I’m confused why no one said to change the LO (logic) of the board from A (Automatic) to EP (Semi Automatic Set by step). Means automatic closing time will be turned off and the only way to shut the gates will be by remote or what ever is in the start input, no wiring needed. Also don’t mess around with gates if you don’t know what you doing, as soon as you work on that gate you are responsible for that gate. Stupid I know but that is what I was told by HS bloke on my DHF course.
I'm not at all an electric gate expert.. but I get what you're saying from other firms of automation. The OP was stuck at the principal of latching though so.. not the right person for this particular job.
To pick up on the last thing, about liability, that kinda thing does get said a lot. And to an extent it's true. If a spark replaced a plastic CU with another plastic one, and there was a resulting fire then it would be their problem - even though it was a like for like replacement and they had done nothing to increase risk.
But in more general cases, you can't just send a chap to court and it be a foregone conclusion it was all their fault simply because they were the last person that worked on it. If it can be proved the fault occurred due to something they had not interfered with, or was an inherent design fault, they would quite rightly walk away. Or I'm reality such scrutiny would probably reveal something minor they hadn't got quite right, and they would get a fine.
But as an example.. if I design an electric gate control that relies upon sensors to detect if it's safe to close the gate, but fail to build in failsafe for a damaged/missing sensor, then I would have created a dangerous potential situation. If between me doing that, and someone's car getting hit, you happened to come along and work on it, it wouldn't be very tough in court for an expert to point to the real reason the claim arose. In the end, in almost all cases, it's the person that caused or chose to maintain the danger in the first place. There is just so much fear and caution around H&S these days that instructors make sweeping, simplified statements to both scare you into not taking risks and also to cover themselves.
At the end of the day, I follow my own rule. If I know it's safe, be useful and do the work. But if I don't have sufficient knowledge to be certain that my work won't undermine existing safety measures, I won't do it.