Discuss Zdb before dead tests. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

As westward points out it is the Zs of the distribution circuit. There is no BS7671-defined term "Zdb" so I would agree that it shouldn't be used.
 
I think common sense is called for here. ............. its distinctly lacking in BS 7671

If you refer to a Zs - its the end of a circuit
If you refer to a Zbd - its obvious its at a sub board

So maybe it should be called a ZeZdb

:)
 
I think common sense is called for here. ............. its distinctly lacking in BS 7671

If you refer to a Zs - its the end of a circuit
If you refer to a Zbd - its obvious its at a sub board

So maybe it should be called a ZeZdb

:)
Or Impedance at the DB Or more sensibly Zdb, what on earth is the argument for, after all it may not be a regulation but Z db makes sense to me
 
I think common sense is called for here. ............. its distinctly lacking in BS 7671

If you refer to a Zs - its the end of a circuit
If you refer to a Zbd - its obvious its at a sub board

So maybe it should be called a ZeZdb

:)
No Zs.
 
I agree but not a abbreviation I ever quote. I believe it has been adopted where a true value of Ze cannot be established due to operational restrictions and the value is often referred to as Zdb which although often quoted is not a recognised abbreviation.
Yes, with main earth conductor in situ , plus all parallel paths connected.
 
I agree but not a abbreviation I ever quote. I believe it has been adopted where a true value of Ze cannot be established due to operational restrictions and the value is often referred to as Zdb which although often quoted is not a recognised abbreviation.
Yes, with main earth conductor in situ , plus all parallel paths connected.
 
Only Z’s I’m thinking of! (Yawn)
04725248-DF4E-4E5A-A938-398BC6D9FEFC.jpeg
 
How does that work say for a garden shed that you intend to TT?
You will have a Zs for that distribution circuit, and the Zs for the final circuits fed from it will have no correlation with that (ignoring the fact that the phase (or line as it is called now) is common).
 

Reply to Zdb before dead tests. in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi All New to this forum, have read the posts on here from google but only recently signed up. I'm having some issues and some input would be...
Replies
13
Views
1K
Hi - just after thoughts on this please. I've been doing some testing on a 20 year old MCC. On the original EIC, Ze was reported as 0.04 R, PFC...
Replies
18
Views
2K
I got a TEXT message (i dont know them and i cant find out who they are from the phone number) "Hi speaking from Indeed Are you available to give...
Replies
15
Views
880
Hi, firstly appologies if my terminology is wrong but I know very little about electrics and have no idea why this is happening - I have 2...
Replies
4
Views
402
Hi all, After some options/opinions on fault finding N/E fault on ring final as fairly newish to being out alone. Customer wants to upgrade from...
Replies
7
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock