Caught out by mt own lazyness.....

[Doomed]

Did an EICR of a rented property, 2 up 2 down, old, one lighting circuit, cooker, ring and 2 radials (2 sockets in kitchenon one, hall socket on other).
All readings not to bad, not perfect I/R on kitchen radial, but damp walls so I wasn't surprised, end of line readings all good, realised that there must be loads of hidden joints on the lighting, so took readings at the furthest grond floor point and both ends of first floor.
Bonding up to date, but no RCD protection.
As rented recommended fitting RCD protection, gave landlord options and she went for a shiney new distribution board.
Came back, fitted it, retested all socket and cooker circuits and then got lazy..... as only the one lighting circuit checked the ground floor point I tested at last time as that had the highest reading last time and thoght jolly good, home time.
Silly me.
Two hours later called back when the tenant got home and tried to put the lights on upstairs - RCD trip!
After lots of hunting found a JB with the neutral and earth linked - AH HA I thought... - nope, take it out and no lights - upstairs missing the neutral - great, lifting boards and running a new feed 8pm at night with a moody tenant on my back.
Serves me right.

 

[Squid]

*goes to check landlord certs for property empire in Dorset........

 

[bigspark17]

Didnt you IR on eicr?

 

[Doomed]

Didnt you IR on eicr?

Yes, at the fuseboard, and that showed no issues as the neutral was not connected to the point where the earth link was - I would of only of found it if I I/R was done at the upstairs lights, which means I would be I/R ing at every light fitting during a test to find that sort of thing.

 

[Deleted account]

Yes, at the fuseboard, and that showed no issues as the neutral was not connected to the point where the earth link was - I would of only of found it if I I/R was done at the upstairs lights, which means I would be I/R ing at every light fitting during a test to find that sort of thing.

Surely the ir test would show neutral and earth Linked if tested at board.
It wouldn't have made any difference where you tested it. If the neutral and Earth are linked anywhere on the circuit it would of shown on testing at the board.

 

[bigspark17]

Agree with @Paignton pete neutral is continuous, a N-E IR would show this 100%! Do you test L-E only?

 

[Doomed]

As I said the neutral was broken prior to the join, therefore it did not show up, someone put the join in to use the earth as a neutral!

 

[mattg4321]

If it didn't show up on the IR test as you say, then how did it trip the RCD?

 

[bigspark17]

As I said the neutral was broken prior to the join, therefore it did not show up, someone put the join in to use the earth as a neutral!

Doesnt make any sense to me.

 

[Baddegg]

Doesnt make any sense to me.

I’m confused as well...Wouldn’t the rcd have tripped immediately you powered up?

 

[Deleted member 9648]

As I said the neutral was broken prior to the join, therefore it did not show up, someone put the join in to use the earth as a neutral!

But the earth must have been continuous back to the board so you would have got a reading L-E through lamps, or did you remove all lamps?....In which case why when a LN-E test is the way to go on an EICR?

 

[Toneyz]

Agree with @Paignton pete neutral is continuous, a N-E IR would show this 100%! Do you test L-E only?

Not if the light switches were not switched on when tested. Or the lamps removed.

 

[Toneyz]

Not if the light switches were not switched on when tested. Or the lamps removed.

There was a break in the neutral, the neutral was connected to earth on the load side of the break, therefore, the earth and neutral become a combined conductor back to the PME terminal.

 

[Toneyz]

See rough drawing

 

[Deleted account]

Like your drawing Anthony brag. Makes perfect sense, but...

In post one no mention of break in neutral. Just neutral and Earth connected.

In post 4 a bit more confusing, it says neutral was not connected where earth was linked. Not sure how to interpret that one.

Maybe wording not ideal.

Question to doomed, has anthonybrag got it right in his drawing. If so case cracked.

 

[Toneyz]

Like your drawing Anthony brag. Makes perfect sense, but...

In post one no mention of break in neutral. Just neutral and Earth connected.

In post 4 a bit more confusing, it says neutral was not connected where earth was linked. Not sure how to interpret that one.

Maybe wording not ideal.

Question to doomed, has anthonybragg got it right in his drawing. If so case cracked.

See post 7

 

[Deleted account]

Post 7 as I said neutral was broken prior to join.

I saw no mention of this being said in post 1 or4.

My reply was in post 5.

 

[Baddegg]

See rough drawing

Thanks for the drawing Anthony made things much clearer,I know I’m missing something here but why would the rcd only trip once the upstairs lights were switched?

 

[Deleted account]

Thanks for the drawing Anthony made things much clearer,I know I’m missing something here but why would the rcd only trip once the upstairs lights were switched?

When any switch is in the on position there would be Current through the residual current devices live, but no return feed through neutral as the return path would be via the cpc. I balance trip.

If all lights switched off no current through live and no current through neutral. Also non of the lights neutrals are actually connected to the neutral bar in the earth. No imbalance no trip.

 

[Baddegg]

Thanks Pete that makes sense, What’s confusing me is it only tripped with the upstairs lights when there is only a single lighting circuit? Not doubting anyone here just trying to keep up ha ha