Discuss Fault on lighting cct prevents taking Zs in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
39
Hi All

Taking a Zs from a light switch and am reading 160 volts between L & E.
What would you code this. I think it could be a neutral fault but I don't have the time available to investigate. The location is a hotel room.
 
The OP should be aware of this if carrying out an EICR.

You will have to have a bit of patience with me as up to a year ago the only experience I had of a ring circuit was at 11000v,the last phase rotation test was on a 11000v , 7.4 MW ,slip ring motor and my last-phasing out was paralleling two 5MVA 1100/550V Dyn 11 transformers. The signing off package ran to volumes.

Having said all that I am also autherized to switch 33000V systems.

The OP was aware
 
You will have to have a bit of patience with me as up to a year ago the only experience I had of a ring circuit was at 11000v,the last phase rotation test was on a 11000v , 7.4 MW ,slip ring motor and my last-phasing out was paralleling two 5MVA 1100/550V Dyn 11 transformers. The signing off package ran to volumes.

Having said all that I am also autherized to switch 33000V systems.

The OP was aware
Don’t you go round wiring up 11kV rings anywhere near me not something I want to come across on a domestic/commercial EICR :p most of the time someone on here will assume the worst we are all guilty of it with the limited info most OPs give and the amount of chancers we get on here doing their own work and nuggets that don’t know their earth from their a**e :eek:

Edit: I’ve never heard that saying before so I’m copyrighting it and making it a trademark don’t steal it ;)
 
Other test results?

R1+R2?

IR testing?

And out of curiosity why Zs from a switch position and not furthest point of the circuit?
 
You will have to have a bit of patience with me as up to a year ago the only experience I had of a ring circuit was at 11000v,the last phase rotation test was on a 11000v , 7.4 MW ,slip ring motor and my last-phasing out was paralleling two 5MVA 1100/550V Dyn 11 transformers. The signing off package ran to volumes.

Having said all that I am also autherized to switch 33000V systems.

The OP was aware

That's lovely, but as far as I know completly irrelevant to your original question and any testing carried out to bs7671.
This suggests you have less than a years experience of working on installations at lv and to bs7671, so approximately the same experience as a first/second year apprentice.
 
Hi All

Taking a Zs from a light switch and am reading 160 volts between L & E.
What would you code this. I think it could be a neutral fault but I don't have the time available to investigate. The location is a hotel room.


Not being funny, but you tested L - E, got 160v, and you think it could be a neutral fault??? How?? You were not testing for a PD across L&N? Unless of course, a PEN conductor was down, but then I would hope you would have noticed other interesting things too lol. Obvs, that last bit was a joke!

As Murdoch has already suggested, you clearly have a floating cpc/earth.
 
That's lovely, but as far as I know completly irrelevant to your original question and any testing carried out to bs7671.
This suggests you have less than a years experience of working on installations at lv and to bs7671, so approximately the same experience as a first/second year apprentice.
You obviously don't get the joke, lighten up a bit
 
You obviously don't get the joke, lighten up a bit

Do enlighten us, what is the joke?
You are carrying out an eicr, what is the joke?
Electrical safety at any voltage is far from a joke, if you have a clue you will realise electricity can, and will, kill without any regard for your opinion of whether it is funny or not.

Personally I don't care, but I'm lead to believe that the death of humans is unacceptable?

However I am curious as to how a liver and bacon casserole would taste with hunan liver? I've made it with all of the commonly available livers but humans are somewhat harder to come by for some reason? Perhaps once a few people have died from your approach to electrical safety you could cut out their livers and send them to me, I'll be happy to invite you to dinner to try this particular delicacy.
 
That's lovely, but as far as I know completly irrelevant to your original question and any testing carried out to bs7671.
This suggests you have less than a years experience of working on installations at lv and to bs7671, so approximately the same experience as a first/second year apprentice.

I agree with your 1 year experience wrt the UK. I think you should take into consideration my 40 years experience on projects in the mining industry in southern and East Africa, working to the mining regs
I served my apprenticeship(5 years)in the UK. The bit about 11kV etc was me having a hissy fit. (Western10) thought it funny.Sorted out the fault today. I was looking for coding. In South Africa the mines set their own more stringent regs i.e lack of labelling is a C1. So I just wanted to know what the forum thought
Do enlighten us, what is the joke?
You are carrying out an eicr, what is the joke?
Electrical safety at any voltage is far from a joke, if you have a clue you will realise electricity can, and will, kill without any regard for your opinion of whether it is funny or not.

Personally I don't care, but I'm lead to believe that the death of humans is unacceptable?

However I am curious as to how a liver and bacon casserole would taste with hunan liver? I've made it with all of the commonly available livers but humans are somewhat harder to come by for some reason? Perhaps once a few people have died from your approach to electrical safety you could cut out their livers and send them to me, I'll be happy to invite you to dinner to try this particular delicacy.
 
However I am curious as to how a liver and bacon casserole would taste with hunan liver? I've made it with all of the commonly available livers but humans are somewhat harder to come by for some reason? Perhaps once a few people have died from your approach to electrical safety you could cut out their livers and send them to me, I'll be happy to invite you to dinner to try this particular delicacy.

I think admin need to change your screen name to Hannibal Lector lol
 
I agree with your 1 year experience wrt the UK. I think you should take into consideration my 40 years experience on projects in the mining industry in southern and East Africa, working to the mining regs
I served my apprenticeship(5 years)in the UK. The bit about 11kV etc was me having a hissy fit. (Western10) thought it funny.Sorted out the fault today. I was looking for coding. In South Africa the mines set their own more stringent regs i.e lack of labelling is a C1. So I just wanted to know what the forum thought

Ok. Out if inteest, Where did you find the broken / disconnected cpc then?
 
Do enlighten us, what is the joke?
You are carrying out an eicr, what is the joke?
Electrical safety at any voltage is far from a joke, if you have a clue you will realise electricity can, and will, kill without any regard for your opinion of whether it is funny or not.

Personally I don't care, but I'm lead to believe that the death of humans is unacceptable?

However I am curious as to how a liver and bacon casserole would taste with hunan liver? I've made it with all of the commonly available livers but humans are somewhat harder to come by for some reason? Perhaps once a few people have died from your approach to electrical safety you could cut out their livers and send them to me, I'll be happy to invite you to dinner to try this particular delicacy.
I take safety very seriously the nature of my previous work dictates that. The joke was me having a hissy fit wrt 11kV not the fault.
I 'm sorry I brought out the Hanibal Lector in you(that is a joke)
 
I agree with your 1 year experience wrt the UK. I think you should take into consideration my 40 years experience on projects in the mining industry in southern and East Africa, working to the mining regs
I served my apprenticeship(5 years)in the UK. The bit about 11kV etc was me having a hissy fit. (Western10) thought it funny.Sorted out the fault today. I was looking for coding. In South Africa the mines set their own more stringent regs i.e lack of labelling is a C1. So I just wanted to know what the forum thought
Dont get mixed up with mines regs ,they are completely different from BS7671.
Forget about them and get up to speed with 18th Edition
 
I will probably be caned by some for this. At the time I discovered the fault I was under the cosh so I wasn't able to find the reason. Today I had a bit more time and luckily the fault was easily rectified. Ironically later on I found a definate Code 1. Which I also rectified on the spot as it was easy. The condition of the installation on the whole is good with the biggest problem being the CUs weren't accurately marked up( circuit description not matching to what was actually installed)
 
I will probably be caned by some for this. At the time I discovered the fault I was under the cosh so I wasn't able to find the reason. Today I had a bit more time and luckily the fault was easily rectified. Ironically later on I found a definate Code 1. Which I also rectified on the spot as it was easy. The condition of the installation on the whole is good with the biggest problem being the CUs weren't accurately marked up( circuit description not matching to what was actually installed)
I find it better to start at the intake and work from there.
 
Perhaps the switch is the furthest point!
Can't see why someone gave a disagree, it is conceivable that the switch IS the furthest point of a lighting circuit, unless of course all the switches are installed under the Consumers Unit !!!!:tongue:;):p:)
 
Dont get mixed up with mines regs ,they are completely different from BS7671.
Forget about them and get up to speed with 18th Edition

Just an update, on another forum an inspector found the DBs circuit labelling so bad he gave it a C1, most people give it a C3 from what I gather on this forum. Who is right? Maybe both?

This was on a commercial installation.
 
Just an update, on another forum an inspector found the DBs circuit labelling so bad he gave it a C1, most people give it a C3 from what I gather on this forum. Who is right? Maybe both
The use of C1 means it must have been an immediate danger, perhaps where machines and isolators are mislabelled which could end in disaster. At home having lights up being lights down is not so much of a concern (must fix that :) ).
 
The use of C1 means it must have been an immediate danger, perhaps where machines and isolators are mislabelled which could end in disaster. At home having lights up being lights down is not so much of a concern (must fix that :) ).
I Agree with you Wilko, circumstances dictate. No hard and fast rules.
 
I can understand the light switch being furthest point from the CU if the light point was also the furthest light point from the cu but there would only normally be a live and switched live return at the switch, No neutral in order to take a Zs reading!
And if so, the furthest point and highest reading would be between the switched return and the neutral AT the light fitting, not the switch.
 
I can understand the light switch being furthest point from the CU if the light point was also the furthest light point from the cu but there would only normally be a live and switched live return at the switch, No neutral in order to take a Zs reading!
And if so, the furthest point and highest reading would be between the switched return and the neutral AT the light fitting, not the switch.
Zs on a neutral?
 
Then join E & N together , Metrel testers have a double end on one of the probes to do this. Apart from this the OSG shows how to take Zs from a light sw.
 
Yeah have done that before and you would expect readings to be the same but they weren't.
Does seem more accurate with the N connected, but maybe that's just the meter I was using at the time, when compared with a mates MTF 1552 which had been recently calibrated.
 
Yeah have done that before and you would expect readings to be the same but they weren't.
Does seem more accurate with the N connected, but maybe that's just the meter I was using at the time, when compared with a mates MTF 1552 which had been recently calibrated.
In these days of multifunction testers the idea of getting 2 identical test results from 2 seperate tests are long gone. That's the big disadvantage with MFT's
 

Reply to Fault on lighting cct prevents taking Zs in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

I need your help please once again in tracing a fault. Am DIY but not clueless. Converting former kitchen into 2 rooms: bathroom and laundry. The...
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Question
Hi there, I’m a new member to the forum and felt like I could do with some additional insight into a fault I came across on a call-out at the...
Replies
6
Views
518
Hi folks I've just identified as cause of lighting circuit tripping in consumer unit a low volts ceiling light with laride transformer taking in...
Replies
7
Views
291
Hi guys. Having a weird problem in a house that has suddenly happened. One half of the ring main has 240ish volts (fluctuates of course), and...
Replies
9
Views
513
Hi, I am currently reading through the standard IEC 61439-1 - Low-voltage swtichgear and controlgear assemblies - Part 1: General rules, and on...
Replies
0
Views
108

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock