Used twin row (2 x 10W) MEM plastic boards for years on loads of domestic installations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicebutdim
  • Agree
Reactions: Risteard
I can’t see the point of removing the DIN rail!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Risteard
In the wooden partition.
didn't you see the video? It's to prepare for all the future circuits for your battery banks and electric car charging points! (If you can afford it after spending all your money on the CU) Just feed the cable into the already made hole...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dave OCD
didn't you see the video? It's to prepare for all the future circuits for your battery banks and electric car charging points! (If you can afford it after spending all your money on the CU) Just feed the cable into the already made hole...
Except that they probably wouldn't come in from the back.
 
Last edited:
In the wooden partition.
Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?
 
The large hole helps vent the flames into the wall void.
 
Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?
It's into a partition, nothing is going to be easy to get back entry into that CU.
 
The large hole helps vent the flames into the wall void.
Exactly! The enclosure is not air tight, and heat inside will be fanned into flames by the chimney effect of the void. just like nominally non flammable insulation on the outside of high rise buildings.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: mainline
Well it's smaller than the steel knockout and makes it nice and easy to feed the cables into the back of the CU, so what's the point in making the cutout smaller and more fiddly ?
Going with that logic, they may as well knock all of them out, that would make it a lot easier.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Dave OCD
Totally irrelevant. And there is nothing in the Regs about making a CU 'airtight' , if anything that's counter productive as we're told to install in such a way to minimise the build up of heat or words to that effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jonny A
There shouldn't be a chimney effect as there should be cavity barriers for this purpose.
 
Totally irrelevant. And there is nothing in the Regs about making a CU 'airtight' , if anything that's counter productive as we're told to install in such a way to minimise the build up of heat or words to that effect.
As far as is reasonably practicable, to contain any fire within the enclosure or cabinet and to minimise the escape of flames.
 
Don't give anybody ideas ! Can you imagine trying to add a cable to that ?! 😁
 
  • Funny
Reactions: Dave OCD

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
The Future of Fuse boards...?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
117

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Dustydazzler,
Last reply from
Mike Johnson,
Replies
117
Views
10,659

Advert