It is a risk assessment with the client and based on your engineering judgment about the justification of installing such as device
It is still not a recommendation why can you not see that?
[automerge]1585813064[/automerge]

Did he write the regulations on SPD’s?
You obviously have no idea who this man is
 
Have done and watched the vid
[automerge]1585813289[/automerge]

Well I would say that he knows a lot more than you do
He may do, he may not that’s irrelevant
Obviously your back is up about this so I’ll leave it there.
 
He may do, he may not that’s irrelevant
Obviously your back is up about this so I’ll leave it there.
443.4 overvoltage protection read it bottom section......as I said apology accepted
 
443.4 overvoltage protection read it bottom section......as I said apology accepted
Yep does not mention recommendation to a dwelling anywhere
For all other case a RA shall be performed etc etc except for single dwelling units, where the cost of the installation and equipment therin does not justify such protection. So what if it does justify such protection?

Apologies the thread is way off track.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If its tns you should enquire with dno to determine if its likely to be upgraded to pme anytime soon.
With pme you need to look at where the charger is being used... For example in a garage linked to house use the supplied PME..
The latest generation of chargers can be safely installed on pme systems without a rod.. Zappi, ANDERSEN, pod Point solo etc... There are options if installing a rod is not practical such as upfront devices.
This is where some people come unstuck as whilst the charger will likely be okay and not be dangerous. All it takes is there to be a fault and a broken Pen conductor and they are up the proverbial creek if somebody gets hurt. Broken Pen conductors are more common than we realise having spoken to a DNO area manager at a recent open forum event in January.
Every EV install is unique, they take some planning to do properly and the risk assessment as per iet best practice guide should always be done.
 
Yep does not mention recommendation to a dwelling anywhere
Yep does not mention recommendation to a dwelling anywhere
Yep does not mention recommendation to a dwelling anywhere
Screenshot_20200402-084755_YouTube.jpg

Yep does not mention recommendation to a dwelling anywhere
For all other case a RA shall be performed etc etc except for single dwelling units, where the cost of the installation and equipment therin does not justify such protection. So what if it does justify such protection?

Apologies the thread is way off track.
Then you recommend one......ta da
 
No you install one , you don’t recommend!
Not if the client says that they don't want one.....it's only a recommendation
 
If the Consequences caused by overvoltage for a single dwelling unit where an assessment shows the total value of electrical installation and connected equipment is found to necessitate the cost of SPD protection then you install one, you don’t fob it off as the assessment will have been done with the client.
If it’s found it’s not required then yes don’t install one.
 
View attachment 56887

Then you recommend one......ta da

It does not say that.
It says that where a risk assessment is not performed an SPD must be installed. With one exception, a single dwelling where the cost of installation outweighs the benefit.

So:
1: If a risk assessment is carried out then you follow whatever the conclusion of the risk assessment is. This does not constitute a recommendation, this is a clear yes or no decision based on calculated risk.
2:if a risk assessment is not carried out you fit an SPD (no mention of recommendation)

The exception to 2 is that IF it is a single

dwelling AND the total value of the equipment that would be protected does not justify the cost of installation then SPD protection may be omitted.
Again a clear yes/no decision based on calculation. This is not a recommendation.

Nothing in the regulations mentions recommendations for SPDs, the requirements are clear-cut yes/no decisions.
[automerge]1585819738[/automerge]
Not if the client says that they don't want one.....it's only a recommendation

If the client says they don't want one, then don't do the job and walk away.
As far as the regulations are concerned you do the job to the regulations or not at all, theres no picking and choosing which bits you want to comply with.
 
i dont agree with that? Your suppost to eliminate the car shell becoming live should a open PEN conductor occur not wait for someone to have a shock and hope the rcd trips which it wouldnt with the loss of neutral conductor!

Why do we have RCD at all then?

RCD are fitted so there is no single point of failure that leads to a dangerous situation. They are not a substitute for proper insulation of conductors or earth bonding of metalwork, but are there to deal with cases when something unlikely but possible results in a dangerous situation (e.g. open PEN conductor, garden tool cuts extension lead, etc).

True if you lost the majority of L-N voltage it would not be able to trip but I suspect you would see a fair portion of 230V remaining due to the other phases' loads. If designing something like this from scratch you would probably have something like the Matt:e box contactor that would zero-volt release under such circumstances, and possibly only close fafter doing a self-test cycle.
 
Had a call out yesterday to a Car Charger not working Power supply on to unit.
When car plugged in went to fault straight away.
On investigation found the earth rod on the house supply had a sheared nut in the earth pit leaving a very high earth loop.

If the car Charger had not picked up this issue the people in the house would of never known the nut was sheared.

Just my Thoughts
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3781.JPG
    IMG_3781.JPG
    261.9 KB · Views: 32
If the Consequences caused by overvoltage for a single dwelling unit where an assessment shows the total value of electrical installation and connected equipment is found to necessitate the cost of SPD protection then you install one, you don’t fob it off as the assessment will have been done with the client.
If it’s found it’s not required then yes don’t install one.

Given that separate Type 2 SP+N SPD can be bought for under £100 and you can get whole CU with them already included for around £100-£150, why both with the risk assessment at all?

I suspect doing it properly and documenting it for the client is going to cost more than £100 of your time!
 
Given that separate Type 2 SP+N SPD can be bought for under £100 and you can get whole CU with them already included for around £100-£150, why both with the risk assessment at all?

I suspect doing it properly and documenting it for the client is going to cost more than £100 of your time!
I install them as standard in domestic
 
No spd required.......it's only a recommendation to have one and I believe you have to do a course to get a qualification to fit car chargers

i believe you only have to have the qualification and manufacturer ev charger approved if you want to be olev registered. If not a EIC will suffice.
[automerge]1585859854[/automerge]
Why do we have RCD at all then?

RCD are fitted so there is no single point of failure that leads to a dangerous situation. They are not a substitute for proper insulation of conductors or earth bonding of metalwork, but are there to deal with cases when something unlikely but possible results in a dangerous situation (e.g. open PEN conductor, garden tool cuts extension lead, etc).

True if you lost the majority of L-N voltage it would not be able to trip but I suspect you would see a fair portion of 230V remaining due to the other phases' loads. If designing something like this from scratch you would probably have something like the Matt:e box contactor that would zero-volt release under such circumstances, and possibly only close fafter doing a self-test cycle.

no this is does not mean fitting an rcd will cover the open PEN fault. You contradicting yourself in your post, yes a contactor will satisfy this requirement hencr the 1st amendment.
have you fitted an ev charger on a pme relying on this two rcds in series theory??
 
Earth rod bolt shearing is very common when they are overtightened. I've done it myself a few times when I was learning but soon learned that brass bolts don't need anywhere near the same torque as steel
 
I try not to use the bolt, but pack the clamp with brass wedges and just nip up the bolt at the end, using 25mm bare copper conductor there is not a lot of space to pack.
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Joined
Location
Warminster
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Electrical Engineer (Qualified)
Business Name
Norbeck

Thread Information

Title
EV Charger Earth Rod
Prefix
UK 
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
61

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Ben Murray,
Last reply from
Mike Johnson,
Replies
61
Views
10,499

Advert