• Please checkout this (ad-free) update post I've done on a spare blog. Feel free to bookmark it and check everynow and again for update if ads are pissing you off. Always feel free to ad-block them for now though if you want. I'll let you know when you can disable the ad blocker again, only if you want to see the ads. They should look nice and neat in the end.

Discuss Upgraded db regulations in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
2
Welcome to ElectriciansForums.net - The American Electrical Advice Forum
Head straight to the main forums to chat by click here:   American Electrical Advice Forum

We have came across an upgraded db, the installation about 20 years old, and this db change happened this year.

The db as not been bought up to 18th edition regulations and just been swapped like for like.

We are carrying out a EICR on this db, I understand the db should off had a EIC but this was from another company. Would you code 2 all the non compliance with the 18th edition? No rcd on sockets and no rcd on lights within shower area, remembering the installation 20 years old but just had a new db.

Thanks
 

Risteard

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
4,140
The fact that the new work doesn't comply with the 18th Edition shouldn't affect how you code the observations - this is an assessment of the safety (or otherwise) of the installation. So once you've assessed the severity of the non-compliance then which Edition/Amendment of the Regulations was in force at the time really isn't relevant.
 

pc1966

Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
11,410
In my mind the whole point of the EICR coding is the danger, not if it matches current regulations or not.

I would follow the Best Practice Guide #4 for coding as it is a justifiable stance in all cases (so C2 for lack of RCD only if supplying outside sockets, etc).

EDIT: Just beaten by @Risteard !
 

DefyG

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
844
Does it count as like for like replacement / maintenance?
Might not have needed a certificate at the time.
Who knows what modifications have been carried out on the installation in the previous 20years (compliant or otherwise).
A replacement DB always requires testing and an EIC in my book, and Part P notification.
Certainly not as simple as changing a 'like for like' light fitting!
Not sure I've ever done a 'like for like' db change as there is always (or seems to be) some upgrade!
 

Reply to Upgraded db regulations in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

EICR installation 40 + years old… cabling PVC T&E… no MBPC… As stated fuses, all ELI measurements are ok… RCD separate from DB/CU 30ma, what’s...
Replies
2
Views
745
I’d appreciate your professional views on this question, as I’ve had 2 of the associated electrical bodies quizzed on this.!!!! ON changing/up...
Replies
11
Views
694
Morning guys, I would like some advice, currently at my workplace, I am replacing a DB and existing wiring in a warehouse. One of the ways feeds...
Replies
4
Views
635
Dear All, I was called to a villa following a fire incident had happened. the Indoor AC, wall mounted split unit was partially melted and had...
Replies
7
Views
507
Hi I always thought installations were safe at the time of instalment etc, the Distribution Boards at my works were installed over ten years back...
Replies
7
Views
514

New Posts (Please Reply)

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Top