OP
bigbaddave
Even with the lack of a CPC on any particular circuit I would still be testing between L-E and N-E. When conducting IR tests it's called earth for a reason, we're not meggering the CPC, we're meggering the earth, ie. from the line conductor to the earth bar or MET and the same for the neutral conductor. What if somewhere on a circuit with no CPC the cable has been damaged enough through whatever means so that one or other of the conductors are in connection with an exposed or extraneous conductive part? Or what if there's a nice fat screw through the cable linking it to another circuit? In my humble opinion, there's a multitude of reasons why we should still be conducting the IR tests as required.
I totally agree. However testing L-Cpc and N-CPC doesnt test the lighting circuits does it if there is no cpc. L-N is the only test which can prove the condition of the cable in this case..