AFDD in 18th 2nd Amendment

[nicebutdim]

The same could be for an average British semi. Maybe with two lighting circuits - but two are not required. This gives five circuits. Installation costs are then cut right down.

 

[westward10]

I have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?

And it satisfies Regulation 531.3.2(iii). Why don't you tootle off and read it.

 

[UNG]

I have to get you to think and read. Your minds is all over the place.
Back to the point. The design conforms 100% to the 18th and its amendments, offering full AFDD protection to sockets. If you cannot see that why are doing the job you are in?

You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted so you clearly have no access to the regs and anyone who quotes the regs as legal clearly has no understanding of their legal status

As for your profile
Manufacturer Yes you have manufactured some scenario that you think meets the requirements of the regs
Distributor And you have distributed on here as an absolute solution with no other point of view allowed
Supplier You have kept on supplying condescending comments and insults because you and your knowledge has been challenged
Inventor As the invention normally comes before the manfacture I suspect you have them in the wrong order in your profile
etc Who knows what that is

So I would say you are working to your profile

 

[westward10]

@John-SJW you've gone quiet.

 

[John-SJW]

@John-SJW you've gone quiet.

Football on TV. First things first.

 

[westward10]

Football on TV. First things first.

So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.

 

[John-SJW]

You can't even answer the question @westward10 posted

I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.

 

[westward10]

I the design does not conform to the 18th with amendments, then he can tell us where.
So far no has. All I have read is innane circular babble though. Now back to watching the football.

Your design is flawed and is not likely to 100% comply with the 18th Ed as you have stated multiple times.

 

[John-SJW]

531.3.2
(iii) in order to avoid unwanted tripping by protective conductor currents and/or earth leakage currents, the accumulation of such currents downstream
of the RCD shall not be more than 30% of the rated residual operating current.

And?

 

[John-SJW]

So you are stumped then as your circuit design is flawed and you don't know why.

You cannot explain why you think this. A bit of a know-it-all eh!