Discuss Measured Zs just over regs!!! in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

R

rob69

Can anyone give me the formula with ref to Appendix 14 of the regs??
Near the bottom of that page it says accurate calculation of Zs with
respect to load current and conductor temp.thanks
 
It's all in appendix 14.
 
The formula near the top is not applicable to the state ment at the bottom which quotes the use of "Ib" in gaining a more accurate calculation of Zs or am I missing something.
I have two final circuits a ring 32A at 1.44 ohms and a cooker 40A at 1.16ohms both over regs limits!
 
New or existing circuits?? If existing, then the wonderful cover all RCD will suffice.... Well that's seems to be the way of things in the UK now (Not mine i might add)!! If New, meaning YOU have just installed the circuits, then you'll need to rectify your cock-up to bring them both into ADS compliance!!
 
The NICEIC bloke picked me up on this last time I saw him, it was on a board I'd changed, existing installation, I'd measured the ze and added it to R1 + R2 to bunged the figure in the box for maz zs,and it was marginally higher, it was only because the cpc reading was too high, anyway, the zs reading at each socket was well under. He said I need to split the ring as it didn't comply.

I had changed every faceplate in the house and even rechecked them all to try to resolve the high cpc loop reading but didn't help.

He was saying that it would be ok on earth fault protection but not on overload or something then started going on about the time curves and tables in the back of the regs book.
 
New or existing circuits?? If existing, then the wonderful cover all RCD will suffice.... Well that's seems to be the way of things in the UK now (Not mine i might add)!! If New, meaning YOU have just installed the circuits, then you'll need to rectify your cock-up to bring them both into ADS compliance!!

Or reduce the OCPD rating? 32 down to 25 say.
Or supplementary bond?
Or change the type of protective device? C to B say.
Or change the sort of protective device? 3036 to 1361? Or 1361 to 60898?

There would be a whole host of ways I would go about remedying such an issue, including simply finding the source of high resistance and rectifying it, long before I would go down the route of installing a magical 'cure all problems' device such as an RCD! :D

That said, the wire by numbers guides don't cover such things, therefore they surely can't be allowed?!
 
May I suggest that if you have checked the cpc and its still the weakest (highest resistance) then the simplest method to reduce the resistance value would be to cross bond to another circuit, such as the cooker. There are other ways, but most require an electrical upheaval...
 
If you have RCD protecting the circuit take 3-lead Zs at incoming and then outgoing terminals of the RCD. You may be surprised what it is adding to your readings. I always record on EIC or MW what impedance the RCD has added to the circuit.
 
The formula near the top is not applicable to the state ment at the bottom which quotes the use of "Ib" in gaining a more accurate calculation of Zs or am I missing something.
I have two final circuits a ring 32A at 1.44 ohms and a cooker 40A at 1.16ohms both over regs limits!

Im presuming this is domestic, so we can safely say their 60898's with it been a 32... Now, what equipment is requiring you to use a C or D type MCB on the ring main? Cause you can't be using a B type, as it complies ... JUST.

Granted the 40A is over by 0.01 ... mr.niceic might be fussy, so follow mr.skeltons advice.

Me thinks you're looking at GN3 for your values as opposed to the regs though! And as we all know the GN3 results are adjusted as the regs are at normal operating temperature.
 
Given that he is inspecting and not designing he needs to apply temperature correction for unloaded circuits surely.
 
be OK when the byb comes out. if the readings are over the regs now, put the new one on top. it'll be heavier, thus making the readings lower.
 

Reply to Measured Zs just over regs!!! in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi there, I'm Currently doing my design calcs for my college project and doing the actual Zs calculation. Formula is Zs= Ze (or Zdb) + (R1+R2)...
Replies
1
Views
1K
Hi, I've just had some electrical work completed in the bathroom; I've recently refurbished the bathroom, replacing the old electric shower with...
Replies
39
Views
8K
Hi, I have a Victron Multiplus-II 5kVA inverter/charger with Pylontech US5000 batteries installed in my house along with a 6.8kWp PV array and...
Replies
12
Views
447
Hi everyone Recently I have come across an advert of someone selling Afdds C type and the person mentioned the need to sell because Zs was too...
Replies
16
Views
3K
Hi everyone Ive just had an electrical condition report conducted on a mixed-use property, and I am extremely surprised that after the last report...
Replies
11
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock