Discuss Second Opinion on Modification to Existing Circuit in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
324
Came into work today with a fairly urgent requirement to install an instant hot water handwash unit in a small commercial kitchenette/servery - circa 2.8kw. Of course, it's in a right difficult area.

As the handwash is over 2kW, I'd ideally like to follow OSG advice and give it it's own circuit. However, pulling new cables back to the "local" DB isn't really viable with the timescale I have, so I've had a look at what exists at present and I have a few options. None of them will be perfect and I'm struggling to establish the best / safest - or indeed a concrete reason to pick none of them, so wondered if I could put my thoughts out there.

The entire thing has been terribly designed from the outset. There's just one twin socket present that runs the pannini press (2.8kw) and the milk chiller. This is just a 20a radial - don't intend to touch this as it's already got some significant load on it and I've discovered it seems to have been wired by someone with their teeth and in SY which looks like it's 1.5.

The only other circuit - also wired in SY - is a 6mm radial to a 32a socket. The 32a socket has a flylead in 4mm flex, adapting it down to a single 13a socket where it runs a coffee machine (again 2.8kW)....so I figured this would be the most likely contender to alter

I considered terminating the SY using a proper gland (even though I'd rather not use the stuff as it's entirely inappropriate) into a glav knockout box and creating a "hybrid" or "lollipop" RFC back to the 6mm - or indeed a 4mm radial from this point to supply a single socket for the coffee machine, and then an FCU for the handwash

It just feels wrong - because it won't be a standard circuit - but in my head I know it will be perfectly safe. I don't like the SY but my hands are a bit tied with this one.

Am I worrying over nothing? Currently doing my NVQ so having a slight heightened awareness here....

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As the handwash is over 2kW, I'd ideally like to follow OSG advice and give it it's own circuit.

Wherabouts in the OSG does it say this? I rarely use the OSG for anything and am interested as that's not mentioned in the regulations.

Ignoring the OSG for a minute the regulations only make a recommendation that loads over 2kW be on a dedicated circuit rather than a ring final circuit. There's nothing to say that each apllimace should have it's own circuit, just that the circuit should be dedicated to the aplliance(s) rather than being a general use circuit.

If that 32A socket is not required then it could be removed and that circuit turned into a standard 32A radial to feed the 2 appliances.

This only leaves the issue of the SY cable which would be up to you as the person who has actually seen it and how it is installed to decide what is best.
 
Aren't we getting all European with our 'Dedicated' Circuits for individual appliances, where over there its regulation to install everything on its own individual circuit and have it all labelled nicely on the consumer unit with pretty little pictures.
 
Wherabouts in the OSG does it say this? I rarely use the OSG for anything and am interested as that's not mentioned in the regulations.

Ignoring the OSG for a minute the regulations only make a recommendation that loads over 2kW be on a dedicated circuit rather than a ring final circuit. There's nothing to say that each apllimace should have it's own circuit, just that the circuit should be dedicated to the aplliance(s) rather than being a general use circuit.

If that 32A socket is not required then it could be removed and that circuit turned into a standard 32A radial to feed the 2 appliances.

This only leaves the issue of the SY cable which would be up to you as the person who has actually seen it and how it is installed to decide what is best.

As you imply - it isn't in the OSG. This was an error on my part having been through it last night. I think it's in an appendix of the brown book - but as you say, it is just a reccomendation. I just try to make sure any work I do takes the 'reccomendations' into account. There was a small RFC going around the seating area - I would have considered making an engineering judgement and breaking into this, espescially considering the occasional load of the instant water heater - however the shopfitters have already loaded it up with 3 heated displays so I wasn't happy.

I think as you say, my intention was to modify the existing 32a radial. However it becomes too complex. The datasheet for our Scolmore/Click sockets suggests the terminals can't take more than 2x4mm or 4x2.5 - so I wouldn't have been comfortable putting 2x6 in to create a traditional radial - thush I was looking at creating a hybrid circuit. However, as you also point out, also the SY - my conclusion was that I wouldn't have designed and installed the circuit in this way - so I'm not happy taking responsibility for it. I do have the shopfitters EIC for it but I disagree with it - so all things considered I've designed a new 20a radial from a spare way for the appliance and informed them of the increased time required
 
Aren't we getting all European with our 'Dedicated' Circuits for individual appliances, where over there its regulation to install everything on its own individual circuit and have it all labelled nicely on the consumer unit with pretty little pictures.

Back to that days of BS 546 circuits around the house. 1x 15a fuse to a 15a socket etc.
 
What are the concerns with using the existing SY cable in this case? (I don't know much about the stuff, have only come across it a couple of times)
The majority of it complies with European DIN standards, not BS. Thats not to say it can't be used, just that we have to satisfy ourselves that it meets or exceeds British standards.

Also in a lot of cases the manufacturer states its a control cable, not a distribution cable - so theres the manufacturers instructions side of things.

In my specific instance the braid has been taped off and not connected to the CPC and not d9ne with a proprietary SY gland - so hasnt been installed correctly

That said ive never actually seen it installed correctly...
 
Isn't SY cable a signal cable or something ? only to used to connect up certain things like AC units, and not to used as a distribuition cable
 
In my specific instance the braid has been taped off and not connected to the CPC and not d9ne with a proprietary SY gland - so hasnt been installed correctly

That said ive never actually seen it installed correctly...

Even in industrial applications the braid never seems to be glanded correctly, with it cut off and both ends of cables shoved into stuffing glands.

I hope this is highlighted in periodic inspections - especially when only recently installed.
 
Even in industrial applications the braid never seems to be glanded correctly, with it cut off and both ends of cables shoved into stuffing glands.

I hope this is highlighted in periodic inspections - especially when only recently installed.
Yeah - its sods law that ive ended up coming back to this location - I posted a thread a few months back whereby I disagreed with the contractor installing this and was trying to code it. Despite everything we've said here it was quite hard to do...
 
Yeah - its sods law that ive ended up coming back to this location - I posted a thread a few months back whereby I disagreed with the contractor installing this and was trying to code it. Despite everything we've said here it was quite hard to do...

I half remember that discussion, but not the outcome. Surely at least one end needs to be earthed? I've never used SY in a professional capacity and have been briefly familiarised with its glanding as it forms part of the AM2.
 
Isn't SY cable a signal cable or something ? only to used to connect up certain things like AC units, and not to used as a distribuition cable
The problem.. with sy cable is that its not recognised by bs7671 although there are tables on line with current carrying capacity detail. We only used it for long runs on 24 volt access control and BMS . But you see it all the time used on Air con systems. that not to say its correct and when used outdoors water get into the cable on corrodes the braiding
 
Last edited:
I find it such an odd choice of cable when there's so many others - much more suitable - available.

In another area we have BMS guys working on the plant rooms at the moment. They seem to love it. Which I can sort of get because it is a "control cable". However they've used some on a catenary to a remote plant room - and it isn't UV rated. Their commercial spark also used it to make up the 32a flylead om CEEform to the site cabin. I just don't get it? Last time I did a flylead I used H07 due to its tough sheath, pliability and UV resisting properties.

The circuits in this kitchen could have just as easily been done with T&E.

I fitted the radial for the water heater today. The walls were a bit wibbly wobbly so I went for FP200 rather than trunking or conduit - I wouldn't have even considered SY so no idea why this guy did.

Glad I didn't adapt his 32a 6mm radial. Once I was up my steps I could see that he'd forced it under the metal roller shutter housing and wrapped a load of tape around it - in what I assume wasa bit an attempt to stop it feeling the effects of the roller shutter vibrating.

And just to add a bit of context this is in a school. Most regular schools don't have specialists employed as staff - so I assume this sort of bodgery is very much commonplace as it will all be getting approved by the "unskilled" Teachers / Business Managers at the lowest cost.

I got employed as the Estate Manager with electrical bias and inherited this rubbish.

For what its worth the more recent Council / Local Authority work is just as terrible

The VIR singles and MICC installed when it was built in the 60's however is all a work of art - except where it's been tampered with by the aforementioned ropey contractoes
 
And just to add a bit of context this is in a school. Most regular schools don't have specialists employed as staff - so I assume this sort of bodgery is very much commonplace as it will all be getting approved by the "unskilled" Teachers / Business Managers at the lowest cost.

I got employed as the Estate Manager with electrical bias and inherited this rubbish.

For what its worth the more recent Council / Local Authority work is just as terrible
In the college I attend all electrical work is carried out by a maintenance company.

Their work is nothing to write home about and I'm won't begin to describe how long they can milk the simplest of tasks.
 
In the college I attend all electrical work is carried out by a maintenance company.

Their work is nothing to write home about and I'm won't begin to describe how long they can milk the simplest of tasks.

Yup. Up until i started and built a team of general maintenance bods (think retired plumbers, a couple of young lads wanting to learn a trade who I've put on courses etc) rather than just "caretakers", they were using the council helpline for everything - broken sockets to a tap washer. The council obviously sub it out to the general maintenance companies. When I started I walked around with one of the maintenance subbies who was trying to diagnose a heating issue. I watched him declare that the 'cable here is the switch live so will be dead' - whilst I was thinking 'no, that has to be the perm'. And then watched him get a belt.....
 
Sy cable has its uses, it is of course screened so suitable for connecting motors to inverter drives where emc may be a problem.

i did once have a situation where I installed a machine using tough rubber cable.
the MD called me back and told me it was not acceptable and had to be done in ”armoured cable” for safety.
didn‘t argue, came back and changed it for armoured as that is what the customer wanted.
next day I got called back and had a roasting because he wanted “flexible armoured cable”
I told him that I have never heard of such a product and he showed me something wired in sy.
a bit of client education about the different cable types, involving a mallet and a knife, showed him that the sy was weaker than the rubber and nothing beats armoured cable for resistance to destruction.

put it back to tough rubber flex and got paid for doing the job 3 times!!
 

Reply to Second Opinion on Modification to Existing Circuit in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Hi there, long time lurker, first time poster here. Straight down to it.. A friend asked me to add some sockets and additional lights to a small...
Replies
0
Views
888
Howdy All, just after a 2nd opinion as i'm doubting myself. I went to a property to look at replacing the ccu, I noticed what I thought was a...
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • Locked
  • Sticky
Beware a little long. I served an electrical apprenticeship a long time ago, then went back to full time education immediately moving away from...
Replies
55
Views
5K
Hello all, I wonder if I can get some opinion on my deliberations on an old TPN installation with numerous 1P sub-boards wired up with 16mm T&E...
Replies
5
Views
1K
Hi all Some advice on this would be great. Due to wire a kitchen from scratch and in a pickle over the designing of the oven and hob circuits due...
Replies
6
Views
2K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Electrical Forum

Welcome to the Electrical Forum at ElectriciansForums.net. The friendliest electrical forum online. General electrical questions and answers can be found in the electrical forum.
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock