc missing in switch etc.

And it does look like there is an incorrect mcb fitted.

However, I would be concerned with the workscope suggested, I would engage a different electrician to replace the valid sockets, tighten up the loose ones etc and investigate the validity of the suspicious observations, which may result in a new board.

Thanks Julie , he has quoted £1000 to do all the work so wanted to ask for some advice on here .

Also can you explain what do you mean by socket within 3m of zone 1 . Should it be more than 3m away ?

Deleted account · Jan 4, 2022

its difficult to comment on a report without seeing the installation.

it’s easy to be an armchair online critic, however the final report is Down to the person who inspected it.

accept it or don’t. Your choice.
I’ve seen really bad reports and brilliant reports. This is not one of those bad reports. It way up there in fact. Not brilliant and I would cod slightly differently, but ask four sparkies a question on electrics you will get 4 different answers.

id advice accepting the report and get the work done.

Julie. · Jan 4, 2022

ssn1122 said:
Thanks Julie , he has quoted £1000 to do all the work so wanted to ask for some advice on here .

Also can you explain what do you mean by socket within 3m of zone 1 . Should it be more than 3m away ?

When you have a bath or shower, the space around is defined by zones 0, 1 & 2, and there are different requirements for ingress protection (waterproofness), types of equipment etc for each zone.

There is also a regulation which prevents having a standard socket outlet within 3 metres.

However this only applies within the room itself, or if there isn't a barrier (door, window, hatch etc).

So you can have an outlet directly outside the bathroom door for example, but if you remove the door then it would be prohibited.

If the shower is contained within a proper enclosure (not just a leaky cubicle), again ok within 3 metres, (but not within zone 2), remove the shower enclosure then prohibited etc.

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

Just to add that the report says:
"Low voltage (e.g. 230 volt) socket-outlets sited at least 3 m from zone 1 (701.512.3) Fan isolation switch in bathroom and on-suite. x2 in total"
The first section was auto-completed from ticking a box elsewhere. I still think it actually refers to having fan isolators in zone 2. The "socket" could be a complete red herring, due to the wrong schedule item being chosen.

westward10 · Jan 4, 2022

timhoward said:
Just to add that the report says:
"Low voltage (e.g. 230 volt) socket-outlets sited at least 3 m from zone 1 (701.512.3) Fan isolation switch in bathroom and on-suite. x2 in total"
The first section was auto-completed from ticking a box elsewhere. I still think it actually refers to having fan isolators in zone 2. The "socket" could be a complete red herring, due to the wrong schedule item being chosen.

I agree but if these isolators are in zone 2 it wouldn't matter if they are waterproof, whatever that is or sprinkled with fairy dust they shouldn't be in zone 2. The report however isn't clear where they are and outside of this zone they can be standard isolators.

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

westward10 said:
I agree but if these isolators are in zone 2 it wouldn't matter if they are waterproof, whatever that is or sprinkled with fairy dust they shouldn't be in zone 2. The report however isn't clear where they are and outside of this zone they can be standard isolators.

Agreed. It's definitely not an optimal write up...
btw the 'waterproof' thing was about lights and sockets under the kitchen sink - different items.

westward10 · Jan 4, 2022

timhoward said:
Agreed. It's definitely not an optimal write up...
btw the 'waterproof' thing was about lights and sockets under the kitchen sink - different items.

It mentions waterproof isolators in #1. The house will end up looking like a plant room

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

westward10 said:
It mentions waterproof isolators in #1. The house will end up looking like a plant room

Ah - I was looking at the report itself which is a bit (but not much!) clearer than the paraphrased version from the landlord.

brianmoooore · Jan 4, 2022

No zone around the bathroom basin in my version of the 18th!

westward10 · Jan 4, 2022

brianmoooore said:
No zone around the bathroom basin in my version of the 18th!

There has never been a zone surrounding the sink but a lot of pics online show one.

brianmoooore · Jan 4, 2022

westward10 said:
There has never been a zone surrounding the sink but a lot of pics online show one.

I'm well aware of that, but it's the kind of thing that gives rise to spurious coding on EICRs - the subject of this thread.

timhoward · Jan 4, 2022

brianmoooore said:
I'm well aware of that, but it's the kind of thing that gives rise to spurious coding on EICRs - the subject of this thread.

Do a google image search for "bathroom zones", and 18 of the first 20 results show one!
It takes concerted effort to find a correct diagram unfortunately.

~

ssn1122

~

~

~

ssn1122

ssn1122

ssn1122

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

Share this page to anywhere at all

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Advert