- Dec 18, 2011
- 5,378
- 6,731
- 405,788
- If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
- United Kingdom
- What type of forum member are you?
- Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)
My customer asked me to change her intermittently working bathroom pull switch.
When i arrived I saw that it was a 45A shower pull switch purely being used to switch the light on and off. Wired in 1mm.
However, there was a conductor in the both the L and N in the supply side, and just one conductor in the L on the load side.
My question is, is the conductor in the N on the supply side doing absolutely anything? i know its not!! But, I just cant for the life of me figure out why it's been done, so I'm doubting myself. There is also one other conductor, just left in a wago.
The bathroom light is not IP rated, there is no RCD protection and the wiring is awful. i will obviously fix all of that, but that also makes me more worried and doubting of the strange wiring in the switch.
Can it ONLY be a PL and SL? Same as a normal switching arrangement. Perhaps they have simply left a conductor in the N supply rather than a wago. Just fancied mulling it over before tomorrow morning. Thanks
When i arrived I saw that it was a 45A shower pull switch purely being used to switch the light on and off. Wired in 1mm.
However, there was a conductor in the both the L and N in the supply side, and just one conductor in the L on the load side.
My question is, is the conductor in the N on the supply side doing absolutely anything? i know its not!! But, I just cant for the life of me figure out why it's been done, so I'm doubting myself. There is also one other conductor, just left in a wago.
The bathroom light is not IP rated, there is no RCD protection and the wiring is awful. i will obviously fix all of that, but that also makes me more worried and doubting of the strange wiring in the switch.
Can it ONLY be a PL and SL? Same as a normal switching arrangement. Perhaps they have simply left a conductor in the N supply rather than a wago. Just fancied mulling it over before tomorrow morning. Thanks
