Agree completely.......Single IR test on entire install,RCDs, and Zs to furthest point of each circuit to confirm disconnection times....main bonding must be included though. IMO these tests coupled with a CU change are completely adequate where cost is an issue, with an EIC clearly stating the extent of work,inspection and testing.

I almost agree ..... I would add an end to end continuity test of all circuits claiming to be ring finals and a Zs check at ALL socket outlets. Any rings found not to be continuous would be the subject of additional work. While theoretically a Zs test at all sockets will allow you to deduce that the ring isn't continuous the reality of measuring sockets which have been in use for while means you get all sorts of readings which don't allow the text-book analysis to work!
 
I came across this today:

View attachment 12175

Installed last year, no cert, no building certificate, no RCD's except the RCBO's for 2 circuits.

The best bit was a scribbled note saying that suspected dual suppply to the lighting circuits - which was true as I had to trun off 2 breakers to isolate the downstairs lighting circuit.

The icing on the cake - the insulation is falling off the cables!!

I do wonder sometimes.

Methinks you must have posted the wrong picture .... that MK board looks pretty standard to me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
I almost agree ..... I would add an end to end continuity test of all circuits claiming to be ring finals and a Zs check at ALL socket outlets. Any rings found not to be continuous would be the subject of additional work. While theoretically a Zs test at all sockets will allow you to deduce that the ring isn't continuous the reality of measuring sockets which have been in use for while means you get all sorts of readings which don't allow the text-book analysis to work!

I am not disagreeing but want to understand you so what is your reason for doing a Zs on ALL sockets?

I guess what I am asking is, if you have done end to end continuity then the basic ring is ok so your Zs will be checking socket fronts/switches and spurs so how far would you go fixing things before signing off the CU? A socket Zs slightly higher than expected or only if it was greater than the 1667 needed to trip the RCD? (which obviously indicates a fault but still allows the new board to operate correctly)
 
I am not disagreeing but want to understand you so what is your reason for doing a Zs on ALL sockets?

I guess what I am asking is, if you have done end to end continuity then the basic ring is ok so your Zs will be checking socket fronts/switches and spurs so how far would you go fixing things before signing off the CU? A socket Zs slightly higher than expected or only if it was greater than the 1667 needed to trip the RCD? (which obviously indicates a fault but still allows the new board to operate correctly)

I find the most common sort of DIY fault is an incorrectly wired socket outlet - perhaps a single to double conversion, a replacement or an added spur (illegal or legal!!). By testing each socket you will find those where the L&N is reversed (or worse) and (sometimes)where the CPC has been terminated on the back-box not the accessory, and maybe those where there might be a loose wire. And yes, I've come across all those faults, as I'm sure you have too.

Yes, this is beyond the scope of the CU change, but my philosophy is that I want to leave the house at least as safe as I found it, and ideally safer, so this is a little bit of "value add" which has become part of my regular service.

Like others here my 'standard' fee for a CU upgrade is £350 provided any upgrade to tails & earth is reasonably straight forward. On my quote I always make it clear that upgrade to main bonding if required is extra, and if I know from the pre-work survey its a pig to do I will do it the day before the CU change.

I never book another job the same day as a CU upgrade. If I get one done in 6 hours, complete with testing, then I get an early bath. More often its a full day's work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I find the most common sort of DIY fault is an incorrectly wired socket outlet - perhaps a single to double conversion, a replacement or an added spur (illegal or legal!!). By testing each socket you will find those where the L&N is reversed (or worse) and (sometimes)where the CPC has been terminated on the back-box not the accessory, and maybe those where there might be a loose wire. And yes, I've come across all those faults, as I'm sure you have too.

Yes, this is beyond the scope of the CU change, but my philosophy is that I want to leave the house at least as safe as I found it, and ideally safer, so this is a little bit of "value add" which has become part of my regular service.

Like others here my 'standard' fee for a CU upgrade is £350 provided any upgrade to tails & earth is reasonably straight forward. On my quote I always make it clear that upgrade to main bonding if required is extra, and if I know from the pre-work survey its a pig to do I will do it the day before the CU change.

I never book another job the same day as a CU upgrade. If I get one done in 6 hours, complete with testing, then I get an early bath. More often its a full day's work.

Thanks, that makes a lot of sense to me. I know what you mean about the time problem. I'd love to be able to guarantee time for something else in the afternoon but I don't work that fast and there is always something that causes delays.
 
Been doing an EICR today, a "full" one meaning I've tested each circuit individually for IR, each ring for continuity and each radial too.

One ring didn't have continuity on the neutral - I found the problem and fixed it.

I fear any attempts to cut out thorough testing will lead us down the path of more rushed, half done jobs, which will do the profession damage.
 
I am not disagreeing but want to understand you so what is your reason for doing a Zs on ALL sockets?

I guess what I am asking is, if you have done end to end continuity then the basic ring is ok so your Zs will be checking socket fronts/switches and spurs so how far would you go fixing things before signing off the CU? A socket Zs slightly higher than expected or only if it was greater than the 1667 needed to trip the RCD? (which obviously indicates a fault but still allows the new board to operate correctly)

That will only prove that there IS a ring, maybe within a ring. The main ring could be broken somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread Information

Title
Installing a new Cu - A Modest Proposal
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
27

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
sparc,
Last reply from
Guitarist,
Replies
27
Views
3,467

Advert