I tend to use 16mm just because it's easier and I'd rather go too big than too small. I suppose it could be classed as laziness.
 
I tend to use 16mm just because it's easier and I'd rather go too big than too small. I suppose it could be classed as laziness.
Purely out of interest, and I'm not having a pop at ya, what's easier about using 16mm as opposed to 10mm? Personally, I find 10mm a whole loit easier to navigate around a CU.
 
Purely out of interest, and I'm not having a pop at ya, what's easier about using 16mm as opposed to 10mm? Personally, I find 10mm a whole loit easier to navigate around a CU.

You're absolutely correct, of course. I do indeed use 10mm. Don't know what I was thinking. :rolleyes4::rolleyes4::rolleyes4::rolleyes4::rolleyes4:
 
rivetting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
YOU SHOULD HAVE AN APPRENTICE FOR BRUSHING UP. :juggle:
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
As a point of interest - working the adiabatic equation backwards -

taking t as 0.1s and k as 115 as most modern domestic cases will be

a 10mm² earthing conductor is good for a Ze down to 0.06Ω and

a 16mm² is only good down to 0.04Ω .

It would seem that the 16mm² is very rarely required, if at all.
 
me too.
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Adiabatic Equation
Prefix
N/A
Forum
Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
45

Thread Tags

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
2glasseyes,
Last reply from
malcolmsanford,
Replies
45
Views
8,910

Advert