L
Well spotted!Nice! Sitting on a DAC90 unless I'm mistaken.
Comparing that to 2-core 35mm SWA which looks closes today I see R1 as 0.524 mOhm/m and the armour R2 as 2.6mOhm/m, so the lead sheathed cable is better!Resistance of 125mm² lead = 2.2E-7 / 125E-6 = 1.76mΩ/m
Resistance of 151mm² lead = 2.2E-7 / 151E-6 = 1.46mΩ/m
Resistance of 19/.064 TC = 0.4195Ω / 1000 yds. = 0.459mΩ/m
LucianLet's try to validate the lead CSA for the older BIC 19/.064 by calculating it both from the stated dimensions and from the linear weights.
Lead O/D = 0.85 ins. = 21.59mm
Lead I/D = 0.85 - (2 * 0.08) = 0.69 ins. = 17.53mm
Lead CSA from dims = ((21.59 / 2)² - (17.53 / 2)²) * Π = 125mm²
Weight of twin cable = 43.75cwt / 1000 yds. = 2.431kg/m
Weight of 19/.064 copper = 720.3 lbs / 1000 yds. = 0.3573kg/m
Weight of lead (ignoring paper) = 2.431 - (2 * 0.3573) = 1.7164kg/m
Lead density (ignoring alloying elements) = 11.34g/cm³
Lead volume per metre = 1716.4 / 11.34 = 151.4cm³
Lead CSA from weight = 151mm²
Lead resistivity 2.2E-7 Ωm @ 20°C ignoring alloying.
Resistance of 125mm² lead = 2.2E-7 / 125E-6 = 1.76mΩ/m
Resistance of 151mm² lead = 2.2E-7 / 151E-6 = 1.46mΩ/m
Resistance of 19/.064 TC = 0.4195Ω / 1000 yds. = 0.459mΩ/m
I'll do the later Enfield cable in the morning unless someone wants to save me the effort.