As it has a closer I suspect it is an escape route. But why worry about the wiring with a flat screen TV mounted above the door? I'd worry more about that falling on my head as a fireman..
Would some metal conduit clamps over the plastic above the door be enough to be compliant?
As it has a closer I suspect it is an escape route. But why worry about the wiring with a flat screen TV mounted above the door? I'd worry more about that falling on my head as a fireman..
Would some metal conduit clamps over the plastic above the door be enough to be compliant?
Steel saddles are a solution and easy to retrofit.
You would be pushed to find any door which would not be part of an escape route in a commercial premises.
I don't get it, there is a KO box in the wall and a surface pattress over the top as long as the KO box is earthed I don't see a problem. Why would it need containment between the two?
Why does it need containment out of interest? You wouldn't put containment between a flush box and thermostat/programmer back plate for example IMO its a similar scenario.
Why does it need containment out of interest? You wouldn't put containment between a flush box and thermostat/programmer back plate for example IMO its a similar scenario.
The conductors stop at the accessory and are contained within the back box. In this instance although as I said being picky they pass between enclosures . Would you butt up two conduit terminal boxes through a thin partition without some forms of bush. I agree in this instance it is an air space but it is that space where containment is absent.
Give me an instance where a door may not be an escape route. If you have passed through it there may be a requirement for you to pass back through it an emergency situation, even the door to a toilet cubicle. You are sitting on the loo and the fire alarm goes off that cubicle door is your escape route, far fetched but true.
Hi - my 20p worth - aim is to create one containment, consisting of the original back box, the new pattress and the face plate. If successful no additional segregation or containment would be required. The new containment would need to be rigidly joined and pass IP-wise, which it looks like. Or have I misunderstood? (Prolly not enough unpickled brain cells left.)
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc