ECA and ESC announce major partnership

[Outspoken]

Frequency chap...HV and HF....BAD combination as the heart basically explodes in the chest cavity..

 

[Rockingit]

I find it both ironic and morbidly comic that a thread which started off by the NICEIC/ECA proudly announcing their intention for electrical marriage has ended in a discussion of the most effective way to kill people with it.

Truth is stranger than fiction and you draw your own conclusions!

 

[Outspoken]

That is very true Rocky, perhaps we should call it quits whilst we are ahead...well I think we are anyway!

 

[imago]

So as soon I was finally handed my indentures the door was closed to further training was it?
I don’t think so, the learning had only just begun.

Totally agree, but the starting points then and now are very different, and so is the work. Electrician as a job exists in very few places now. There is very little requirement for an all rounder capable of working on HV/industrial installation, the local chippy's frier, or Mrs Jones hall light. As the jobs description and type of work has become more specialised/restricted so has the training.

I have for instance quite recently worked with two lads who are both time served (apprenticed) electricians in their mid/late 20s. All they had done since then were new build installs. They were very quick, did a tidy job and new their stuff regarding the regs. Neither of them had used an MFT for years, they'd never worked on any three phase stuff and (like most) had a healthy fear/respect for anything involving kv but had never worked with it.

So their 2330 City & Guilds which you pointed out is a lesser qualification to the older 236# is in fact far more than they need to carry out their jobs. Likewise it would be overhorsed for a lot of roles within the industry as it currently is.

 

[Engineer54]

I find it both ironic and morbidly comic that a thread which started off by the NICEIC/ECA proudly announcing their intention for electrical marriage has ended in a discussion of the most effective way to kill people with it.

Truth is stranger than fiction and you draw your own conclusions!

Maybe because from day one of this thread, it was clear that these two scheme providers that were proudly ringing the all saints bells of electrical safety, was a complete farce!! When they will eagerly sign up 17 day whizz kids and electrical trainee into their organisations and officially registering them to unsuspecting customers and the general public alike, as being competent. There is always going to be double standards at play with these organisations, where money is the main driving force!! lol!!

 

[Spoon]

Maybe because from day one of this thread, it was clear that these two scheme providers that were proudly ringing the all saints bells of electrical safety, was a complete farce!! When they will eagerly sign up 17 day whizz kids and electrical trainee into their organisations and officially registering them to unsuspecting customers and the general public alike, as being competent. There is always going to be double standards at play with these organisations, where money is the main driving force!! lol!!

You can't blame them for trying to pull the wool over our eyes. They are big companies that want more profit and will try and get it anyway they can. Its just good that so many of us saw that this was not about 'Safety' but about 'more money!'

 

[Dcf]

Totally agree, but the starting points then and now are very different, and so is the work. Electrician as a job exists in very few places now. There is very little requirement for an all rounder capable of working on HV/industrial installation, the local chippy's frier, or Mrs Jones hall light. As the jobs description and type of work has become more specialised/restricted so has the training.

I have for instance quite recently worked with two lads who are both time served (apprenticed) electricians in their mid/late 20s. All they had done since then were new build installs. They were very quick, did a tidy job and new their stuff regarding the regs. Neither of them had used an MFT for years, they'd never worked on any three phase stuff and (like most) had a healthy fear/respect for anything involving kv but had never worked with it.

So their 2330 City & Guilds which you pointed out is a lesser qualification to the older 236# is in fact far more than they need to carry out their jobs. Likewise it would be overhorsed for a lot of roles within the industry as it currently is.

A spot on over view of one of the main things affecting the trade.
As I've said before u can't have sparks making more than professionals now can we.
lets divide it up into "specialist trades" and watch the rates plummet that will sort them out. Teaching someone abit of a trade and then telling them that's it, has been quite some con trick in my book .i actually take some pride in being an all rounder
schemes are only there to get as many members as possible, sell you training courses and keep their 40k +car+benefits jobs on the back of our industry

 

[Engineer54]

Totally agree, but the starting points then and now are very different, and so is the work. Electrician as a job exists in very few places now. There is very little requirement for an all rounder capable of working on HV/industrial installation, the local chippy's frier, or Mrs Jones hall light. As the jobs description and type of work has become more specialised/restricted so has the training.

I have for instance quite recently worked with two lads who are both time served (apprenticed) electricians in their mid/late 20s. All they had done since then were new build installs. They were very quick, did a tidy job and new their stuff regarding the regs. Neither of them had used an MFT for years, they'd never worked on any three phase stuff and (like most) had a healthy fear/respect for anything involving kv but had never worked with it.

So their 2330 City & Guilds which you pointed out is a lesser qualification to the older 236# is in fact far more than they need to carry out their jobs. Likewise it would be overhorsed for a lot of roles within the industry as it currently is.

No it's not!! both 2360 and 2330 are CORE qualifications that ''Every'' electrician should have before calling themselves electricians.

The fact that these two lads that you mention here, haven't had cause or opportunity to work in various aspects of our trade is neither here nor there!! At least they will have the foundation to be able to work in such areas.

MV/HV working, has never been part of any journeyman electricians training, that is an area where you either specialise and receive additional training/or pick-up working with others that do have the experience in this field as you go through your career. Following the latter, these day's, your involvement would probably be minimal, restricted mainly to pulling of MV/HV cables and ''helping'' with terminations and a few other odds an ends!!

 

[imago]

No it's not!! both 2360 and 2330 are CORE qualifications that ''Every'' electrician should have before calling themselves electricians.

Make your mind up!

To be frank, your arguments are just about as daft as going back to college, to gain what amounts to a lower standard of the qualification you already held!! And that, just about sums up your points and arguments !!

Either the 2330 is a lesser qualification and a waste of my time, or its a core requirement for every electrician.

To be honest I can't be bothered arguing anymore. If anyone has the temerity to take a different view to your own you throw all your toys out of the pram. If they still don't back down you start contradicting yourself in an attempt to prove a point.

Things have moved on, many of us don't think it's for the better or like the changes. Some accept that progress isn't allways good and get on with it. Some moan their faces off on a forum and try to belittle anyone who takes a different view or route to theirs. So you carry on moaning and tilting at windmills, I'll carry on earning a living, and so will the evil training providers and dodgy 5 week wonders.

I'll bet that while all that is going on there won't be a sudden increase in electrocutions, the job of an electrician will continue to have several definitions, society will not come to an end, and the majority of people will carry on with their lives.

 

[Outspoken]

Imago, the 2330 is simply an updated 2360 as I see it, however the exam/cert is not the issue, it is how it is being trained and awarded that is the problem, I believe (and I apologise if the view is incorrect) this is what E54 meant.

Training people up to a 2330 in short courses is not the answer, the course cannot have the same quality and voracity as one given as part of a true apprenticeship over 4-6 years with a real in depth understanding of the industry gained via vocational and academic training in tandem to compliment each other.

At the moment we have people being half trained on the academic aspects on a reduced length and foundation course who are not being trained effectively on the vocational aspects of the job.

I think in this all of use would agree this needs to change in order to bring standards back to the levels of the early 1970's to mid 1980's (when true apprenticeships stopped effectively).

 

[imago]

Outspoken, I do understand, and agree completely that the short courses aren't going to give the training that a '70s/'80s full aprenticeship would.

The thing is, it's not the '70s or '80s, and the type of electrician required then is (sadly I agree) no longer, or only in rare instances, required. The cutting down to areas or specialising has allowed similar cutting down in both pay and training required. The electrical trade is one of the few which covered such a wide range of subject areas that it could be broken down.

 

[Rockingit]

I'm sort of in agreement with everyone on this which is awkward - the merits of having 'full' (whatever that is) training to probably go on to work in only a few areas -v- starting out that way to start with and specialising (and I use the term loosely!) in the training.

Here's a thought for us all, though: I'm going to use Tony as an example, and only as an example, not because I'm in anyway trying to take a swing at him.......as I understand it his electrical background (which is significant and to be respected) pretty much centred from the earliest days as an apprentice in heavy industry. How much of his training was spent doing 'light' and buildings related installs, rewiring the burnt-out pub, running in new office lights, ripping up Mrs Jones' floorboards..etc? Because that's almost entirely what mine consisted of - and I couldn't even have told you where the nearest big factory was, let alone a foundry or similar. But both of us spent our time in the classroom, learning the same theories, doing the same maths, wondering who on earth would ever actually need to calculate flux losses in the real world (or whatever was the stupid lesson of the day).

So you've two apprentice trained, experienced sparks (albeit Tony has a few more years on me) with completely different backgrounds and skill-sets. Both equally fulfil the 'time served -v- Electrical Trainee' debate, yet we might just as well be from different planets. And I'd quite like to live on his.

(Tony - hope you know me well enough to get the sense of what I mean!)

 

[imago]

Which is where I'm coming from on this, I'm not suggesting that 'tailored' training is a good thing, you can never have too much knowledge. I'm merely suggesting that the 'full' training isn't allways necessary to do one role within the field. Therefore, and again I'm not saying it's a good thing, it is understandable that jobs and training have become narrower in their spec and the pay has dropped to account for that as well as market forces.

 

[Outspoken]

Outspoken, I do understand, and agree completely that the short courses aren't going to give the training that a '70s/'80s full aprenticeship would.

The thing is, it's not the '70s or '80s, and the type of electrician required then is (sadly I agree) no longer, or only in rare instances, required. The cutting down to areas or specialising has allowed similar cutting down in both pay and training required. The electrical trade is one of the few which covered such a wide range of subject areas that it could be broken down.

I'm sort of in agreement with everyone on this which is awkward - the merits of having 'full' (whatever that is) training to probably go on to work in only a few areas -v- starting out that way to start with and specialising (and I use the term loosely!) in the training.

Here's a thought for us all, though: I'm going to use Tony as an example, and only as an example, not because I'm in anyway trying to take a swing at him.......as I understand it his electrical background (which is significant and to be respected) pretty much centred from the earliest days as an apprentice in heavy industry. How much of his training was spent doing 'light' and buildings related installs, rewiring the burnt-out pub, running in new office lights, ripping up Mrs Jones' floorboards..etc? Because that's almost entirely what mine consisted of - and I couldn't even have told you where the nearest big factory was, let alone a foundry or similar. But both of us spent our time in the classroom, learning the same theories, doing the same maths, wondering who on earth would ever actually need to calculate flux losses in the real world (or whatever was the stupid lesson of the day).

So you've two apprentice trained, experienced sparks (albeit Tony has a few more years on me) with completely different backgrounds and skill-sets. Both equally fulfil the 'time served -v- Electrical Trainee' debate, yet we might just as well be from different planets. And I'd quite like to live on his.

(Tony - hope you know me well enough to get the sense of what I mean!)

I have quoted both posts as what I am about to say relates fully to both as I possibly have an insight that many others may not due to my careers path, and in essence any of us can only really speak about our own personal experiences with an definitive in depth knowledge.

Please bear with me on this an it is all relevant to my story.

When I was 8 my Dad bought me a pair of binoculars in one of his lucid sober moments due my absolute fascination with aircraft. using them to watch planes at night soon took me into a wholly different direction as I became fascinated by stars, and this is how my interest in Astronomy grew (bear with me). I began writing computer programs in 1980 with the Sinclair 80 blar blar, and eventually via my Astronomy connections and few cheeky letters I had written (no emails back then youngsters) I made contact with an Engineering Director at British Aerospace, by the time I was 12 I had taken and completed their aptitude test for an Engineering degree apprenticeship in Aerospace Engineering, the position was dependent on my successfully completing A levels at school.

For lots of reason I won't bore you all with here I bunked off the majority of the last two years I spent in normal education, however I still completed 4 A levels a year early (A- in Physics, B in Maths and English and a B- in Geography) not to mention 10 O levels all grades A+ to B-. However i needed to get my results to Bae by the 27th August 1983 for intake that year (and the intake only happened every 2 years). I was busy enjoying the Summer of 1983 and spending time with friends playing cricket or my grandfather taking about WWII and his time in the Army up to his retirement in the late 1960's. I ****ed up, I got my exams late because the School was closed when I finally went there and Bae did not receive my results until the first week of September, so I had to get a Job...

I contacted a local Electrical Contractor via the Job Centre and had an interview on the Friday at 15:00hrs, started on the Monday at 07:30hrs. This was what drove me into this industry..and I feel this is important because the motivations for being in the Industry can sometimes determine the Electrician or Engineer we become.

I was determined not to make the same mistake again I had with Bae, so I through myself into the work. I studied hard, I ensured I got 100% for all homework and as near as damn 100% in classroom work. I spent as many hours as I could working with as many different electricians as I could, most were self -employed back then, and whenever the company took on work that was different to the normal, I would volunteer to go to the Job...not always successfully.

I completed my 236 part, Part 2 and the company paid for me to do the 236 C certificate (what is now the Level 4 NVQ I believe). I also paid for myself to start a HNC in Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the local polytechnic. I was fortunate, due to my desire to work and abilities I was always helping sparks with their private Jobs, I was earning my £28 per week from my fully Indentured apprentice pay, but my bosses were paying me overtime out of their pockets by the back door, and the sparks were paying me cash to work with them out of hours when I was not at College/Poly. I was earning up to £500 a week from around mid 1984 as an average.

The company worked on Domestic, commercial and Industrial, and made sure all the apprentices spent time working in all areas of the Industry to give us a fully rounded experience and training. By the time I was in my third year and doing my part 2 course I could easily have rewired a house on my own, although I never did, could do all the tray, ladder rack and conduit work asked of me, was often left to terminate SWA's, Pyro's and mains intakes. I had spent time in the Office on the management side of the work, because it was deemed important to learn, and often given new apprentices to complete simple installs that initially were verified by the qualified sparks, but eventually they gave up and simply tested them along with everything else.

Family problems meant I needed to get away in 1989 and so I went to Canada for a holiday to stay with a family friend who had taken on his Dads business following his death about 10 years previous. Instead of staying for 3 weeks, I stayed for 5 years, and worked for Bill all over the US and Canada. I worked on Oil Platforms, Oil exploration Platforms, ships, boats, marina, dockyards, lumber mills, foundries and in temperatures that ranged from +50°C in the desert areas to -75°C in Alaska (below -50°C we had to stop work!). Visa problem with the US meant that work had to stop for a while and I returned to the UK...and have been back ever since.

Since being back I have worked in Domestic installs, rewired numerous Land of Leather and similar shops. undertook work in France for Lord Harris, repaired generators in Africa and worked on the ESO sites in Chille's Atacama desert at some 2400m altitude. I spent a number of years as a building services engineer maintaining buildings in London, getting to know all aspects of the built environment and adapting my skill set to suit and to learn new tasks and roles. I now work in the specialist area of Critical data centres and get involved in the commissioning and IST testing, and hope soon to move into the design side of things.

Now I suspect your all thinking, "Great Jim, but relevance..." The relevance is that I completed a full and complete apprenticeship, I was taught all aspects of the Job as part of that learning process because it was all relevant Without the level and standard of training I received I would never have been able to move from one industry to the next with such ease, would have struggled to understand how many of the systems worked and were integrated and why such integration and control is important. This is the point with the fragmented industry we are faced with today, and the serious dumming down of the skill set many are being stuck with. You are effectively forcing people to only work in one area of the industry, domestic or commercial or industrial. It should not be a forced issue, but one where people feel most comfortable for their interests and abilities. If we start to pigeon hole people so they are effectively trapped then they will lose interest in the job, they will do sloppy work and they will leave the industry, causing a potential further loss of skills and experience.

This is why we need to return to full, in depth and structured apprenticeships that give people a high quality and voracious training regime, weedle out those who are not up to standard, encourage and support those with the ability to progress and ensure that the training for all is broad ranging, academically and vocationally because that way we can justifiable say we will bring standards back to were they should be.

This is a dangerous industry that the authorities, the regulators and public have developed a complacency for, sooner or later people will die in a way that will cause a kneejerk reaction, as happened to bring in Part P"rescott" and whilst we in the industry just bend over and accept this we will continue to see this dumming down and salaries falling as a result.

The decision is yours ladies and gentlemen.

 

[Knobhead]

Rock, I don’t mind that at all.

I’ll tell everyone I’m no bloody good at domestic!

 

[MDJ]

I’ll tell everyone I’m no bloody good at domestic!

Ah your a proper spark then :biggrin5:

 

[Outspoken]

Rock, I don’t mind that at all.

I’ll tell everyone I’m no bloody good at domestic!

The wife did say she always has to do the chores about the house!

 

[Knobhead]

So where did you want this socket?

I've done a grand total of 5 domestic installs in 40 years. Bloody family, I will say they were all top notch installs.

I dread to think how the guy that bought my first house went on with it.

Four 230V RFC's
Two 110V RFC's
Only one 130V DC RFC
Two contactor panels
Four CU's
I can't leave out the DC powered crane in the loft.
15KV test bed. (No I didn't tie the wife to it!)

I used to get bored!

 

[Geordie Spark]

I wonder where the OP has been hiding while all this banter has been going on ???

 

[Knobhead]

Hiding under his solid oak desk?

 

[Rockingit]

I used to get bored!

Announcement from the dept of the bleedin' obvious!!

 

[Engineer54]

Make your mind up!



Either the 2330 is a lesser qualification and a waste of my time, or its a core requirement for every electrician.

To be honest I can't be bothered arguing anymore. If anyone has the temerity to take a different view to your own you throw all your toys out of the pram. If they still don't back down you start contradicting yourself in an attempt to prove a point.

Things have moved on, many of us don't think it's for the better or like the changes. Some accept that progress isn't allways good and get on with it. Some moan their faces off on a forum and try to belittle anyone who takes a different view or route to theirs. So you carry on moaning and tilting at windmills, I'll carry on earning a living, and so will the evil training providers and dodgy 5 week wonders.

I'll bet that while all that is going on there won't be a sudden increase in electrocutions, the job of an electrician will continue to have several definitions, society will not come to an end, and the majority of people will carry on with their lives.

Perhaps you can explain exactly where i have backtracked or contradicted myself?? If your still talking about the 2360 and the 2330, it's either or, not both for god's sake!! Though in your case, why anyone would bother taking the 2330, when already holding a full 2360 B/C is just totally beyond me!!

I too can't be bothered arguing anymore with you, it clearly isn't worth it, your basically arguing for arguments sake!! Trying to convince us that it's fine that electricians don't need the training they once had, because we live in different times, ...that is just total nonsense. Perhaps you can explain why this isn't the case in France, Germany, Netherlands, (and a good few more in western Europe) where there electricians training regime is improving with the times rather than being whittled away?? But then our European cousins don't have anything like our 17 day/electrical trainee training courses, they are just not as bloody stupid as the UK.

Burying your head in the sand, will sooner rather than later bite you hard in the arse!!

 

[Engineer54]

I'm sort of in agreement with everyone on this which is awkward - the merits of having 'full' (whatever that is) training to probably go on to work in only a few areas -v- starting out that way to start with and specialising (and I use the term loosely!) in the training.

Here's a thought for us all, though: I'm going to use Tony as an example, and only as an example, not because I'm in anyway trying to take a swing at him.......as I understand it his electrical background (which is significant and to be respected) pretty much centred from the earliest days as an apprentice in heavy industry. How much of his training was spent doing 'light' and buildings related installs, rewiring the burnt-out pub, running in new office lights, ripping up Mrs Jones' floorboards..etc? Because that's almost entirely what mine consisted of - and I couldn't even have told you where the nearest big factory was, let alone a foundry or similar. But both of us spent our time in the classroom, learning the same theories, doing the same maths, wondering who on earth would ever actually need to calculate flux losses in the real world (or whatever was the stupid lesson of the day).

So you've two apprentice trained, experienced sparks (albeit Tony has a few more years on me) with completely different backgrounds and skill-sets. Both equally fulfil the 'time served -v- Electrical Trainee' debate, yet we might just as well be from different planets. And I'd quite like to live on his.

(Tony - hope you know me well enough to get the sense of what I mean!)

The difference being, that he could and did turn his hand to Domestic work, a domestic electrician (which it seems, all we are churning out of our colleges now) would have a hard time turning they're hand too heavy industrial work etc!! Changing times should mean that today's college students should be getting ''Better'' training than the likes of Tony and Myself, not limited, or inferior training...

 

[Rockingit]

The difference being, that he could and did turn his hand to Domestic work, a domestic electrician (which it seems, all we are churning out of our colleges now) would have a hard time turning they're hand too heavy industrial work etc!! Changing times should mean that today's college students should be getting ''Better'' training than the likes of Tony and Myself, not limited, or inferior training...

OK, that's a fine principal, but my point earlier is that his apprenticeship didn't cover the 'cannon fodder' kind of stuff, mine didn't cover heavy industrial but both were equally valid in their own merits. And to play devils advocate, given my other earlier remark, I've not been in a plant environment, none that I know of exist around my area....so had I have been taught those skills back then, by now they would be rusty at best and I'd be a danger trying to use them, therefore what's the point in 'knowing' them?

 

[Toonlad]

Its a funny old world this sparky stuff, I served my time in the shipyards, Swan Hunters back in the day,working on merchant and MOD ships, attention to details was a must. As an apprentice we got bounced around 4 yards and worked on different ships. We had to do plant maintenance, fixing the cranes, welding sets,generators, undercutting motors etc. They had there own instrument tech, and we had to work with him and calibrate meters and other equipment. At college we covered domestic aswell as the marine modules.

We had the influx of miners, who our shop stewards got them into the union (eetpu) at the time. This was my first eye opener, They came with there card NUM, it covered everyone, from faceworkers to templights etc. Then some of these said they were electricians through the NUM, and now got full electrician status through the shop stewards,this was a complete slap in the face for lots of sparks at the time.What could you do or say, it was my own union moving the goal posts.

At this point i realised that becoming an electrician, was going to become easier over the years, and any loopholes, through training providers, colleges,employers would be exploited. It is now down to 5 weeks in essence now.

This being said and done, I had a well rounded 4 yr apprenticeship, and would do well on other work like domestics. Redundancies start I move on.

I couldnt get a fix straight away, as a lot of sites wouldnt take yard workers, they thought they were crap, and couldnt wire a plug. I got a fix on a site, and applied for a JIB card, took 3 yrs before they granted me my approved. Then I see an old school mate, who was a posty, done 2 yrs city and guilds courses, got his brother in law who was the contracts manager and he got a JIB card, and was deemed a electrician.

So from early 80s, and had seen two ways of people getting electrician status. Other than doing an apprenticeship and getting there indentures.

These fast track ways have always been there in one shape or another, its just now its more openly promoted, and is backed by governing bodies. As Craftsmen/tradesmen/technicians/engineers. We have only our selves to blame. It is us that have lowered the bar, it is us who have let them get away with it.

I used to be quite proud of calling my self a time served electrician, now that does not seem to matter anymore.

Im sure there is some relevance in my post somewhere.

 

[Engineer54]

OK, that's a fine principal, but my point earlier is that his apprenticeship didn't cover the 'cannon fodder' kind of stuff, mine didn't cover heavy industrial but both were equally valid in their own merits. And to play devils advocate, given my other earlier remark, I've not been in a plant environment, none that I know of exist around my area....so had I have been taught those skills back then, by now they would be rusty at best and I'd be a danger trying to use them, therefore what's the point in 'knowing' them?

Using that analogy, would mean that electricians only need to be trained for the local conditions in which they live. God help you, if you move away from that area into an industrial /semi industrial area, or the like!! I can't think of any educational College or otherwise qualification, that would limit the curriculum based on local conditions. They are and always have been based on a national standard curriculum set by whatever educational institute the qualification paper is set by. Any electrical training (and it's final qualification) should be such, that it provides the student with a good all round technical foundation on which to start your career.

 

[Geordie Spark]

Its a funny old world this sparky stuff, I served my time in the shipyards, Swan Hunters back in the day,working on merchant and MOD ships, attention to details was a must. As an apprentice we got bounced around 4 yards and worked on different ships. We had to do plant maintenance, fixing the cranes, welding sets,generators, undercutting motors etc. They had there own instrument tech, and we had to work with him and calibrate meters and other equipment. At college we covered domestic aswell as the marine modules.

We had the influx of miners, who our shop stewards got them into the union (eetpu) at the time. This was my first eye opener, They came with there card NUM, it covered everyone, from faceworkers to templights etc. Then some of these said they were electricians through the NUM, and now got full electrician status through the shop stewards,this was a complete slap in the face for lots of sparks at the time.What could you do or say, it was my own union moving the goal posts.

At this point i realised that becoming an electrician, was going to become easier over the years, and any loopholes, through training providers, colleges,employers would be exploited. It is now down to 5 weeks in essence now.

This being said and done, I had a well rounded 4 yr apprenticeship, and would do well on other work like domestics. Redundancies start I move on.

I couldnt get a fix straight away, as a lot of sites wouldnt take yard workers, they thought they were crap, and couldnt wire a plug. I got a fix on a site, and applied for a JIB card, took 3 yrs before they granted me my approved. Then I see an old school mate, who was a posty, done 2 yrs city and guilds courses, got his brother in law who was the contracts manager and he got a JIB card, and was deemed a electrician.

So from early 80s, and had seen two ways of people getting electrician status. Other than doing an apprenticeship and getting there indentures.

These fast track ways have always been there in one shape or another, its just now its more openly promoted, and is backed by governing bodies. As Craftsmen/tradesmen/technicians/engineers. We have only our selves to blame. It is us that have lowered the bar, it is us who have let them get away with it.

I used to be quite proud of calling my self a time served electrician, now that does not seem to matter anymore.

Im sure there is some relevance in my post somewhere.

Respect to you bonny lad.

I had 3 ex-Swan's lads working for me - a Driller, a Pipefitter & a Caulker/Burner. Good grafters & very handy to take with me when I had to visit customers who were a bit slow in paying the bill ......

 

[ricardo123]

I'd like to put down my two pence worth on this subject, I apologise if this has already been said as I have only made it up to post 110 (so far).

At the end of the day these schemes make money by getting more members to join their said scheme. So it is in their interests to dumb down the standards required to join a scheme as they will make more money hence the Electrical Trainee. They would possibly be happy if they could get it down to a 1 day course to be an electrician before joining as they will make more money.

My second point is that being a charity these days can be meaningless. Some companies now register as charities not because they are real charities but because of the benefits to making more money it brings. I am not suggesting any scheme has done this but just being registered as a charity does not make a company altruistic.

My third point is that the current schemes are making it harder for people like myself to want to work for other companies, such as facilities management companies, as they want to employ a QS to sign off unskilled tradesmen's work. They are not bothered whether the quality is great so long as the number of jobs completed is high, this puts pressure on qualified people like myself to sign anything off even when we know it's possibly substandard.

Unfortunately the schemes in my opinion have been the single biggest cause for a lowering of electrical standards since I can remember.

 

[Geordie Spark]

There's still no sign of the OP lads 'n' lasses ....... I do hope he's looking in and taking all of this on board !!!

 

[SirKit Breaker]

I have had a recent conversation regarding this from a very very reliable source. Just to really pee you off, to get onto this register you will need as a minimum to have served a recognised apprenticeship, hold the latest 17th edition qualification, hold both C&G 2394 and 2395 or equivalent, hold 2391 but have a plan in place to get 2394 and 2395. The industry is out to kill the cowboys, but how many good sparks with grandfather rights will be killed in the process?

Cheers.............Howard

 

[Engineer54]

I have had a recent conversation regarding this from a very very reliable source. Just to really pee you off, to get onto this register you will need as a minimum to have served a recognised apprenticeship, hold the latest 17th edition qualification, hold both C&G 2394 and 2395 or equivalent, hold 2391 but have a plan in place to get 2394 and 2395. The industry is out to kill the cowboys, but how many good sparks with grandfather rights will be killed in the process?

Cheers.............Howard

who's this source that's making up the rules before anyone has even had a chance to review or comment on them?? For a kick off, you cannot take away/deny ''Grandfather Rights'' as they are called. Even the JIB tried that one on and failed!!... The way you are describing things here, is that there will only be one grade of registered electrician, and that can't be and never will be the case. There will also be a real need, to bring the registry in over at least a 3 year period, to allow those that don't presently have the required minimal qualifications and/or experience, time to fulfill minimum requirements to gain entry.

 

[Knobhead]

I have had a recent conversation regarding this from a very very reliable source. Just to really pee you off, to get onto this register you will need as a minimum to have served a recognised apprenticeship, hold the latest 17th edition qualification, hold both C&G 2394 and 2395 or equivalent, hold 2391 but have a plan in place to get 2394 and 2395. The industry is out to kill the cowboys, but how many good sparks with grandfather rights will be killed in the process?

Cheers.............Howard

So who is going to run this utopian scheme?
Don’t get me wrong Howard it would be a good move, but only if divorced from the existing schemes and the JIB.
As I see it only government intervention could get this implemented. As I said earlier, it would need a charter to give it teeth.

 

[Engineer54]

So who is going to run this utopian scheme?
Don’t get me wrong Howard it would be a good move, but only if divorced from the existing schemes and the JIB.
As I see it only government intervention could get this implemented. As I said earlier, it would need a charter to give it teeth.

It'll need to be ''TOTALLY'' divorced from any of the existing scheme providers, if it has any chance at all of working!!

Letting any of those jokers have anything to do with it, will be like yet another cash cow organisation let loose on the industry!! And probably change nothing in the process, and probably even lead to further degradation of the industry!!

 

[Outspoken]

I have had a recent conversation regarding this from a very very reliable source. Just to really pee you off, to get onto this register you will need as a minimum to have served a recognised apprenticeship, hold the latest 17th edition qualification, hold both C&G 2394 and 2395 or equivalent, hold 2391 but have a plan in place to get 2394 and 2395. The industry is out to kill the cowboys, but how many good sparks with grandfather rights will be killed in the process?

Cheers.............Howard

This is total nonsense , the 2391 qualification was an NICEIC created spunk dream that they attempted to foist on the industry to cover up that they had reduced the standards and were simply interested in making money.

I have said this countless time in the past and I will say it till the day I die..

Any fully apprenticed and trained electrician knows when an installation is or is not compliant or safe, if they do not then they are a flipping plumber, as such the 2391 is a cash cow cert designed to create division in the industry by the scam providers.

To attack those with so called "Grandfather rights" would be a mistake, many of these Guys are the real professionals in the industry because they learnt the trade on the tools and the hard way, they need to concentrate on improving standards the HONEST way by having Electrical Trainee courses and 17th ed only courses BANNED because these put lives at risk every day, but the reality is they will not because this would cost them revenue..

 

[Rockingit]

And now, this thread has descended from Electrical Trainee -v- timeserved to which timeserved's got the biggest knob. And you wonder why in-fighting has been the death of the trade?!

 

[KingKenny]

You know reading these posts it looks like Electrical Trainee v Timed Served but that's not how I see it looks to me the problem is the ever growing monster that basically must be fed and it does not care where it gets its money from and yes I mean the Schemies who in my view have saturated and diluted the trade. Now I realise that apprenticeships are no longer going about and there are guys wanting to enter the trade as mature trainers fine but the current environment where people have no hope with regards to jobs are saying thats it I am going to change my life and all the schemes are bothered about is selling them courses and registering them.

Now that premise sounds ok but the problem we have is the title electrician so in my view the Scheme system can be good as say a modern apprenticeship system were an Individual does 6 months training and then are grade as Domestic electricians with supervision from the Scheme.

I haven't read this whole thread, yet, so apologies in advance ...... To nail my colours to the mast ..... I'm possibly what many on here would term a Electrical Trainee (except that my course was spread out over 24 months of home study with training/assessment weeks rather than as an intensive course - That's by the by though, I think). I'm what I'd describe as a reasonably intelligent 50 year old, who spent most of my life in IT. Way back when, I was taken out of school as a 15 year old by my Dad and started work as an apprentice fitter - I lasted 18 months - I hated it and, if I'm honest, I was crap, so I quit and went back to school. BUT in my time in this firm .... I very much understood the value of apprenticeships, the honesty of work, the respect for those who know more than you do (they're not ALWAYS older by the way!) and the value and importance of turning out the highest quality work you can to the best of your ability............
So fast forward 30 odd years - I sign up to a training scheme, with reservations, and I'm a last training week away from 'qualifying' (deliberate quotes). The quality of the training on-site has been very very good, but I'm not a mug - I've been on site for a very small amount of time, learning from the masters, so to speak. I've worked very very hard to pass the exams I have during the course (2382-20, Part P and 2377). The first (2382) I'm proud of passing - I got ONE question wrong and that was a typo, the second (Regs) is useful only in that it makes me think whenever I'm on a new job as to what is good practice, the last (PAT Testing), I'll never use. I'll certainly follow this up with a Testing C&G 2391 level 3 or similar in the next 9 months or so. Do I consider myself to be a 'qualified electrician'? Of course I don't!!!!! But I certainly DO consider myself good enough to do most (important, this!) Domestic electrical work using the technical principles I've learned over the last 2 years and aligning these with the principles embedded into me over 30 years ago. I'm an honest person. I would never, EVER, knowingly endanger anyone in work that I'd do - I'm one of these people we talk about that would lie awake at night worrying if I think I've done something wrong. My point, at last, is that when I think the time is right for me to be assessed to join a CPS, when I've gained enough experience in the field, worked with experienced guys I know, got good advice on here and elsewhere - at LEAST another year ahead IMO, when I've been paid by clients and I've paid Building Control and NIC qualified guys to sign off my jobs as correct so the customer can get the certification they deserve, why should I be penalised by not being allowed to join an exclusive self-cert club because I haven't been trained 'in the right way'? To me that doesn't make sense. If I get assessed by NIC or Elecsafe or whatever they're going to be called, and I pass, and I get assessed every year, and pass, then what exactly is the problem? If they say 'Sorry, we're not even going to assess you because .....' then that's just not right IMO. I GET and agree with what they're trying to do, but there are good guys who will fall through the gaps, and not just those with Grandfather rights.

 

[KingKenny]

Oh! - And if anyone could tell me how to get the damned return key to register so I can format my posts correctly, that'd help...

 

[DJ Ovengloves]

Personally I don't feel there's an issue with people doing short "fast track" courses that are limited in scope - as long as the people taking them know their own limitations and these limitations are known to the public.

The problem is that in many, many cases, the Electrical Trainee as they "like" to be called here will take a short course, pass the required exams and will do jobs they are not prepared for - dangerously.

Poor old competent spark (whether they are timed served or not) gets undercut and poor old Joe Public gets a false sense of security on a dangerous install.

 

[Engineer54]

Personally I don't feel there's an issue with people doing short "fast track" courses that are limited in scope - as long as the people taking them know their own limitations and these limitations are known to the public.

The problem is that in many, many cases, the Electrical Trainee as they "like" to be called here will take a short course, pass the required exams and will do jobs they are not prepared for - dangerously.

Poor old competent spark (whether they are timed served or not) gets undercut and poor old Joe Public gets a false sense of security on a dangerous install.

If you don't have an issue, you dam well should!! And if for nothing else for the very reasons you give in your post!!

Limited scope is what the plumbers and kitchen fitters have, NOT the 17 day/Electrical Trainee fast track guys. They can undertake any domestic work they choose!! ...And that only relates to Domestic, so these wannabees can undertake any commercial and or industrial work they want to, as they don't have any restrictions in these areas, except for the word ''Competent''!! Far too many actually think they are fully qualified, and as such competent too. You get these guy's coming on here stating that they will only take on work within their limitations, ...personally i don't believe a word of it!!

The public have no idea who they are employing, as these scheme providers tar all it's registered members with the same make believe title of ''Domestic Installer''. I believe the public has been taken for as much of a ride, as the trained electricians have, with this Part Pee crap and the rise of the training centres that basically serve to boost the revenue of the scheme providers....

No we have to put an end to these fast track training centres, and as soon as feasibly possible too!!

 

[Spoon]

If you don't have an issue, you dam well should!! And if for nothing else for the very reasons you give in your post!!

Limited scope is what the plumbers and kitchen fitters have, NOT the 17 day/Electrical Trainee fast track guys. They can undertake any domestic work they choose!! ...And that only relates to Domestic, so these wannabees can undertake any commercial and or industrial work they want to, as they don't have any restrictions in these areas, except for the word ''Competent''!! Far too many actually think they are fully qualified, and as such competent too. You get these guy's coming on here stating that they will only take on work within their limitations, ...personally i don't believe a word of it!!

The public have no idea who they are employing, as these scheme providers tar all it's registered members with the same make believe title of ''Domestic Installer''. I believe the public has been taken for as much of a ride, as the trained electricians have, with this Part Pee crap and the rise of the training centres that basically serve to boost the revenue of the scheme providers....

No we have to put an end to these fast track training centres, and as soon as feasibly possible too!!

What should the public look out for or ask when they are looking for a person to do some work on their house? I dont fully know...

 

[Engineer54]

What should the public look out for or ask when they are looking for a person to do some work on their house? I dont fully know...

Exactly my point!!

 

[Silly Sausage]

While you're on the subject on training & education in Britain, check this out...
BBC News - Heavy metal degree is a 'waste of time' claim campaigners !
I mean, come on, the whole thing is becoming a total farce!!!

 

[Engineer54]

While you're on the subject on training & education in Britain, check this out...
BBC News - Heavy metal degree is a 'waste of time' claim campaigners !
I mean, come on, the whole thing is becoming a total farce!!!

Far too many easy option Degree's out there, in daft subjects that are basically good for nothing. They should be whittled right back, to make more room for the meaningful occupational Degree courses, that both the employers and students need, as well as the country as a whole!!!!

 

[Spoon]

Thanks for the reply Eng54 but it was a genuine question.
So people. What do you think the general public should look out for and ask when wanting an electrician?
There is not much point in us saying that the public dont know what to do if we are not going to teach them.

 

[Engineer54]

Thanks for the reply Eng54 but it was a genuine question.
So people. What do you think the general public should look out for and ask when wanting an electrician?
There is not much point in us saying that the public dont know what to do if we are not going to teach them.

I know, and so was my reply.

Other than asking the electrician straight out and hoping for an honest answer, not much else, as far as i can see. You could i suppose ask to see his qualifications and note the numbers and the dates, but i'm not sure how many electricians would wear that!! lol!!


As i say the public have been sold a pup, as much as the qualified electrician has by the scheme providers, and their laughing all the way to the bank!!

 

[Geordie Spark]

I know, and so was my reply.

Other than asking the electrician straight out and hoping for an honest answer, not much else, as far as i can see. You could i suppose ask to see his qualifications and note the numbers and the dates, but i'm not sure how many electricians would wear that!! lol!!


As i say the public have been sold a pup, as much as the qualified electrician has by the scheme providers, and their laughing all the way to the bank!!

Back in the day, I was CORGI registered and had the card to prove it.

Customers are supposed to ask to see it before letting you loose on their property.

I can honestly say I was NEVER asked by a customer if I had one.

 

[KingKenny]

If you don't have an issue, you dam well should!! And if for nothing else for the very reasons you give in your post!!

Limited scope is what the plumbers and kitchen fitters have, NOT the 17 day/Electrical Trainee fast track guys. They can undertake any domestic work they choose!! ...And that only relates to Domestic, so these wannabees can undertake any commercial and or industrial work they want to, as they don't have any restrictions in these areas, except for the word ''Competent''!! Far too many actually think they are fully qualified, and as such competent too. You get these guy's coming on here stating that they will only take on work within their limitations, ...personally i don't believe a word of it!!

The public have no idea who they are employing, as these scheme providers tar all it's registered members with the same make believe title of ''Domestic Installer''. I believe the public has been taken for as much of a ride, as the trained electricians have, with this Part Pee crap and the rise of the training centres that basically serve to boost the revenue of the scheme providers....

No we have to put an end to these fast track training centres, and as soon as feasibly possible too!!

I guarantee you, 100%, that if a job is outside my comfortable ability to understand, action and test, I won't take it on.

 

[Knobhead]

I guarantee you, 100%, that if a job is outside my comfortable ability to understand, action and test, I won't take it on.

I applaud you if you stick to that resolution.

I’d be happier if you were legally bound to it.

There are far too many that think they can tackle the world, they need legally restraining!

 

[Engineer54]

I applaud you if you stick to that resolution.

I’d be happier if you were legally bound to it.

There are far too many that think they can tackle the world, they need legally restraining!

I think Tony has hit the nail squarely on the head with the hammer on this one.

 

[imago]

I applaud you if you stick to that resolution.

I’d be happier if you were legally bound to it.

There are far too many that think they can tackle the world, they need legally restraining!

I can't argue with that to be honest.