Discuss fuseboard change in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

well obvouisly i havent done that my original qiestion has been blown all out of proprtion FORGET IT u all seem to act like politicians ,

Son settle down. Do you want to hear this as I think this is what you want us to say.

If you can't isolate the circuit then look at a previous PIR, see what is written down and write someting similar, perhpas a couple of points different. If there isn't a previous PIR, then you make one up and put that on the Certifiacate.

Well I hope that no one on here is going to tell you that! as that is negligence, but in the same breath I will not say that this sort of thing does not happen, it does, the same as PAT is normally a farce with companies making operatives test 300+ items a day, it's a sticker putting on operation.

If you can't isolate the circuit, if you can't arrange to do the test out of hours, then you have to mark it a limitation, as said before the more limitations the less value the document is, but if you can't test the circuit then you can't. If your company are telling you that you can't set this type of limitations, then your between a rock and a hard place. You and only you can decide what you have to do. Sign a sheet that you know is negligent, or do what is morally right and stand your ground. No one on here can decide for you.
 
Hi,

In addition to what Malcolm has said.

If you are doing a PIR, there is no requirement for a measurement of R1 + R2. There is a requirement to confirm continuity of protective conductors - which you can do using the wander lead method.

I would only measure R1 + R2 if I needed this measurement to determine my Zs (rather than measuring Zs), by adding it to my measured Ze.
If you can't isolate the installation, then you can't measure Ze, so this method of determining Zs wouldn't be possible to you either.

No point in trying to measure R1 + R2 on a 'live' installation - what do you need the measurement for.....what does the measurement tell you??

Better to measure Zs at extremity of radials and at socket outlets - this confirms the earth path and gives you your Zs figure to compare with the Regs/OSG.

Bottom line, mate, according to the EAWR you have to have a pretty good reason for poking around in a live CU, and measuring R1 + R2 wouldn't be one. IMO:)

The reason I said you don't have to fill one of the columns is because, on a PIR, you have the option of 'limitations' - if a particular test isn't possible for whatever reason, and you have the option of N/A - if a particular test isn't applicable to what you are doing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I honesty thought that in the amendment that is coming out they would have changed this on a PIR to exclude either the R1 + R2 or R2 requirements.

Most modern meters will give you your Zs at a socket and you can get the adaptors for BC lights. Ok other forms of lights, such as Hi bay will need to be Method 2, Even then you can find yourself 20 or 30 metres from the DB with a lead running everywhere. As well as having to open the DB cover to croc onto the earth bar.

As Wayne says on a PIR the R1 + R2 test is pretty poiintless if your meter is confirming a EFLI path.

I think it is time that the PIR tests where revamped, in what way I suppose is open to argument but putting the onus onto the sparks is an IET cop out
 
well ive been in this game 25 years and i do agree with wot you say but int it a bit much when it has to come to this,,its all money and figures numbers ect now..cheers anyway pal and sorry if i woz abrupt..but i aint gunna turn down 150 qid a test for 4 hours work, so i think i will go down that avenue,,
 
hi,new member here. when changing a fuseboard should i test and issue a test certificate when doing this job or only if the customer asks for one? and should i price the changing of the fuseboard and testing/certificate seperately?
arite mate realy nead ur test & inspection youl learn wot our colleges r worried about :cool:
 
yep coz thats how long firm say they take, so they only get paid for 4 hours labour so wot can i do. i no its a joke but this is how things are these dys time money time money time money. numbers and figures..wot can i say i have a dog to feed.
 
New posts

Reply to fuseboard change in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

I have a fuseboard change I need to do soon I’m putting in a FUSEBOX 7 or 10 way RCBO+ SPD My only concern is how I should run the pyro cables in...
Replies
16
Views
1K
Evening everyone… I’ve attached pictures for your leisure.. so basically the customer does not have any RCD protection.. 3036 fuseboard is in...
Replies
9
Views
416
Hi, I have just replaced an old rewireable fuseboard with a 10way consumer unit with rcbo's fitted. The issue i have is that when i connect one of...
Replies
19
Views
2K
Hi, I recently had an EICR done at my property which unfortunately was unsatisfactory. So the electrican advised a new fuseboard from BG General...
Replies
90
Views
3K
Hi all, currently doing a job at a house where there are 3 switches In the hallway to control the hall lights. All 1 gang switches, one at...
Replies
2
Views
557

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock