Discuss Main Protective Bonding in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

Reaction score
5
Evening all,

Recently started working for a company carrying out electrical installations - I've found a job today that didn't have any bonding to the incoming water or gas supplies and both were in metal so do require bonding.

Spoke with my boss to explain and said that I was popping out to get 10mm2 Green/Yellow, clamps etc and he said not to carry on with anymore works and leave the job; I explained that the actual works to carry out the bonding was easy, would take around 15-20mins to complete, need around 10M of cable and 2x clamps so wouldn't cost a lot and then I can complete the install but his response was that he wasn't worried about the extra cost of actually putting the bonding in it was that we'd need to then carry out an EICR on the whole installation as we'd changed the earthing parameters of the system????

Really odd and something I'd not heard of before? Is this right? Surely it's just a matter of installing the new bonding, testing to make sure its connection and continuity is verified and is below the set parameters for resistance and then I'd carry out my continuity of CPC, Ze, Zs, PFC, PSCC and RCD tests when completing my install as I would do on all occasions no matter what anyway?

Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Pete.
 
I'd have done what you were going to do!
I'm not sure why your boss thought that - so it's guesswork... two very wacky ideas are:
1 - he thought that by suddenly bonding the services you might be creating some extraneous conductive parts and the whole place would need a good look over to check this. I can't see this actually happening myself.
2 - He was concerned that a faulty appliance e.g. water heater, boiler would start tripping something once the services were bonded. Again, unlikely.

So I'm a little baffled too.
 
Your boss is a cowboy.

Regulation 132.16 clearly states the earthing and bonding arrangements shall be adequate before carrying out additions and alterations to an installation.
 
it was that we'd need to then carry out an EICR on the whole installation as we'd changed the earthing parameters of the system????
Well it might change the DB Zs value due to parallel paths, but only in the better direction.

What is important is supply earth is the Ze value, that is not changed by the additional bonding. The reason it is important is exactly this point, that if bonding is to metal service pipes that get changed to plastic then you lose the parallel paths and if Ze is not low enough to begin with you have big problems for ADS!

To me the lack of main bonding is a serious risk if it is a TN-C-S supply as under open PEN fault conditions the resulting neutral current will try to find its way home. If that is via a 0.75mm CPC to the boiler in the house a fire could start!
 
The boss was right to say stop work and leave the job, as we're not allowed to make any additions or alterations unless earthing and bonding is satisfactory. And it's between him and the client as to whether to go ahead with unplanned additional works without discussing the additional cost before work commences.

I suspect he will convince the client that an EICR needs to be done in view of the lack of bonding, as there may well be other issues to be dealt with before going ahead with the planned works.

In other words he has made a financial decision based on your findings.
 
The boss was right to say stop work and leave the job, as we're not allowed to make any additions or alterations unless earthing and bonding is satisfactory. And it's between him and the client as to whether to go ahead with unplanned additional works without discussing the additional cost before work commences.

I suspect he will convince the client that an EICR needs to be done in view of the lack of bonding, as there may well be other issues to be dealt with before going ahead with the planned works.

In other words he has made a financial decision based on your findings.
That is a very good point, it may be nothing to do with the electrical desirability of the bonds.
 
Its not clear what you were there to do, but you do make a statement about carrying on with the install, so your boss should have looked/surveyed the job and would have spotted the gas and water not bonded before the said works started.
 
After remedial’s either new satisfactory EICR or MWC indicating MPEC been completed & realating to EICR for a satisfactory installation
 

Reply to Main Protective Bonding in the Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock