Discuss ring design and voltage drop in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Thanks for that jamesbrownlive. What you say is making sense to me and i understand the logic. Your answer reminds me about the fact that resistance is proportional to length and inversly proportional to CSA. Will ponder this and try get my head around it in relation to how a RFC is constructed.

With Thanks
 
Well, i wouldn't of thought so i = p/u, least i hope not. Diversity cannot be applied during the design process/cable selection process, we have to select cable size according to the full load and after considering correction factors. Diversity is not a part of cable selection
 
kk i remeberr somewhere someone did say divide by 4 now .....

what is the sum you were doing a above too work out how many meters you could get?? what did m stand for? say 11.5v divide by what = what...... i like to know things inside out.....
 
Ive used both ohms law R = V / I and used the values of mohms per meter out of table 4D5 in BS 7671.


From the OSG 2.5 T&E has a resistance of 0.01951 ohms per meter, so R = 0.01951 times m (meters) that is

R = 0.01951 * m

Ive taken V as volt drop at 11.5V and I as 32A, the rating of the PD, giving:


0.01951 * m = 11.5 / 32 ohms law


or m = (11.5 / 32)/0.0195 = 18.43m ??


Using the mV/A/m from table 4D5 of BS 7671, we have a value of 18mV, therefore

(18*32*m)/1000 = 11.5V


or m = 19.96m ??

Ive got this all wrong i know i = p/u. Think my perceptions of how a RFC handles voltage and current is off the scale!! But now ive had a thought from a post earlier.

Is from jamesbrownlive's post above, pg2, and how you both mention about dividing by 4. It would seem logical that when considering a RFC's construction, we have to consider that as a ring the CSA is doubled and the length effectivly halved, which would reduce the resistance to 1/4 of its standard value of 0.0195 ohms per m, in this case that would become 0.004875 ohms per m. Recalculating we have:

0.004875 * m = 11.5 / 32

m = 73.7m
which now seems ample length of cable to construct an A1 ring

What you think?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course diversity is used during the design process/cable selection.
When else would you use it?
It would be a bit pointless applying it after you have designed and installed the circuit.
 
Widler has a good drawing for this. I think it’s in one of the sticky’s. It’s easy when it’s drawn out. (I’ve got to get this bloody PC sorted out so I can post drawings!)
 
open the window tony and launch it... im sure the forum could sponsor you new 1 as you a classy/smart contribuiting member.. tho grumpy
 
Tried both, they both work until it gets to this site, and then I’m back to “mobile crap” screen. PLEASE someone HELP it doing my bloody head in ! ! ! ! !
 
Sounds like your computer thinks it is a mobile phone, so the forum is sending you to the mobile site or vice versa.
Unfortunately I do not know how the forum does that (client or server) so can't help.
Usual things of clearing caches, directly typing the forum address in the address bar not using links/favorites. but you have probably tried all that. Make sure there are no spurious m's in the web address you go to.
Good luck
 
Ive used both ohms law R = V / I and used the values of mohms per meter out of table 4D5 in BS 7671.


From the OSG 2.5 T&E has a resistance of 0.01951 ohms per meter, so R = 0.01951 times m (meters) that is

R = 0.01951 * m

Ive taken V as volt drop at 11.5V and I as 32A, the rating of the PD, giving:


0.01951 * m = 11.5 / 32 ohms law


or m = (11.5 / 32)/0.0195 = 18.43m ??


Using the mV/A/m from table 4D5 of BS 7671, we have a value of 18mV, therefore

(18*32*m)/1000 = 11.5V


or m = 19.96m ??

Ive got this all wrong i know i = p/u. Think my perceptions of how a RFC handles voltage and current is off the scale!! But now ive had a thought from a post earlier.

Is from jamesbrownlive's post above, pg2, and how you both mention about dividing by 4. It would seem logical that when considering a RFC's construction, we have to consider that as a ring the CSA is doubled and the length effectivly halved, which would reduce the resistance to 1/4 of its standard value of 0.0195 ohms per m, in this case that would become 0.004875 ohms per m. Recalculating we have:

0.004875 * m = 11.5 / 32

m = 73.7m
which now seems ample length of cable to construct an A1 ring

What you think?

I think your not far off, you need to make a further consideration to load distribution and conductor temperature and your there.

Regards Chris
 
I use an (Ib) of 26A when calculating for an A1 RFC which would gives a maximum length of 98M.

It can be engineered further but I prefer to err on the side of caution with 26A and (Ct) of 1.
 
Hi spinlondon, i never been taught to use diversity with cable selection. That doing so is is a definite no no. Diversity is applied to maximum demand to give a practical/realistic expectation of the current being drawn off he supply and hence through the service fuse at any one time.
 
Cheers chris. Im trying to get my head around load distribution and the calculations.
Get what you say about conductor temperature.
I've done the calculation without any correction and method C to keep things as simple as possible
 
Hi spinlondon, i never been taught to use diversity with cable selection. That doing so is is a definite no no. Diversity is applied to maximum demand to give a practical/realistic expectation of the current being drawn off he supply and hence through the service fuse at any one time.
Consider then a RFC with 10 socket-outlets.
What CSA of cable would your method indicate, and what rating of CPD would be required?
 
That is how I work out the length and volt drop in a Ring.

Length

2.5mm T&E ring.
1 conductor 2.5mm CSA @ 7.41mohm/m
1 conductor 1.5mm CSA @ 12.10mohm/m
{from page 166 OSG}

so if you have a measured value of say

r1 @ 0.58/7.41 x 1000 = 78.27m
rn @ 0.58/7.41 x 1000 = 78.27m
r2 @ 0.96/12.10 x 1000 = 79.33m

Volt Drop

Divide the length by 4 = 19.57 x 18 x 26/ 1000 = 9.16v

Bs 7671 pg 258, 6.1 correction for operating temp.

This calculation give you a ct of .923, x 9.16 = 8.45v

or

4 x 8.45v x 1000/26/18 = 72.22 / .923 = 78.24m

It assumes 20 amp at the furthest point and 12 amp distributed evenly around the ring so,

average = (32 + 20)/2 = 26 which is the value that Lenny posted.
 
Last edited:

Reply to ring design and voltage drop in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hello, New trainee electrician so sorry if this is a dumb question I feel confident with calculating the volt drop for a ring and radial circuit...
Replies
2
Views
2K
Hi, go easy on me please, I've just returned to the trade, well I am about to, I received my Gold Card last Thursday. I've been gen'ing up for a...
Replies
4
Views
886
Why is this still a thing, just done a quick calculation with the TLC volt drop calculator and if its a non lighting circuit the recommended size...
Replies
3
Views
929
Please advise what I should test / check next. My usual qualified electrician who did all of the work here is in Ireland for 4 weeks and not...
Replies
45
Views
3K
Hello, I am a trainee electrician just starting to get into doing cable calculations. I understand them when it comes to a radial circuit but get...
Replies
5
Views
3K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock