If it was a full rewire…. Why was there wallpaper over that patched wall?

It just looks very DIY with filler like that around the socket.
I was going to suggest to check that wasn’t a spur from a spur or something silly, but then I realised which thread this was.

Full (?) rewire?

Still want to see what the consumer unit looks like.

Take Tel up on his offer… he will be able to tell walking into the place whether it’s been a good job or not… no need to dismantle anything really.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jim_e_Jib
For a decent plaster finish the cable should be about 5mm beneath the surface of the wall. Then filled up with filler ready for the thin plaster top finish

That cable is too proud and will need chopping in a bit more
Thank you for your response. This gives me a little more confidence. The chasing in on the walls is generally a bit better than in this image and I did see the wires which all appeared intact. There are more junctions which have bare metal wire, I will get images later.
I need to consider my options carefully. I am not out to destroy anybody's reputation and I would prefer to leave my house as intact as possible. Any advice on how to move forward would be greatly appreciated
If it was a full rewire…. Why was there wallpaper over that patched wall?

It just looks very DIY with filler like that around the socket.
I was going to suggest to check that wasn’t a spur from a spur or something silly, but then I realised which thread this was.

Full (?) rewire?

Still want to see what the consumer unit looks like.

Take Tel up on his offer… he will be able to tell walking into the place whether it’s been a good job or not… no need to dismantle anything really.
Thank you so much. I have attached images of the consumer unit. What I have not explained so far is that the main contractor left his son and an apprentice on the job. His son assured me he was qualified/experienced and I trusted what he said. I am not out to damage anybody's reputation but just want as much fact as possible before taking the next step. I will get Tel to look over it and give me a second opinion. I am hoping it is not as bad as it appears and can be rectified without tearing my house apart again.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220121_143257_298.jpg
    IMG_20220121_143257_298.jpg
    305.9 KB · Views: 169
  • IMG_20220121_143308_585.jpg
    IMG_20220121_143308_585.jpg
    367 KB · Views: 169
Let the scheme deal with it glad they have given you a positive response.
 
That trunking at the top of the consumer unit is rough.
 
Now I will throw my hat in the the ring.
1) was it a recommendation.
2) was the firm Napit or other.
3) Did you pay for a contract.
5) was a deposit paid.
Me has above get independent spark in
EICR see what is says, tell the company
You going to pay them to sort out the bad workand see them in court. And inform traders in standed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megawatt
That trunking at the top of the consumer unit is rough.
A close up if the bottom of the consumer unit would also be interesting, to see what sort of a gland or grommet they have used - hopefully it is not cables resting on the sharp edge of the metal.
 
OP have you received any test certificates?
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Dustydazzler
Worth noting that even if you post a very good standard of work on this forum its going to get some criticism.

That said, that doesn't look like a very good standard of work at all from any of the photo's so far, it'll be interesting to see what actions, if any, the scheme takes.
 
Worth noting that even if you post a very good standard of work on this forum its going to get some criticism.

That said, that doesn't look like a very good standard of work at all from any of the photo's so far, it'll be interesting to see what actions, if any, the scheme takes.

A lashed joint like that with all the cores hanging out has never been acceptable , even rough old electricians would have wrapped it in some tape
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megawatt
That trunking at the top of the consumer unit is rough.
Not as rough as the tails.....with T&E clips....well, perhaps not.
 
Last edited:
I'd love to see inside that board but not worth the OP risking taking the cover off . Work of this standard really infuriates me ,I genuinely feel sorry for the OP, particularly with the history and sentimental value of the house.
 
What makes it worse is the OP hired an 'electrician' to do the re-wire and this is the dogs breakfast they got.

I could understand the mess if they hired a builder or plumber to do the re-wire but not from a trained electrician.

This industry especially the domestic sector has gone to the dogs and the rough work I see on a regular basis done by so called cps sparks is terrifying.
I even saw a bypassed rcd the other day done by a so called cps sparks. This has to be an all time low for the industry.

I have tried reporting these imposters to the scams in the past but nothing ever happens and the homeowner just ends up paying me or someone else to re-do the work.

Shame
 
What makes it worse is the OP hired an 'electrician' to do the re-wire and this is the dogs breakfast they got.

I could understand the mess if they hired a builder or plumber to do the re-wire but not from a trained electrician.

This industry especially the domestic sector has gone to the dogs and the rough work I see on a regular basis done by so called cps sparks is terrifying.
I even saw a bypassed rcd the other day done by a so called cps sparks. This has to be an all time low for the industry.

I have tried reporting these imposters to the scams in the past but nothing ever happens and the homeowner just ends up paying me or someone else to re-do the work.

Shame

I'm inclined to agree but, no matter what sort of training this 'electrician' undertook, they'll have known full well that such work is unacceptable.
 
You can ask the NICEIC to perform an inspection (they may ask you to pay initially but you can use their inspectors report as evidence in court)

Did the contractor give you a written quote with a 14 day cooling off period (if not you can ask - through court -for your money back)
 
Absolute crap work....Report them..Name and shame and dont pay...Threaten them with court and make sure no other poor unsuspecting person uses them ever again ....This has to stop
 
A close up if the bottom of the consumer unit would also be interesting, to see what sort of a gland or grommet they have used - hopefully it is not cables resting on the sharp edge of the metal.
That was also my though. If the exposed joints are typical of the "workmanship" then a lack of proper cable protection/support is not going to surprise me :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Megawatt
Of course everybody is assuming that the exposed terminals are part of the rewire and not the original wiring.
Just saying.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: James
Agreed but even if they are original and now unused cables, I would expect to see them in an enclosure
 
Of course everybody is assuming that the exposed terminals are part of the rewire and not the original wiring.
Just saying.
Even if by some twist of fate that birds nest joint was the original wiring , Imo any sparks worth their salt during a full rewire should of at very least put it all in a choc box or adaptable box
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPG and James
That's not really suitable for a joint under the floorboards either though🧐
Agreed - and I also think Dusty must be using a very expensive wholesaler ! 🙂
 
That must be the same wholesaler frequented by Artifarty electrics eh ? 🤣
 
Joint boxes….. floorboards….. I sense a monty python sketch coming…

Luxury…. Bloody luxury
 
I have to say after reading through the thread from the start until the picture of the consumer unit, I was fully expecting to see a BG split load board.
 
I have to say after reading through the thread from the start until the picture of the consumer unit, I was fully expecting to see a BG split load board.

Haha I was going to say the exact same thing, as soon as you see a BG split load board with no SPD on a new consumer unit you know its gunna be rough... Cheapest consumer unit Screwfix sell.

Personally I just don't give customers the choice, I fit Hager, if they want something cheaper they can go with someone else, clearly this is the result.. Worst thing for the OP is I bet they weren't cheap either.. I know as electricians we always moan about other peoples work as we all like to do things our own way etc but I think we can unanimously all agree that is as rough as old boots, how have these people been allowed to continue in the industry, I blame the CPS's, NICEIC should not be suggesting the customer make an official complaint to the company, with such poor workmanship they should be coming out and checking and then chucking that company out of their scheme and banning that person from joining and telling NAPIT about him so he cant join them.. But of course they just want their money..
 
Haha I was going to say the exact same thing, as soon as you see a BG split load board with no SPD on a new consumer unit you know its gunna be rough... Cheapest consumer unit Screwfix sell.
Just reading the Toolstation flyer that arrived by post offering "18th edtition" Contactum CUs dual RCD without SPD. Really?
 
1. SPDs are optional,not mandatory.
2. I've fitted dozens of BG dual RCD CUs and they've been fine. only gripe is cover can be a bit awkward to fit.

might not be the best quality, but ranks high on the value for money scale.
 
another small gripe is the internal tails feeding the RCDs. in the wqy. i usually take them out to wire in the circuis, then refit them after. sometimes i even get them in the right order.
 
  • Funny
  • Like
Reactions: Timbo and timhoward
Just reading the Toolstation flyer that arrived by post offering "18th edtition" Contactum CUs dual RCD without SPD. Really?
DIY market , it is huge. A few months ago I looked at a job where the retired home owner attempted his own board change purchased on sale from Toolstation but one of his RCDs kept tripping out. He couldn't find the borrowed N on the lighting
 
  • Like
Reactions: pc1966
1. SPDs are optional,not mandatory.
True, but if not fitted there should be a risk assessment to justify it. Which I doubt happens in most cases.

My gripe is more about the stupid "18th edition" naming. You could argue that "17th amendment 3" makes sense for the metal CU that became a requirement then, but if calling it "18th" then what was added if it is not the SPD?
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Exposed copper wire under the floorboards after rewire
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
100

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
JanWilson,
Last reply from
Dave OCD,
Replies
100
Views
11,893

Advert