Discuss Prospective fault current in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

newfutile

-
Esteemed
Arms
Reaction score
388
During a recent inspection on a 3 phase board I have some MCBs rated at 6KA
And some rated at 10 KA .

The ZE is about 0.04 to 0.05 depending on phase , form my calculations this works out to 9.95 KA ( I can only measure single phase pfc)

On a consumer unit we allow 16KA if its backed up by a BS1361
Does this apply to a 3 phase board or will a lot of MCBs need changing?
 
Last edited:
My maths says you've got 5-6KA single phase if it's a single phase breaker
 
Mine does as well for a single phase fault ,but what about a 3 phase fault although it would have to happen very close or in the board itself , 1.73 is the factor usually given
 
One of us is missing something here. 6KA is effectively the minimum reliability for a CPD to handle in a fault situation. How is a 1ph device on a 1ph circuit going to suddenly encounter a 3ph fault?

434.5.1 Tells us that we need to consider the breaking current of a device at it's point of installation
 
I think you're over-thinking this one
 
There is a bit of a back story , 2 mcbs were found to supplying the same circuit, lucky they were on the same phase . But your right it made me think what would have happened.
 
What at does the Electrical Engineering community think on this subject ?
 
There is a bit of a back story , 2 mcbs were found to supplying the same circuit, lucky they were on the same phase . But your right it made me think what would have happened.
Apart from being forbidden by regs, in practice actually very little - the load gets split across them and as soon as an overload condition starts then they'll instantaneously all trip in a random order. I know this because years ago I set this up purely to see and find out!

But... bad, bad, bad........
 
I think the point of the question is this:

For MCBs where the local PSCC exceeds Icu, is it always valid to rely on the conditional 16kA Icc rating afforded by coordination with BS1361 or BS88-3 fuses, regardless of the system conditions giving rise to that PSCC. In this case, we might have EN60898 MCBs of 6kA rating, supplied and type-tested with a single-phase CU for 16kA Icc. Fitted here in a 3-phase DB, they are still OK with 5kA PSCC for a single-phase fault, but the bolted 3-phase fault current (estimated as twice the single-phase current) exceeds Icu; can we assume the coordination is still valid and that the fuselink still provides backup at the prevailing (possibly different) I²t value?

I think the answer is yes but one might have to check with the manufacturers or study IEC 60947 closely. FWIW the 2x PSCC rule of thumb tends to overestimate the current. We can see intuitively that for a 3-phase symmetrical fault we have one fuse and one MCB pole in series with half the loop impedance and 230V, while for a line-line fault we have two of each in series with the full loop impedance and 400V. Neither is more onerous than the 2x rule of thumb suggests.

How is a 1ph device on a 1ph circuit going to suddenly encounter a 3ph fault?

The SP device in this case is installed in a TP board, so a foreseeable type of fault would be one line conductor insulation chafing / melting into contact with a busbar of a different phase. It is harder to see how an L-L-L fault or L-L-L-N/E fault could occur though.
 
The SP device in this case is installed in a TP board, so a foreseeable type of fault would be one line conductor insulation chafing / melting into contact with a busbar of a different phase. It is harder to see how an L-L-L fault or L-L-L-N/E fault could occur though.
For definite anything downstream of the SPD isn't going to have a happy time with that but would it actually affect the device itself? I'm not so sure it would as it just becomes a parallel path.
 
my calculations deem it acceptable 230 divided by 0.04=5.75ka and 5.75ka x 2 =11.5ka i always double it for 3 phase even though its over the top. think 1.73 is the correct value which would give you a lower fault current
 

Reply to Prospective fault current in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi - just after thoughts on this please. I've been doing some testing on a 20 year old MCC. On the original EIC, Ze was reported as 0.04 R, PFC...
Replies
18
Views
2K
Hi all, I have a question regarding the breaking capacity of circuit protective devices. So, the breaking capacity rating of devices in domestic...
Replies
13
Views
3K
Hello all, I wonder if I can get some opinion on my deliberations on an old TPN installation with numerous 1P sub-boards wired up with 16mm T&E...
Replies
5
Views
1K
Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
I don't "do" solar, but I've been asked to comment on an aspect of a new domestic solar installation by others. There is no overload or fault...
Replies
7
Views
1K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock