But the PAT120 does offer a substitute leakage test, which can't be replicated using an MFT. I wouldn't claim to have completed a PAT without at least some type of leakage test. Maybe I'm old-fashioned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPG and multimick
I thought PAT testers were introduced so that semi-skilled guys could test appliances rather than using an electrician. The testers have a lot of nice extras and can make recording the results easier. But any decent electrician with a insulation and continuity tester plus a note book can test appliances.
 
I thought PAT testers were introduced so that semi-skilled guys could test appliances rather than using an electrician. The testers have a lot of nice extras and can make recording the results easier. But any decent electrician with a insulation and continuity tester plus a note book can test appliances.

Except for leakage tests as mentioned by Lucien.
 
Well, the only tests required on the certificate are continuity of the earth bond / CPC, Continuity of line and neutral (linked) and Insulation Resistance between all conductors. If you must, leakage current can be measured across the appliance insulation using the insulation tester. Touch current measurements are not at all clear in the code of practice and are unusual tests in normal circumstances anyway.
 
My biggest issue would be with the 200mA continuity test. 25A will prove the cpc far more effectively (or nuke it if it's hanging on by a strand or two).
 
I'd been thinking about making an adapter a bit like that - but with an extra socket for an earth continuity lead and a switch. Idea being that the switch would take care of the different connections needed - so the MFT could stay connected, the extra lead connected to exposed conductive parts for Class I continuity & Class II IR test, and only the switch would need to be moved (plus the mode switch on the MFT).
Otherwise, yes an MFT can be used, it's just a bit of a faff having to reconfigure the leads all the time for the different tests.
My biggest issue would be with the 200mA continuity test. 25A will prove the cpc far more effectively (or nuke it if it's hanging on by a strand or two).
How many battery powered PA testers do that ? At my last job (in IT), the boss thought it might be a good idea to get a tester and offer it as a service to customers. My response was that I wasn't going to be the only person "qualified" to do it, and no-one else actually bothered. I borrowed it and used it for my own requirements more than it got used at work (I'd test stuff that came across my desk) ;) Anyway, the spec for it wasn't for much current - only something like 200mA IIRC.
 
How many battery powered PA testers do that ?
I prefer the mains-powered PAT Testers. Mine can be connected to either a 230V or a 110V supply.
 
I'd been thinking about making an adapter a bit like that - but with an extra socket for an earth continuity lead and a switch. Idea being that the switch would take care of the different connections needed - so the MFT could stay connected, the extra lead connected to exposed conductive parts for Class I continuity & Class II IR test, and only the switch would need to be moved (plus the mode switch on the MFT).
Otherwise, yes an MFT can be used, it's just a bit of a faff having to reconfigure the leads all the time for the different tests.

How many battery powered PA testers do that ? At my last job (in IT), the boss thought it might be a good idea to get a tester and offer it as a service to customers. My response was that I wasn't going to be the only person "qualified" to do it, and no-one else actually bothered. I borrowed it and used it for my own requirements more than it got used at work (I'd test stuff that came across my desk) ;) Anyway, the spec for it wasn't for much current - only something like 200mA IIRC.
If 200 mA is good enough for installation continuity testing, why not not for appliances?
 
If 200 mA is good enough for installation continuity testing, why not not for appliances?
The flex in an appliance would typically take more abuse than fixed wiring embedded in the walls or in a conduit/trunking to be fair. It's not really a like comparison. Although traditionally conduit joints would have been tested at these higher currents.
 
I'd been thinking about making an adapter a bit like that - but with an extra socket for an earth continuity lead and a switch. Idea being that the switch would take care of the different connections needed - so the MFT could stay connected, the extra lead connected to exposed conductive parts for Class I continuity & Class II IR test, and only the switch would need to be moved (plus the mode switch on the MFT).
Otherwise, yes an MFT can be used, it's just a bit of a faff having to reconfigure the leads all the time for the different tests.

How many battery powered PA testers do that ? At my last job (in IT), the boss thought it might be a good idea to get a tester and offer it as a service to customers. My response was that I wasn't going to be the only person "qualified" to do it, and no-one else actually bothered. I borrowed it and used it for my own requirements more than it got used at work (I'd test stuff that came across my desk) ;) Anyway, the spec for it wasn't for much current - only something like 200mA IIRC.
You don't need to be qualified to carry out ISITEE.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Simon47
Technically no you don't need any qualifications. But you do need to be competent, and more importantly, you and your employer need some means of showing that.
In practice, the training (provided as part of the package with the tester) was a 20 minute DVD and a multi-choice test paper. But it does mean I have another "magic piece of paper" ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pirate and DPG
I have that magic piece of paper!
Microsoft Publisher, and i can get you one too!
My training actually consisted of a full day, hands- on, plus presentation, plus course manual. It's not exactly rocket science, I know.
The tester I use is a simple Pass/Fail, no bluetooth download, no fancy email reporting, but it can be used battery power or mains.
However, it is only used for landlord testing. Proper electricians like you lot will likely not be impressed!
ISITEE does sound itchy, though...but far preferable to Portable Appliance Testing testing...
but then, why is abbreviation such a long word?
Why doesn't the all-purpose glue stick to the tube?
Why is there only one Monopolies Commission?

Whatever, I just meant that I have no "qualifications", but I am deemed competent, and I actually believe I am competent to do this simple work. However, if anomalies show up, I seek advice, and don't just sticker everything. I do actually test, and do FVI, and as it is an occasional thing for me, I quite enjoy it. If I had to do it every day I would go mad...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Simon47
And that's the thing - being competent. Understanding what the tester is doing and what the results mean.

The problem is when you test something and the tester says Pass, but it hasn't actually tested anything. Figure 8 mains cables come to mind.
 
Why doesn't the all-purpose glue stick to the tube?
:p
A friend once invented a universal solvent. But he couldn't find anything to keep it in :D
 
That's a fair point, DPG!
However, if you have the right adaptors you can test many things...but if you don't know what the tester is doing, you can't be sure...
Recently I tested an office...tons of stuff, but mainly IT.
They had so many extension leads! The Belkin ones failed, time after time...even the non-surge protected ones, but the tester is designed to be that way...I won't bore you with the semantics because you will already know the position...but, oddly, I had never had a fail before on these type of leads. I contacted the tester manufacturer and got an immediate response, which was helpful to me. The client told me to bin them, so I am currently using them at my office-desk! They are absolutely fine!
For me, as an amateur, every day is a learning day. I learn more on here and looking at quality videos than many other so-called learning sources...and there are a couple of guys on here who have given me invaluable assistance on the quiet, so like a new GP, who can't possibly know everything, experience is key.
 
You can get figure 8 adaptors, but since the tester connects live and neutral together, and there is no earth, then what is the tester actually testing?

Rhetorical question by the way!
 
How will you be measuring differential leakage and touch leakage?
Not required. Earth Bond 4V at 100mA min and IR 500V DC at 1mA max. are the only compulsory tests. The rest are more to do with analysis...
 
I see where you are going, DPG!
TBH, I ignore F8 leads in the main...they are either working, or short-circuited, which virtually never happens.
Haven't failed an IEC or kettle lead in ages...except for the ones from the big river that are rated 10A and can barely support 3A...and you can spot them right away just by picking them up and handling them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DPG

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
london
Business Name
Platinum electrical

Thread Information

Title
PAT Tester broken but i can use megger?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
48

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
chris day,
Last reply from
static zap,
Replies
48
Views
12,113

Advert