Well the test results for that EICR appear to be believable at first glance.

I'd say either the Zs or R1+R2 are calculated as they all have exactly the same difference, but this is permitted by the regulations (personally I don't agree with it, but it is perfectly acceptable)

What is surprising is the complete lack of any comment on an installation which is apparently 20 years old, you'd expect there to be something even if its just general wear and tear.

They haven't ticked the box for alterations/additions to the installation but that CU can't be more than a few years old (I'm pretty sure that CU wasn't even manufactured 10 years ago, let alone 20)

Id say on the balance of probability that EICR hasn't been carried out with the due care and attention that it should have been.
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Email
Joined
Time zone
Last seen

Thread Information

Title
Fraudulent EICR, who to contact?
Prefix
NAPIT Certification Scheme 
Forum
Certification NICEIC, NAPIT, Stroma, BECSA Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
21

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
AlureofSugar,
Last reply from
davesparks,
Replies
21
Views
8,750

Advert