Search the forum,

Discuss Stupid question? Re. Insulation resistance in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
138
If when carrying out a "whole instalation" test from L+N to Earth the result is say 50 Megohms, and there are ,say,5 circuits would that mean that ALL the circuits pass the test or do each one still need testing?
 
Yes , thats what i said. as there are 5 circuits the each one can be no lower than 50 megs? would each individual circuit still need testing?
Im talking about the real world here ...
 
Last edited:
If you have 50 meg on a global then you don't need to test further. All 5 of those circuits will individually be greater than that figure due to them being parallel resistances when tested together. BS7671 states 1 meg as minimum, not 10.
 
Last edited:
A Global IR test shows up the lowest result for the weakest insulation on a certain circuit. Do an IR test on each circuit and find out which one is low and then find out why?

Global IR testing is fine but when something pops up, it i time to test each circuit.


ps, drop the attitude.
 
Yes , thats what i said. as there are 5 circuits the each one can be no lower than 50 megs? would each individual circuit still need testing?
Im talking about the real world here ...

I'm talking about the real world too, it's just a simple network of five resistances in parallel. It could be five circuits with 250megohm each, or any other combination of resistances which totals 50
 
A Global IR test shows up the lowest result for the weakest insulation on a certain circuit. Do an IR test on each circuit and find out which one is low and then find out why?

Global IR testing is fine but when something pops up, it i time to test each circuit.
Parellel resistances will show lower than and individual cct reading. Also I would be happy with 50 meg on a global
 
A Global IR test shows up the lowest result for the weakest insulation on a certain circuit. Do an IR test on each circuit and find out which one is low and then find out why?

Global IR testing is fine but when something pops up, it i time to test each circuit.


ps, drop the attitude.

Sorry, didnt mean to be offensive... Thanks for the reply...
 
Don't understand that really. It can confirm if an installation has satisfactory insulation resistance overall and if it complies with minimum acceptable values in BS7671. Pretty useful I think.

It tells you if the installation meets an arbitrary value in the book without any regard for the situation.
An installation with 5 circuits could have an IR of 2 megohms and bee deemed satisfactory, and an installation of 50 circuits could have the same IR and be deemed satisfactory. It doesn't take much thinking to realise that the smaller installation is in a poorer condition, but both pass?
And what does it tell you when you look back at previous test results? Absolutely nothing as you cannot see which circuits are deteriorating and which are not.
Once upon a time the minimum value of IR was calculated based on the specifics of an installation, either from the full load current or the number of circuits/points, which makes sense as then it is related to the size of the installation.
But following a blanket 1megohm rule is just daft and symptomatic of the constant simplification of the trade to suit the lowest common denominator instead of striving to achieve a good standard
 
It tells you if the installation meets an arbitrary value in the book without any regard for the situation.
An installation with 5 circuits could have an IR of 2 megohms and bee deemed satisfactory, and an installation of 50 circuits could have the same IR and be deemed satisfactory. It doesn't take much thinking to realise that the smaller installation is in a poorer condition, but both pass?
And what does it tell you when you look back at previous test results? Absolutely nothing as you cannot see which circuits are deteriorating and which are not.
Once upon a time the minimum value of IR was calculated based on the specifics of an installation, either from the full load current or the number of circuits/points, which makes sense as then it is related to the size of the installation.
But following a blanket 1megohm rule is just daft and symptomatic of the constant simplification of the trade to suit the lowest common denominator instead of striving to achieve a good standard
I know the value of individual circuit testing and don't disagree with your points above. BS7671 is the regulations though, so compliance with that is all that is required. Anymore than that is our personal preferences.
 
Last edited:
Personally I'm not happy with a global test

Same here. Deterioration of an individual circuit is much better than just doing and logging a global result. Pin point the offending circuit, rewire/repair or replace the insulation at it's weak point and the job is done. Saves time for the next man if/when certs are availible.

Sorry, didnt mean to be offensive... Thanks for the reply...


Everything is cool Golden_Boy :39::rockon2:
 
I'm talking about the real world too, it's just a simple network of five resistances in parallel. It could be five circuits with 250megohm each, or any other combination of resistances which totals 50

Are you absolutely sure about this Dave ? If each circuit had a I.R. of 250 Megohms I think that's what you'd see on the 'Global' test....
 
Remember that for any set of resistances in parallel the total resistance will be lower than the lowest value of any of the individual resistances.
The worst case scenario is when they are all equal as Davesparks has said.

e.g. if you had five circuits with very high insulation resistance and one circuit with an IR of 2MΩ, then the total resistance when measured as a "whole installation" would be less than 2MΩ.
Say the high values were all 200MΩ then the 1/r for each circuit would be 0.005 (so a total of 0.025 for five circuits) but the 2MΩ 1/r value would be 0.5 therefore the contribution of the "high" values is very small and the total resistance would work out to (1/0.525) or 1.9MΩ.
 
I don't doubt you're all correct but we're talking about insulation resistance or integrity so maintain that if every circuit [4 circuits for example] IR tested say >200 Megohms you'd also see similar as a 'global' reading.
 
I don't doubt you're all correct but we're talking about insulation resistance or integrity so maintain that if every circuit [4 circuits for example] IR tested say >200 Megohms you'd also see similar as a 'global' reading.

Taking your example, if 4 circuits measured individually at >200MOhms it is possible that a global reading would also read the same if the actual readings were very high.
But also possibly not. If all 4 circuits measured 299MOhms then the global reading would be around 75MOhms for example.
 
e.g. if you had five circuits with very high insulation resistance and one circuit with an IR of 2MΩ, then the total resistance when measured as a "whole installation" would be less than 2MΩ.
Does that mean the lowest IR reading the OP would get if he measured the 5 circuits separately would be 50MΩ ?
Sorry confused.com
 
I don't doubt you're all correct but we're talking about insulation resistance or integrity so maintain that if every circuit [4 circuits for example] IR tested say >200 Megohms you'd also see similar as a 'global' reading.

Insulation resistance is the same as any other resistance and follows the scientific laws governing resistance.
Getting a result which displays on a meter as >200megOhm just indicates that the resistance is higher than the maximum reading that instrument is capable of, an instrument with a greater scale would return an actual value for it.
You may very well get a global test result the same as each individual circuit, but that could be that the global result is actually 201megOhm and the individual circuits are all 1005megOhm
 

Reply to Stupid question? Re. Insulation resistance in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello all, I hope you're all keeping well. I have a question regarding insulation resistance testing. Whether doing a single circuit IR test or...
Replies
9
Views
656
Hello everyone, Hope you're all well. I'm carrying out an overall/global insulation resistance test on a newly wired 3 phase installation we did...
Replies
24
Views
1K
No waffling, going to get straight to the point. Main water on the exterior of the building in plastic. Changes to copper inside the building...
Replies
24
Views
978
I have got these questions on 2391-52 inspection and testing but can't remember option of 1st two questions. Please any suggestion will be...
Replies
2
Views
733
I want to check the insulation of the 3-phase 400VAC asynchronous squirrel cage motor. Motor's stator windings are connected in delta. I've read...
Replies
10
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock