Good points....I wonder how compliance with that regulation could be verified on an EICR? It would be very difficult to gauge the depth of an electrode without digging it up!

Simple, it's exactly the same as checking any other test results on an eicr. Measure the value and compare it to the previous test results, then you can assess any change which may have occurred.
After all one of the fundamentals purposes of carrying out tests and recording the results is to identify changes and trends in changes of the results in order to predict and prevent failures and identify maintainence requirements.
 
If the value of the Ze is above the 200 ohms set by the guidelines but below the maximum permitted value of 1667,ensuring additional protection is correctly installed and operational (RCD) and thus compliant, the installation is perfectly safe to use.

I think a C3 would be reasonable code to note on the EICR. As a value greater than 200 would in theory require further investigation to ascertain stability.

One way to achieve this would be to test the Ze over a period of time under different environmental conditions and then compare the results. I doubt any of us would be in a position to do such monitoring, let alone the cost of such.
So one simple less costly solution would be to install additional rods... to try and achieve a value much less than 200 ohms.
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

Email
Joined
Time zone
Last seen

Thread Information

Title
TT High Zs
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
42

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
paulk11,
Last reply from
David M,
Replies
42
Views
5,349

Advert