Discuss You couldn't make this carp up... Part Pee take inadequate you say in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

So why do we think it sky rocketed?
1667839034858.png

Was it actually the ever growing number of reasons to have to far too regularly change consumer units that caused far more work and hence the same cowboy factor having more effect on the stats?

I also wonder how they can plot a peak for 2009 without data, as it does change the shape of the graph.

For all I despise Part P and the madness of the current arrangements, and the fact they simply don't deter cowboys anyway and just make things worse and more expensive for the rest of us...... can it really be true that the less likely the work is to need someone on the competent person scheme, the safer the work will be?! Not sure I buy that....
 
I wonder if the rise and rise of people using their 18v impact drivers on consumer units has had anything to do with it
 
So why do we think it sky rocketed?
View attachment 103434
Was it actually the ever growing number of reasons to have to far too regularly change consumer units that caused far more work and hence the same cowboy factor having more effect on the stats?

I also wonder how they can plot a peak for 2009 without data, as it does change the shape of the graph.
I don't believe that graph is using the correct data or it is incorrectly titled as those figures from memory when I did some research around 2016 / 17 don't wholy relate to the fire stats that detailed electrical distribution fires when the argument was put forward for non combustible consumer units
For all I despise Part P and the madness of the current arrangements, and the fact they simply don't deter cowboys anyway and just make things worse and more expensive for the rest of us...... can it really be true that the less likely the work is to need someone on the competent person scheme, the safer the work will be?! Not sure I buy that....
Part P has only ever been used by HMRC for enforcement purposes
 
I don't believe that graph is using the correct data or it is incorrectly titled as those figures from memory when I did some research around 2016 / 17 don't wholy relate to the fire stats that detailed electrical distribution fires when the argument was put forward for non combustible consumer units

Part P has only ever been used by HMRC for enforcement purposes
To spy on sparks ?
 
To spy on sparks ?
Not just spy I know of a couple of guy's who were nailed for misdelaring their income as their Part P notifications and accounts didn't add up. They had notified some jobs on behalf of some mates and these tipped the balance although they earned very little or nothing from them HMRC didn't believe them and took them for the unpaid tax
 
Not just spy I know of a couple of guy's who were nailed for misdelaring their income as their Part P notifications and accounts didn't add up. They had notified some jobs on behalf of some mates and these tipped the balance although they earned very little or nothing from them HMRC didn't believe them and took them for the unpaid tax
Time to boycott Part pee and take a stand
 
Could be. Also, could be the housing boom for the 10 years prior. After watching property ladder type shows, everyone and their mum was renovating properties as a sideline to their main job. Lots of DIY going on back then.
I watched one of these house renovations shows a couple years ago where the person a DIYer was doing up the house and said he re-wired and re-plumbed the house himself including a new combi-boiler

Part Pee and Gas safe Don't apply to DIY
 
I watched one of these house renovations shows a couple years ago where the person a DIYer was doing up the house and said he re-wired and re-plumbed the house himself including a new combi-boiler

Part Pee and Gas safe Don't apply to DIY
The Gas Safe rules changed a few years ago to close that loop hole
 

Reply to You couldn't make this carp up... Part Pee take inadequate you say in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi - just after thoughts on this please. I've been doing some testing on a 20 year old MCC. On the original EIC, Ze was reported as 0.04 R, PFC...
Replies
18
Views
2K
Hi all, Been browsing these forums for a while, always great to learn a new way to skin the same cat. Anyway, cut a long story short, was an...
Replies
11
Views
637
Evening everyone, New to the forum, so just saying hello, Can turn my hands to most DIY jobs and have done so over the years - some electrics...
Replies
4
Views
573
Hello all, First of all I apologise if this is in the wrong forum, I figured the general forum may be the best bet :) Thank you for taking...
Replies
3
Views
529
Maybe I've just been lucky, but I very rarely have an issue with customers paying, the vast majority have paid straight away or within a few days...
Replies
33
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock