Discuss SWA CLEATS IN WOODEN GARDEN SHED in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

There's the answer, the wiring system will not collapse prematurely as the structure it is attached to will be in a state of collapse already by the time PVC cleats fail.

Also while no mention of the type of building, the intention is to prevent entanglement of emergency response personnel if they enter a building with a collapsed wiring system.

No firefighter is going to enter a shed other than to rescue a person and I can't recall there being a single case of shed based self immolation, so the whole discussion is moot.

Well it's mootier still as, in the infinitesimally small chance that a firefighter does enter and become entangled, who can prove what failed first and where.

This is so nonsensical I'm wondering if it's trolling?
I understand entirely your point of view, but I disagree. I do not see any provision for the application of common sense or making a judgement in the regulation. If the reg was open to the installer making a judgement on whether it is required then there would be plenty of cases where it should be installed but wouldn't be. I'ts a blanket requirement.
 
I understand entirely your point of view, but I disagree. I do not see any provision for the application of common sense or making a judgement in the regulation. If the reg was open to the installer making a judgement on whether it is required then there would be plenty of cases where it should be installed but wouldn't be. I'ts a blanket requirement.

Few sparks haven't used some common sense from time to time regardless of the regs, just as not everyone drives at 30mph in a 30mph zone. I once knew someone that got up to almost 35mph in a 30mph zone, and it played on my mind for weeks after whether I should have reported him to the feds.
 
Last edited:
I understand entirely your point of view, but I disagree. I do not see any provision for the application of common sense or making a judgement in the regulation. If the reg was open to the installer making a judgement on whether it is required then there would be plenty of cases where it should be installed but wouldn't be. I'ts a blanket requirement.
And truth be told I'd probably use fire retardant clips but I'd be cussing like a sailor whilst doing it.
 
There's the answer, the wiring system will not collapse prematurely as the structure it is attached to will be in a state of collapse already by the time PVC cleats fail.

Also while no mention of the type of building, the intention is to prevent entanglement of emergency response personnel if they enter a building with a collapsed wiring system.

No firefighter is going to enter a shed other than to rescue a person and I can't recall there being a single case of shed based self immolation, so the whole discussion is moot.

Well it's mootier still as, in the infinitesimally small chance that a firefighter does enter and become entangled, who can prove what failed first and where.

This is so nonsensical I'm wondering if it's trolling?
Do the Regulations actually state the requirements for support methods are for the benefit of the emergency services.
 
The regulations simply state that wiring systems shall be constructed to prevent premature collapse in the event of fire, there is no mention of type of installation....shed....domestic....commercial....industrial. Nor does it say common sense can be applied,it's a blanket requirement no matter how daft it might seem. Hence the disagrees to some of the above posts. If you ignore the requirement it's a departure, your call if you want to justify it on your EIC.
It can never be a departure, a departure needs to have a degree of safety not less than the regulations.
 
Do the Regulations actually state the requirements for support methods are for the benefit of the emergency services.
No but a big deal was made of the reason prior to the 18th and at my 18th course so I think we all know why this reg was brought in.
 
NEWS!.....18th edition amendment 1, requirement...…..all garden sheds to be replaced with Anderson shelters...…...and wired in pyro.:)
 
Would the shed not then require a plasterboard ceiling using that criteria?
Er…..No
The criteria is that if there is a plasterboard ceiling then cables secured to the joists above with plastic clips are deemed to meet the requirement, in that the ceiling will prevent the cables falling into accessible areas before the fire causes structural collapse. Clearly that is unlikely to apply to the average shed
 
Just use a few galvanised saddles - probably cheaper anyway. They won't fail till the wall burns down - that's 'structural failure'.
Can't see what all the fuss is about!
Do we want the shed to burn down and leave the cables standing?
 

Reply to SWA CLEATS IN WOODEN GARDEN SHED in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock