Discuss Killed a PIR, fluorescent lighting in the Lighting Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Pretty Mouth

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
2,833
Actually managed to kill 2 PIRs in succession yesterday. The first I got SL and N mixed up (who uses the black core of a 3C+E as neutral? honestly), which killed it dead, tripping the breaker in the process. Schoolboy error.

The second, well I don't feel it's 100% my fault.

The PIR I had been asked to change had stuck permanently in the on position, and the client had turned off the breaker until it was replaced. It was controlling 2 twin 6ft fluorescent tubes in a garage, so 280W of fluoro lighting. I replaced it with an Eterna PIR, which instructions state good for 300W of fluorescent lighting.

However, on re-energising, I had the same problem - the new PIR was stuck on permanently. You could hear a faint click 'on' when it sensed motion, and again click 'off' after the time delay, but the SL terminal remained live. I noted that the starter for one of the twin fluoros had gone, so the tubes were flickering indefinitely as they attempted to light up.

What I guess happened is the constant start up current due to the failed fluoro starter caused the contacts in the PIR to weld closed. Can anyone confirm that this is likely to be the case, or if they have come across a similar problem before?
 
Yeah, I guess so. I can't help feeling that starter failure on fluorescents is inevitable, and if it is that that killed the PIR, it should at least be warned against in the instructions.
 
The PIR is rated for 300W inductive load (fluor), does that include surge on start or just continuous loading? And if you are running 280W load off it anyway you are pretty close to the full rating. Personally, I would have looked for something with a higher rating just for peace of mind.
 
I think the welding bit may be correct on the PIR. It is definitely a problem with contactors of all kinds the inrush currents. Most manufacuturers give inrush current data. But notionally I think you are in the range of 10x to even 100 times inrush current. Even at the lowest estimate that's enough to nuke the delicate contacts in a PIR. Of course that would be times 2, maybe use a suppressor?
non-compensated ferromagnetic ballast - 10-15 x In for 5-10ms
compensated ferromagnetic ballast - 20-60 x In for 0.5-1ms
electronic ballast 30-100 x In for 0.5ms
 
Last edited:
The PIR is rated for 300W inductive load (fluor), does that include surge on start or just continuous loading? And if you are running 280W load off it anyway you are pretty close to the full rating. Personally, I would have looked for something with a higher rating just for peace of mind.
It just says max 300W for fluorescent load, no more info than that
 
I think the welding bit may be correct on the PIR. It is definitely a problem with contactors of all kinds the inrush currents. Most manufacuturers give inrush current data. But notionally I think you are in the range of 10x to even 100 times inrush current. Even at the lowest estimate that's enough to nuke the delicate contacts in a PIR. Of course that would be times 2, maybe use a suppressor?
non-compensated ferromagnetic ballast - 10-15 x In for 5-10ms
compensated ferromagnetic ballast - 20-60 x In for 0.5-1ms
electronic ballast 30-100 x In for 0.5ms
Thanks @Vortigern . I've not had to use a suppressor before, what sort of thing should I use?

Do you think that the fluorescent starter being defective would have worsened the problem (I assume the problem was the starter, as both tubes of the pair were failing to light up properly).

I have suggested changing to LED, although the max load for that is even lower, 200W max 8 lights.
 
@Pretty Mouth just google inrush suppressor. I imagine you are going to get a cycling of the inrush as the starter was not working but I am not sure that would make matters worse as the circuit does not finally excite.
Thanks for this @Vortigern . I had a read up on NTC thermistors, and while I now get the idea of them, I wouldn't know how to select one for this purpose, or what considerations there are for installation. For a low value job such as this, I'm not going to pursue it any further - they can have a manual switch instead! Cheers
 

Reply to Killed a PIR, fluorescent lighting in the Lighting Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi. I'm an I.T.. engineer with some outdated electrical experience. I qualified C&G 2330 17th edition about 15 years ago, but my only experience...
Replies
4
Views
784
I have a baffling problem with a newly-installed PIR floodlight and I'd like advice from the forum as to whether it's defective (and should be...
Replies
5
Views
518
I’ve got bad ballasts and am replacing the T12 fluorescent bulbs with Halco direct wire, double ended T8 LEDs. The fixture has 4Rapid start bulbs...
Replies
0
Views
589
I am looking at installation of an architectural dimmer, that is will supply 6 channels, with 20A circuits each (2400W ea). Our hall has can light...
Replies
2
Views
683
I design bathrooms and I'm wondering if it's possible to use the same ceiling lights supplied by both a manual switch and a flush ceiling pir...
Replies
3
Views
905

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock