Search for tools and product advice,

Discuss Main Protective Conductors - Continuity and Connection Verified - Sighting Clamp in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
24
Are there any circumstances when it might be acceptable to tick the "Continuity and Connection Verified" box of the Electrical Installation Certificate when there is no visual or physical access to the point at which the bonding (normally a clamp in domestic) is applied. If so what checks over and above the requirements for low resistance would be required and are there any references to this in any of the Regs/GNs?
 
i hope you mean EICR, not EIC. because on a EIC, you will have installed the bonding and ensured it is accessible. on a EICR, i would be inclined to enter LIM in the box, with a n ote in the comments section that connection was verified by measurement.

edit: unless you mean a EIC for additional works carried out.
 
i hope you mean EICR, not EIC. because on a EIC, you will have installed the bonding and ensured it is accessible. on a EICR, i would be inclined to enter LIM in the box, with a n ote in the comments section that connection was verified by measurement.

edit: unless you mean a EIC for additional works carried out.
Yes I did mean EIC. I am referring to an addition or alteration where the bonding is already there.
 
yeah, only thought of that after i had pressed the enter button. if the client don't want to pay to upgrade the bonding, then make sure you note on your cert. that it is undersized.
 
ah. just me got confused with t'other thread. note that it's inaccessible but that connection has been verified by resistance measurement to the pipework.
 
Just for your info, the situation you describe is covered on p35 of GN3, "Testing bonding conductors & earthing conductors", As Tel has said, look for low resistance (circa 0.05ohms), between two points e.g. metallic pipes.
 

Reply to Main Protective Conductors - Continuity and Connection Verified - Sighting Clamp in the Periodic Inspection Reporting & Certification area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi there, Just a quick question. Does a main protective bonding conductor require UV protection when run outside? I am under the impression that...
Replies
3
Views
715
Hi everyone Ive just had an electrical condition report conducted on a mixed-use property, and I am extremely surprised that after the last report...
Replies
11
Views
2K
Hope i find someone who can help me with this one. I have this question on an exam: A continuity test on a protective bonding conductor gives a...
Replies
7
Views
5K
Over the last few days, I have stumbled across a number of threads that seem to point to a prevalent misunderstanding. Either that, or I have been...
Replies
6
Views
2K
Evening all, Recently started working for a company carrying out electrical installations - I've found a job today that didn't have any bonding...
Replies
8
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock