Not really considering we're only talking about a 30m run from the main intake to each rod. For a site this size I'd say it was fine. That's my opinion anyway, it's what I was taught as a lad, it's what I have always done and it's what I will continue to do.

Any links to further info about the subject of muliple earth rod installations and the most effective distance between them would be much appreciated though. I'm not too stubborn to learn why what I'm doing is OTT if indeed it is! :)

I'll see what i can dig up and get back this evening!!


Off out on site now, ...some of us have got to work while you lot are far away in the land of Nod!! lol!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
This basic document on P7 says multiple rods should be installed at a spacing greater than their depth.
View attachment Earth Electrodes And Earth Electrode Testing (1) (2).pdf

This slightly more HV one, in section E5 seems to use a standard spacing of 3.6m for 2.4m rods.
View attachment East Earthing Manual Feb 2002.pdf

This one on pages 40/41 states that rods should be separated by at least their insertion depth
View attachment pub-119-earthing-practice.pdf

However this does not mean I fully understand everything they are saying!!
Just some references.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Grateful for R Burns to post those PDF's above, as i don't have a PDF of the data i typically use. But generally concludes with that of the ''East Earthing Manual'' above, except it goes into a little more detail of when you need to extend distances between connected rod/electrode positions. That will generally be down to soil conditions, eg the better (lower resistivity values) the soil conditions, the greater the distance required, so as not to overlap zones of influence, but i hasten to add, will also generally require less rod positions, if working to attain a specific Ra value.

I'm far more used to installing ground fields (ground nests) and based on soil resistivity and the depth of rods, we will generally space the rods to 1.5X to 2X the depth of rod, and occasionally up to 3X. On a grid system of say 30 rods (wow!! ....just thought about the amount of land needed if working to 10 times the driven depth...lol!!) each will be tested for both active individual Ra value, and for any deterioration in that plateau value caused by adjacent rods, which if present, will clearly show a dip in that plateau. Rarely have i ever seen that plateau dip during final testing. BTW all our rods are copper clad steel 3.2m X 3/4'' supplied by the industry leader in all things on Earthing!! ...lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Cheers RB, I shall have a read through them later :)
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Essex
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)

Thread Information

Title
TT system what set up would you use
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
44

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Welchyboy1,
Last reply from
D Skelton,
Replies
44
Views
3,875

Advert