Dartlec

Arms
Jun 29, 2020
1,752
2,506
3,688
Kent
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)
Business Name
Dartlec
I do seem to pick only the weirdest properties to inspect...

Victorian terraced house today - with up front RCD to a Wylex fuse board and main bonding all in place to current standards....

No cpc on lighting, but all pendants and plastic switches - so far so fairly standard.

Then remove the CU cover and find this:

Southend2.jpg

I'm guessing somewhere originally early 60s given the lack of cpc and tinned stranded connectors?

With 2 main issues:

1. Kitchen feed run from CU (30A 3036) in 6mm T&E (probably to an old cooker feed) - and then kitchen sockets run post 2005 in 2.5mm twin and earth.

At first I thought it was a lollipop arrangement, but not even that when testing at the sockets (No ring in sight)

Even so, that can be sorted for now with a drop to a 20A plug in MCB - not ideal for a kitchen with oven, but it's only doing 2 double sockets and a dishwasher in addition....

2. The rest of the sockets (only 1 in most rooms, with 2 in master bedroom) though are run in what I guess would be called "Twin" from another 30A 3036 - 2.5mm (imperial equivalent) with no earth. Perfect continuity of live conductors and when checking at the (very few) sockets - each one has a separate earth run to it, in bare twisted tinned copper imperial somewhere between 2.5mm and 4mm from eye.

Zs is fine at each socket, but the earths do not appear to run from the CU, so not possible to do R1&R2 at each socket. R1&RN fine at each socket though.

A RFC would have 2 x 1.5mm CPCs at each point - this has something akin to that at each point in a single conductor, with unknown source, but zs tests suggest adequate to deal with the short fault currents liable to occur before the RCD cuts in.

So do this count as a C2 for not having cpc continuity on a RFC - or is not technically a RFC but a hybrid that is non-ideal but safe? or in need of downrating to a radial to be safe for continued use? Or a C2 regardless of the OPCD?

How would you code that little lot?

Clearly the place needs rewiring sooner rather than later, but in terms of an EICR it ticks most of the boxes that older properties usually fail on...

RCBO board would fit nicely in the cupboard, replacing the up front RCD with an isolator switch, but not entirely happy reconnecting wiring with no CPC to a 'new' install - and I don't really want to do the rewiring job (it's not that local).
 
  • Like
Reactions: timhoward
Baffling! someone has gone to the trouble of replacing the meter tails though - Brown and Blue (Not 60's)!

Probably C3 as there is evidence of some sort of earth connection as you've managed to get a Zs reading at the socket outlets, otherwise C2
 
Baffling! someone has gone to the trouble of replacing the meter tails though - Brown and Blue (Not 60's)!

Probably C3 as there is evidence of some sort of earth connection as you've managed to get a Zs reading at the socket outlets, otherwise C2
Was there ever a period when 2.5mm equivalent 'twin' pvc without earth would have been used in domestic? I'd have thought by the time PVC came in (post 50s VIR?) that earths on sockets were very much a requirement already?

No idea where the earths run to/from though, it certainly wasn't visible in the meter cupboard, which had an RCD installed and meter tails upgraded, along with main earth and bonding, at some point...

Seems to have been done properly too (though no date visible on the installation sticker). Meter was changed 2015ish it seems.

Fuse Cupboard.jpg
 
I have seen many two core lighting circuits with a separate bare tinned cpc strung around them but not power circuits. It is normally evident at the consumer unit but yours is not so you have to question where it is connected, a water pipe maybe? I personally think it warrants an FI.
 
I have seen many two core lighting circuits with a separate bare tinned cpc strung around them but not power circuits. It is normally evident at the consumer unit but yours is not so you have to question where it is connected, a water pipe maybe? I personally think it warrants an FI.
FI makes sense - except I'm not sure how one would get the information - the downstairs is fully hardwood/laminate floors, so no floorboards to easily take up. The sockets are surface pattresses attached to skirting boards, clearly where original single sockets would have been so it would appear it may have originally been installed like it.
 
Can you physically see it is a two core cable at the consumer unit.
 
Can you physically see it is a two core cable at the consumer unit.
yes - it's 100% 2.5mm (imp equivalent) twin with no earth, not cut back short or anything.

Not a great picture - but this is at one of the sockets...

socket.jpg

The cpc runs in separately through the skirting board as bare tinned - then sleeved (but only one feed at the sockets I checked, not looped in/out).

R1+RN was exactly as expected and in line with R1 and RN of 0.19... Zs tested as 0.87 maximum (on an extension lead run from behind a bed with someone in it so couldn't investigate fully....), but more like 0.38 ish on the ring - Ze was 0.15, so it all makes some sort of 'sense'.

IR on that circuit (L&N -> MET) was 30+ MOhms, though not sure exactly what that proves.... I wasn't able to completely isolate everything.

I didn't do a resistance test from MET to each earth with the wander lead, which looking back now might have been useful, but like you I expected to see the CPCs back to the CU.

The sort of job that needs multiple people ripping it apart for days to get full information I guess, but domestic EICRs don't usually allow for that sort of effort...
 
It is possible to prove a connection to an extraneous part and probably not that difficult with so few points. Isolate power, remove the earthing conductor and all cpcs at the consumer unit but leave the main protective bonding in place. If they have a boiler or immersion ditch the cpcs at the isolators then do a continuity check to the bonding.
 
yes - it's 100% 2.5mm (imp equivalent) twin with no earth, not cut back short or anything.

Not a great picture - but this is at one of the sockets...

View attachment 84896

The cpc runs in separately through the skirting board as bare tinned - then sleeved (but only one feed at the sockets I checked, not looped in/out).

R1+RN was exactly as expected and in line with R1 and RN of 0.19... Zs tested as 0.87 maximum (on an extension lead run from behind a bed with someone in it so couldn't investigate fully....), but more like 0.38 ish on the ring - Ze was 0.15, so it all makes some sort of 'sense'.

IR on that circuit (L&N -> MET) was 30+ MOhms, though not sure exactly what that proves.... I wasn't able to completely isolate everything.

I didn't do a resistance test from MET to each earth with the wander lead, which looking back now might have been useful, but like you I expected to see the CPCs back to the CU.

The sort of job that needs multiple people ripping it apart for days to get full information I guess, but domestic EICRs don't usually allow for that sort of effort...
These are the EICRS I hate, you can argue that it is compliant based on test results but in my mind it’s not and needs upgrading is there any RCD protection in here? It’s well outdated and I would recommend the consideration of rewiring the property it’s well overdue isnt it. Many will argue that it’s not needed right now but when will you change that thought process? When it’s too late?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: telectrix
These are the EICRS I hate, you can argue that it is compliant based on test results but in my mind it’s not and needs upgrading is there any RCD protection in here? It’s well outdated and I would recommend the consideration of rewiring the property it’s well overdue isnt it. Many will argue that it’s not needed right now but when will you change that thought process? When it’s too late?
These are the sort of EICRs you need they build your knowledge and experience.
 
These are the EICRS I hate, you can argue that it is compliant based on test results but in my mind it’s not and needs upgrading is there any RCD protection in here? It’s well outdated and I would recommend the consideration of rewiring the property it’s well overdue isnt it. Many will argue that it’s not needed right now but when will you change that thought process? When it’s too late?
I know I'm mad but I like this sort of a challenge! (there is up front RCD btw)
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicebutdim
These are the sort of EICRs you need they build your knowledge and experience.
Yes true but you need to have your books to hand don’t you. Or even better post on here and guys like yourself help out. (I HOPE) i will be going through that process in the next year or so when Wales puts it in legislation to have an up to date EICR like our compatriots in England and Scotland.
 
I know I'm mad but I like this sort of a challenge! (there is up front RCD btw)
Right ok I missed that. RCD does help out in many situations
 
These are the sort of EICRs you need they build your knowledge and experience.
I'd rather it wasn't the ones that were an hours drive away though!
 
  • Like
Reactions: timhoward
I knew I'd read of this before once.
EDIT doesn't seem to let me link to an IET forum article....
Some interesting comments about the span between metal conduit and the earliest PVC, apparently the cpc's were sometimes connected to the conduit using a threaded earth coupling.
1957 is suggested.
I'll beat the system....!
1618955833258.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dartlec
I knew I'd read of this before once.
Some interesting comments about the span between metal conduit and the earliest PVC, apparently the cpc's were sometimes connected to the conduit using a threaded earth coupling.
1957 is suggested.
That links not working for me for some reason - what's the thread title?

Sounds about right - I guess it's better than it being VIR... And too early for green goo too...
 
That links not working for me for some reason - what's the thread title?

Sounds about right - I guess it's better than it being VIR... And too early for green goo too...
It doesn't let me link to IET forum:
1618955908960.png
1618955926451.png
 
That links not working for me for some reason - what's the thread title?

Sounds about right - I guess it's better than it being VIR... And too early for green goo too...
Yea I can’t open the link but I understand what you’re trying to display by the wording. I’ve come across a few older installs which were wired in singles and earthed through the conduits. Was great when I was rewiring them. Tied on and pulled through new pvc twin and earth and got paid per property these properties with conduits earned me mega £££ and the boys I worked with enjoyed the ? when we finished early ???
 
  • Like
Reactions: timhoward
It doesn't let me link to IET forum:
View attachment 84908
View attachment 84909
Ah yes, I'd forgotten that certain other forums are blocked, however sneakily you try to list them....

The house is older than that, but may well have been rewired from the original conduit installation - though no surface signs left of conduit - it might be hidden behind the skirting board I guess....

But that begs the question as to where the conduit is earthed - the Zs is too low for it to be acting as a rod, and possibly even too low for it to be directly using any pipes - but the main bonding may be increasing that.

The water main bonding wasn't visually available, just to add to the fun, though verified by testing...
 
  • Like
Reactions: timhoward
If it is late 50s wiring then it goes to show how good comparatively PVC is since there was very little sign of 'aging'

What did the 13th say about RFC cpcs I wonder?

If this is run from a 'genuine' source, rather than via extraneous bonding, then can a single suitable sized earth at each point be considered safe for fault protection on an RFC? and if so what is that size?

Dropping it to a 20A radial would not be a major problem to be honest - it's 7 sockets in total - and the whole property is on a 60A fuse in any case...
 
If this is run from a 'genuine' source, rather than via extraneous bonding, then can a single suitable sized earth at each point be considered safe for fault protection on an RFC? and if so what is that size?
Taking your max Zs of 0.38, so fault current of 605 amps, I think I'm ending up with 3mm csa using adiabatic. I believe you said somewhere between 2.5 and 4mm.
I'm also reflecting there should be a way to tell the equation you've had 3 cans of 1664 though, so you'd better check my maths....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dartlec and loz2754
Taking your max Zs of 0.38, so fault current of 605 amps, I think I'm ending up with 3mm csa using adiabatic. I believe you said somewhere between 2.5 and 4mm.
I'm also reflecting there should be a way to tell the equation you've had 3 cans of 1664 though, so you'd better check my maths....
like your style. 1664 is 1 of the few available lagers that are drinkable.
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Dartlec

Arms
Joined
Location
Kent
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)
Business Name
Dartlec

Thread Information

Title
Puzzling installation
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
24

Thread Tags

Tags Tags
installation

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
Dartlec,
Last reply from
telectrix,
Replies
24
Views
3,555

Advert