Discuss Neutral isolation for TT supply in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

It's needed wherever isolation for maintenance or safety is required.
Boiler, cooker, extractor fan, etc.
Single pole RCBOs, are acceptable, as long as there is up front double pole isolation.
If there are no socket circuits, or locations containing baths or showers, then an up front double pole 100mA RCD with single pole MCBs, would comply. Wouldn't want an up front 30mA RCD in a house.
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

It's needed wherever isolation for maintenance or safety is required.
Boiler, cooker, extractor fan, etc.
Single pole RCBOs, are acceptable, as long as there is up front double pole isolation.
If there are no socket circuits, or locations containing baths or showers, then an up front double pole 100mA RCD with single pole MCBs, would comply. Wouldn't want an up front 30mA RCD in a house.

It wouldn't really comply, it would fall foul of the requirements for minimal disruption in the event of a fault on one circuit.
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

It wouldn't really comply, it would fall foul of the requirements for minimal disruption in the event of a fault on one circuit.

You could argue that the disruption has been minimised - you are not inconveniencing any of the neighbouring installations. What happens when the service fuse fails, or the overhead lines get taken out by a falling tree, or the single up-front time delayed 100mA RCD protecting a TT installation trips?

Should we design in emergency lighting, UPS and/or generator backup and all RCBO protection?

As far as I'm aware, there is no black and white regulation that states a single front end RCD is unacceptable, although the "alternative" regulation writers, such as NICEIC / ECA have their own views.

How does the ubiquitous dual RCD board minimise inconvenience anyway? You still lose half your circuits on the rare occasion an RCD trips.

Such an approach may marginally reduce inconvenience, but it certainly doesn't minimise it.
 
Of course a dual RCD unit minimises inconvenience. Half the sockets are still on, half the lights are still on. The boiler could well be still on, as could the cooker and outside lights, burglar alarm, who knows. One single up-front 30mA RCD and a bit of extra earth leakage and EVERYTHING is gone. Daz
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

All of that could be dealt with by means of the main switch.
A main switch is an acceptable method for providing double pole isolation, but it doesn't help if local isolation is required.
For instance, if a gas engineer were to turn up for a boiler safety check, the house holder may prefer for their fridge, freezer, etc. to be left switched on.
Another instance would be an extractor fan in a bathroom.
It may be preferable to remove the cover for cleaning with the lights on?
In reality it's unlikely to be a problem unless there is a fault.
My opinion, is that an up front 30mA RCD will be more likely to suffer nuisance tripping due to cumulative earth leakage from various circuits.
Of course now that 100mA RCBOs are more readily available, the ideal solution is not to use an up front RCD at all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

My opinion, is that an up front 30mA RCD will be more likely to suffer nuisance tripping due to cumulative earth leakage from various circuits.

More likely perhaps, but in a typical domestic installation still pretty unlikely.
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

You could argue that the disruption has been minimised - you are not inconveniencing any of the neighbouring installations. What happens when the service fuse fails, or the overhead lines get taken out by a falling tree, or the single up-front time delayed 100mA RCD protecting a TT installation trips?

Should we design in emergency lighting, UPS and/or generator backup and all RCBO protection?

As far as I'm aware, there is no black and white regulation that states a single front end RCD is unacceptable, although the "alternative" regulation writers, such as NICEIC / ECA have their own views.

How does the ubiquitous dual RCD board minimise inconvenience anyway? You still lose half your circuits on the rare occasion an RCD trips.

Such an approach may marginally reduce inconvenience, but it certainly doesn't minimise it.

So why bother with duel RCD boards?....why not fit a 30ma RCD up front on all installs requiring 30ma RCD protection?
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

As far as I'm aware, there is no black and white regulation that states a single front end RCD is unacceptable, although the "alternative" regulation writers, such as NICEIC / ECA have their own views.

I actually put one in for a customer a few months back, he was a landlord who wanted RCD protection but done as cheaply as possibly as he was selling up. It's not the ideal thing to do, but I left the installation in a safer condition that is found it, and I'd rather I do it safely than somebody else hodges it dangerously.
 
Re: Neurtral isolation for TT supply

I actually put one in for a customer a few months back, he was a landlord who wanted RCD protection but done as cheaply as possibly as he was selling up. It's not the ideal thing to do, but I left the installation in a safer condition that is found it, and I'd rather I do it safely than somebody else hodges it dangerously.

I put one in recently as well for a TT system with no RCD protection! Putting in a 100mA S-type wasn't really an option given that the electric shower; sockets, etc. all would have been left without 30mA protection. As the DB was a discontinued Contactum one (and spares no longer available after contacting the manufacturer) there was really little choice but to mount a frontend 30mA externally (other than replace the DB of course).
 
So I must ask... how are single pole MCB consumer units legal on a TT supply?

Because the circuit breaker is not an isolator in this instance - the main switch is.

Even for domestic TN systems all-pole isolation is required, so there is no reason to make a distinction between them and TT systems.
 
Because the circuit breaker is not an isolator in this instance - the main switch is.

Even for domestic TN systems all-pole isolation is required, so there is no reason to make a distinction between them and TT systems.


Correct, but I dont see people turning the main switch off to work on an individual circuit. How does anyways when out troubleshooting or repairing?
 

Reply to Neutral isolation for TT supply in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Need some advice, I have 7 static caravans to connect which need to be connected via TT 1. All the vans have a 30ma RCD main switch internally...
Replies
6
Views
880
Hello, I'm not an electrician, more one of those 'competent DIYers', so probably the worst kind :) My electric shower broke, the shower firm came...
Replies
13
Views
1K
Good afternoon all, I have been asked to look at a problem with a bolted neutral but no one seems to know what exactly is the problem. SSE...
Replies
0
Views
704
I have a main panel beside my meter on the house built in 1987. Then a 4 wire feed into a 200 amp panel on an inside wall of my basement. All of...
Replies
1
Views
407
I have been asked to provide a quote for a supply to an toilet block on a campsite. The three phase supply to the campsite is approx. 150m from...
Replies
8
Views
488

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock