HappyHippyDad

~
Esteemed
Arms
Supporter
Dec 18, 2011
5,378
6,731
405,788
Gloucestershire
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)
I have just popped out to a frustrated customer who has had intermittent tripping of a 30mA RCD for years, on average 5 - 10 x p/month. It used to be 10 x p/month a year ago, now it is around 5 times p/month. This is a dual RCD board (Harok??) with 2 socket circuits and 2 lighting circuits on the affected side. There is alot of electronic equipment plugged in.

I did a x5 and x1 test (at a socket). The RCD tripped but the tester just came up with 'trp' meaning it tripped too quickly for a reading. The ramp test did the same. I then tested at the RCD and it tested as 24mA and 19ms. The customer was adamant the RCD was 'too sensitive', but the above tests seem to show it is not (although 19ms is a little quick).

Global IR results showed 1.7Mohm N-E.

I clamped the Main earth (TNCS). It jumped up to 26mA for <1s and then stayed at around 3mA. It did this every time I tested. It is a poor quality earth clamp meter. He had switched off most of his electronic equipment when I tested, but not unplugged, therefore N still attached.

He just wants me to change the board, and throw money at me as he is so fed up. However, that's likely not going to solve the problem, hence having a chat with you guys.

Would an RCBO board help? I.e if it is a build up of earth leakage this option would help. It wouldn't help if all the earth leakage was just on one circuit though.

Do you think it is natural earth leakage from electronic equipment? If so, what is the solution? I'm not too sure how to test each item of equipment for earth leakage.

Perhaps it is something else. Is 19mS too quick to trip (I think it is on the low side, but not abnormally low)?

Perhaps an intermittent fault which didn't show up when I tested. However, he said it had tripped just before I came and tested.

My instinct is on accumulated earth leakage, but again I'm unsure of the solution or testing for this.

Cheers all ?
 
RCBO board. i suspect it's a combination of accumulated leakage. the 19mA trip will probably come better with no circuits connected.
 
As @telectrix said, go for an RCBO board. It will probably fix it for good if it is related to accumulated leakage. Even if it is not fixing an underlying problem, at least you will know which of the 4 circuits is responsible which would speed fault investigation, and the annoyance value will be significantly less.

Also gives them an SPD, and while many are sceptical of their benefits I certainly think we will see more issues of cheap & nasty consumer electronics failing on smaller surges that simple or well-designed electronics would laugh off.

Something like the Fusebox RCBO board with SPD is not that expensive, total cost would be dominated by your work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPG and nicebutdim
go for an RCBO board. It will probably fix it for good if it is related to accumulated leakage.
Is all well swapping a board but will not solve the problem with out being fixed.
Me find the fault before swapping.
 
Is all well swapping a board but will not solve the problem with out being fixed.
Me find the fault before swapping.

In fairness swoping out for rcbos is a method of solving nuisance trips as you're likely reducing the leakage on each device
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicebutdim
Or at least it can be part of the solution
 
I would IR test each circuit individually to see each reading per circuit.
 
Also maybe ramp test at the RCD with one circuit off at a time? See if the "trp" is only with one circuit OFF.
As above, if the customer wants a new board then an RCBO board is a step in the right direction anyway. A Fusebox board would be ideal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Baddegg
Testing for cumulative leakage is best done by clamping the line and neutral tails together, not the main earthing conductor, as there can be all sorts of stray currents flowing in the main earth.

Is that accurate when you clamp the 2 together, I presume it is

Obviously main earth's may have leakage from non RCD protected circuits so isn't likely accurate
 
Yes it's basically simulating what the RCD senses - an imbalance between line and neutral. Probably even better to clamp the cables of the RCD in question if it's a split load board.
 
I clamped the Main earth (TNCS). It jumped up to 26mA for <1s and then stayed at around 3mA. It did this every time I tested. It is a poor quality earth clamp meter. He had switched off most of his electronic equipment when I tested, but not unplugged, therefore N still attached.
Clamping the main earth is not an accurate method of assessing the earth leakage you need to clamp the live and neutral feeding the RCD together and any inbalance will be read by the clampmeter as the true earth leakage as this will include any parallel earth paths
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPG and loz2754
Many thanks for all the replies.
I've gone with the RCBO board and will report back when it's fitted ?
 
Hopefully , you haven't a massive number of circuits on the affected side

The lighting may not be involved and it could depend on the balance of leakage on the 2 socket circuits if this is an issue

Some testing may be prudent as posters advised
 
do a full test before fitting new CU...could save a LOT of headache afterwards
 
Many thanks for all the replies.
I've gone with the RCBO board and will report back when it's fitted ?
I think you, ve made the right choice with the rcbo CU. I would also add that the 19ms trip time is very normal for the rcd in my experience
 
Is all well swapping a board but will not solve the problem with out being fixed.
Me find the fault before swapping.
You are quite right that any faults should be investigated before swapping stuff. But in this case the IR results are OK-ish (low, but not out of a EICR pass) and it seems other checks like clamp for leakage, etc, have already been done but nothing pointing to a definite cause.

Having two socket circuits and two lights off one RCD is not a very good idea in these days of many electronic gadgets, both from an accumulated leakage point of view and from a 'damn its dark suddenly' point of view. So the suggestion of an RCBO board would be what I would think of as dealing with accumulated leakage as well as minimising the consequences of an RCD trip.

Yes, it might not actually solve the problem if there is some wiring or accessory that has a deeper intermittent fault, but it would allow the source to be narrowed down considerably to the specific circuit that trips, and from that point it might be feasible to loot at other diagnostic routes like PAT testing of appliances on one socket group, or pulling all lamps and IR testing at 1kV on lights, etc, to provoke an actual measurable fault.

Calling out a sparky another half dozen times to try and pin things down it probably costing more than an RCBO board and a single follow-up call!

(My reply is for general interest, not any criticism of yourself)
 
do a full test before fitting new CU...could save a LOT of headache afterwards
This is one of those unusual cases.
Firstly to have an rcd tripping regularly for several years without been sorted by one of the sparks who have investigated is very rare. My gut instinct in this situation would also be accumulated earth leakage. What's throws me a little is the IR test results. Just under 2 Mohms is extremely low and usually indicative of electrical issues. However it is often the case that during the test there may still be some equipment or appliance still connected giving an artificially low reading. Whatever the case its clear that in this situation some concrete action has to be taken and the change to an rcbo CU will certainly provide more answers than are presently available. And let's face it, its a good investment regardless
 
Lets put ourselves in the customers shoes, internment RCD tripping over a very long period of time. We dont know the full story of any intervention over this time.
Changing to RCBO's the expense of this for arguments sake £600 and the fault although narrowed down to hopefully one circuit, BUT it still tripping you are not going to be happy.

IMO drilling down on each circuit with IR testing is the way forward, and start investigating the the circuits with the lowest IR.
 
Lets put ourselves in the customers shoes, internment RCD tripping over a very long period of time. We dont know the full story of any intervention over this time.
Changing to RCBO's the expense of this for arguments sake £600 and the fault although narrowed down to hopefully one circuit, BUT it still tripping you are not going to be happy.

IMO drilling down on each circuit with IR testing is the way forward, and start investigating the the circuits with the lowest IR.

Wait til u change from an RCD to rcbos and it starts tripping 2 after lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pretty Mouth

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

HappyHippyDad

Esteemed
Arms
Supporter
~
Joined
Location
Gloucestershire
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)

Thread Information

Title
Why is the RCD tripping?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
31

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
HappyHippyDad,
Last reply from
Mikegh,
Replies
31
Views
4,855

Advert