- Reaction score
- 16,671
True, but if not fitted there should be a risk assessment to justify it. Which I doubt happens in most cases.
My gripe is more about the stupid "18th edition" naming. You could argue that "17th amendment 3" makes sense for the metal CU that became a requirement then, but if calling it "18th" then what was added if it is not the SPD?
Absolutely. It just causes more confusion calling them 17th or 18th edition units. Doesn't help anybody. Sparkies don't need it, and the average DIY guy probably going to think his work is 18th compliant because it says so on the box.