Discuss AFDDs are a massive fraud in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

From an on the ground engineering point of view how exactly do you fault find the cause of an AFDD tripping especially if it is a nuisance trip with no test equipment available to verify the operation of the unit, does an AFDD's ability to detect a fault degrade over time or if it detects a fault does that reduce it's future efficacy or do you just replace it, there seems to be so many unknowns and unanswered issues with this new piece of kit you have to wonder why the IET have jumped in feet first on this one

AFDD nuisance trip inquiries are a daily affair @ NEC chatrooms

All manner of conjecture are usually entertained.

There are 'testers' marketed by the same manufacturers of them , but simply looking for something parallel Vs series usually reveals the problem

That our system incorporates a neutral makes this all the more tedious

&&&&>>

Our AFDD's state right in the manufactured instructions to remove them prior to any megging

Which over time mother nature may introduce.

So what we installed 20 yrs ago may 'test' as far as the unit's test button , but there is (as yet) no lockout feature UL mandated for our GFCI's , over 50% (their studies) confirmed

~S~
 
Sorry, mother nature may introduce what?

Some of your posts are confusing.
 
The land of the free and the brave, no more then?


We all know America is smoke and mirrors.

People who believe peace can be kept through violence, the constitution protected by violating it and the oath sworn to uphold it, people freed by being enslaved, helping others by pushing them back down, depriving information is the key to education, ect.


Yet somehow AFCIs should not be view with skepticism. :rolleyes:
 
(If its OK to ask from your practical experiences,
have you spotted any of the following )
Returning to false alarms .
a) Are any brands better than others .
Do location factors provide any clues
b) Are cities / situations more prone ie near TV
Taxi , radio ham ,airport radar ?
c) Problems near car workshops / industrial welding.
Does the age of the install influence things?
d) Sturdy but worn older sockets
e) New flimsy parts of certain brands
 
The land of the free and the brave, no more then?
Sold_Glory_The_Corporate_States_of_America.jpg

~S~
 
(If its OK to ask from your practical experiences,
have you spotted any of the following )
Returning to false alarms .
[quote/]
a) Are any brands better than others .
Do location factors provide any clues
GE (good enough!)





b) Are cities / situations more prone ie near TV
Taxi , radio ham ,airport radar ?

I wouldn't know, i live way out


) Problems near car workshops / industrial welding.
Does the age of the install influence things?


d) Sturdy but worn older sockets


e) New flimsy parts of certain brands

I really should post some of our wiring to answer this for you, but yes, yes & yes

~S~
 
Thanks for your last three posts Sisyphus, they were most informative. I'm sure we all learned a lot from the technical detail. They go well with the ropey YouTube videos posted by your friend previously.
 
From an on the ground engineering point of view how exactly do you fault find the cause of an AFDD tripping especially if it is a nuisance trip with no test equipment available to verify the operation of the unit, does an AFDD's ability to detect a fault degrade over time or if it detects a fault does that reduce it's future efficacy or do you just replace it, there seems to be so many unknowns and unanswered issues with this new piece of kit you have to wonder why the IET have jumped in feet first on this one


When working in the security industry, Racal had a pir that a device could be plugged onto its test pins showing +/- noise/activity in its area of coverage.
No doubt this opportunity will be missed, but I see no reason why a similar set-up could not be introduced as an industry standard with AFDD's.

Whether a separate instrument (that works universally with all makes), or an output that would work with a simple multi-meter, would at least give sparky's half a chance of fault finding with these devices.
 
For that matter arcing gives out radio frequencies, just get a "listener" that picks them up and alarm sounds and remote switch??? something like that anyway. Beleive it or not @Sisyphus I looked at those videos and while I told @Cookie not to tell us there are bad men out there and AFDD are bad I didn't tell you so you get a pass on that one.
I can only conclude with a strategy. If you face a giant you don't go for its head you go for its feet. What is the feet of corporation I hear you ask...why it is the consumer. Therefore it would behove us to inform the consumer that AFDD have some questions that need answering before we feel confident enough to recommend them. If all the electricians did this and left the decision up to the consumer we could write on the certificate the client declined the AFDD offered. As well we could ensure that we price them unattractively, say £200 an AFDD. Given that we would need to fit one on every circuit that would add several hundred pounds to the cost of a consumer power distribution unit. As I retire next year (God willing!) I have little to lose in informing consumer associations as well. I reckon the above would effectively throw a spanner in the works, no?
 
For that matter arcing gives out radio frequencies, just get a "listener" that picks them up and alarm sounds and remote switch??? something like that ....
a) I'm wondering if things have moved over in the "sticks" with good mobile phone coverage .
b) Or if Truckers still use CBs and big-dirty "linears-Boots-Power/Amps"
c) (We have a post elsewhere Higher power PMR radios upsetting RCDs.. close UP -Inv-cube-law (volume-signal has to fill))
 
Anyway according to the videos @Sisyphus posted arcing is not the problem, glowing connections are. It would seem arcing is not the problem at all. The guys seem to be credible witnesses and amply qualified although I have not researched and confirmed that.
 
a) I'm wondering if things have moved over in the "sticks" with good mobile phone coverage .
b) Or if Truckers still use CBs and big-dirty "linears-Boots-Power/Amps"
c) (We have a post elsewhere Higher power PMR radios upsetting RCDs.. close UP -Inv-cube-law (volume-signal has to fill))
He speaks in parables:)
 
For that matter arcing gives out radio frequencies, just get a "listener" that picks them up and alarm sounds and remote switch??? something like that anyway. Beleive it or not @Sisyphus I looked at those videos and while I told @Cookie not to tell us there are bad men out there and AFDD are bad I didn't tell you so you get a pass on that one.
I can only conclude with a strategy. If you face a giant you don't go for its head you go for its feet. What is the feet of corporation I hear you ask...why it is the consumer. Therefore it would behove us to inform the consumer that AFDD have some questions that need answering before we feel confident enough to recommend them. If all the electricians did this and left the decision up to the consumer we could write on the certificate the client declined the AFDD offered. As well we could ensure that we price them unattractively, say £200 an AFDD. Given that we would need to fit one on every circuit that would add several hundred pounds to the cost of a consumer power distribution unit. As I retire next year (God willing!) I have little to lose in informing consumer associations as well. I reckon the above would effectively throw a spanner in the works, no?


Yes it's a prevalent strategy here Vortigern...slow a process as it may be....

Our consumer protective agencies being no help at all.....


Anyway according to the videos @Sisyphus posted arcing is not the problem, glowing connections are. It would seem arcing is not the problem at all. The guys seem to be credible witnesses and amply qualified although I have not researched and confirmed that.

Absolutely.

Arcing is the end result of heated connections , which are incendiary

a daily affair for most sparks here.....

o.jpg


Which brings us to simple 'point of use' thermal dynamics, something your ring circuits addressed how long ago???


But i digress, the widget exists....looks like a big wirenut....OR can be incorporated into electrical outlets

The patent war over it is HUGE, as well as international, the AFDD manufactures want to either own it, or silence it

~S~
 
What widget exists? What are you referring to here? Your posts are like riddles sometimes.

And if arcing is the result of heated connections, then surely a device which detects this arcing is a good thing? Note, I am not necessarily saying that AFDDs do this successfully, that is a different argument.
 

Reply to AFDDs are a massive fraud in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Page 337 cites UL testing, where arc resistance was found to be only 30 milliohms...
Replies
0
Views
739
Iv been given the scenario: 6 circuit earth fault loop impedance values were recorded. Each circuit has type B cb. referring to the maximum...
Replies
25
Views
8K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock