Search for tools and product advice,

Discuss Problems with Axiom MCBs in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Reaction score
3
Hi, does anybody know what other brands of MCB (if any) will fit an axiom consumer unit? I need a C32 breaker but i cannot source axiom C curve breakers anywhere. The initial problem is my Plasma cutter trips the B32 breaker as soon as I touch the trigger, and i cant think what else the problem could be.
 
What sort of plasma cutter is it?
e.g. 3/8 " cut?

Axiom is one of the cheapest consumer unit brands aimed entirely at the domestic market that rarely needs type C breakers, and I'm unfortunately not aware of any source or anything compatible.
Some people find these units work ok, but I avoid them after having had two units with faults in a row.

Before entering a world of pain trying to modify the supply I'd try the plasma cutter on a different installation and prove the issue is the inrush current as you suspect.
 
What sort of plasma cutter is it?
e.g. 3/8 " cut?

Axiom is one of the cheapest consumer unit brands aimed entirely at the domestic market that rarely needs type C breakers, and I'm unfortunately not aware of any source or anything compatible.
Some people find these units work ok, but I avoid them after having had two units with faults in a row.

Before entering a world of pain trying to modify the supply I'd try the plasma cutter on a different installation and prove the issue is the inrush current as you suspect.
its a 40mm cut, ive just checked the manual and it recommends a D32 breaker, so im going to rip out the Axiom consumer unit and replace the whole lot with Hager
 
Remember that a D32 is unlikley to be suitable for a domestic ring circuit supplying general purpose sockets.

it MAY be suitable for a dedicated supply for the cutter but it would have to be calculated. This is not an arrangement that is part of the standard circuits Of the on-site guide.
 
Remember that a D32 is unlikley to be suitable for a domestic ring circuit supplying general purpose sockets.

it MAY be suitable for a dedicated supply for the cutter but it would have to be calculated. This is not an arrangement that is part of the standard circuits Of the on-site guide.
its only suppyling the plasma cutter and welder both on individual 32a sockets and both supplied by 6mm NYYJ from the consumer unit.
Im planning to use D32 for the 32A sockets (6mm NYYJ), a C32 for the workshop ring main (2.5mm T+E), C16 for the 110v transformer supply (1.5mm NYYJ) and B6 for the lighting. Unless anyone can see any problems?
 
Unless anyone can see any problems?
These changes could impact the ability of your installation to turn itself off within required disconnection times under fault conditions.
e.g. A D32 breaker will only turn off within 0.4s if the total earth loop impedance is less that 0.27 ohms, and no electrician would say over the internet that this is likely or can be assumed, in fact it's unlikely.
My house has a higher earth loop than that at the consumer unit before the resistance of the circuit.
While you have a good grasp of what is going on you need some testing doing.
 
Last edited:
A pertinent question is whether you have RCD protection for these circuits.
Without getting into it in depth this affects possible reliance upon RCDs for fault protection, and a new regulation since 18th about <=32A sockets requiring RCD protection.
 
A pertinent question is whether you have RCD protection for these circuits.
Without getting into it in depth this affects possible reliance upon RCDs for fault protection, and a new regulation since 18th about <=32A sockets requiring RCD protection.
yes, the workshop consumer unit is fed from the main house consumer unit via a 63a RCD then C63 MCB, and 16mm SWA
 
As much as I don't like relying on RCD for disconnection times, if you find you can't meet the Zs for a 32A D-curve (something like 0.28 ohm from memory but CHECK THAT) then having an RCD would allow you to achieve < 0.4s for L-E faults (the only ones where ADS is specified).

As this ought to provide over-current protection for the cable you should have no other worries so long as it is meeting voltage drop.

Having separate RCD for those circuits would make sense as well, as I suspect a high chance of tripping the whole house (or half of it) otherwise!
 
The one thing I wouldn't do is just bung a D32 in. This needs a sparks, and not a domestic-only one.

My top few questions if I was on site, considering the 'simple' option would be:
-What the Ze at origin is and Zs at the workshop are
-How the trip curves of a D32 in workshop and upstream C63 in house compare and which one would operate first, at what time/current
-Whether the Zs forces me into RCD protection for fault protection, which isn't good practise as RCD are much less reliable than fuses/breakers
-Am I happy about the RCD for fault protection (if required) being at the house, and the house also turning off in fault conditions.
-Are the cables sized correctly for an L-N fault protected by a D curve breaker
Or:
-Whether converting to fused sub-main for workshop, and fused permanent supply for plasma cutter was more appropriate and allowed me to stay within max Zs value of the OCPD, and have a local RCD for additional protection.
 
@pc1966 I didn't see your answer. I think we are broadly in agreement. (I know L-N faults don't have to meet disconnection times but at least considering them seemed wise)
 
-How the trip curves of a D32 in workshop and upstream C63 in house compare and which one would operate first, at what time/current
The answer is almost always "both at once, and when you least want it".

Unless both CU are from the same maker (e.g. Hager) you won't get selectivity information as manufacturers usually only give it within their own ranges (and even then, not always!) and with BS88 fuses or similar.

I would advise the OP to have some emergency lighting just in case it all trips and goes black when in the middle of doing something hot and dangerous. (Sadly not that sort of hot and dangerous)
 
@pc1966 I didn't see your answer. I think we are broadly in agreement. (I know L-N faults don't have to meet disconnection times but at least considering them seemed wise)
Very much so, but usually if VD met at MCB rating it will disconnect OK-ish. More of a worry if feed is fault-only and not overload then you need to check cable adiabatic for the worst Zs.
 
Last edited:
Looking at the Hager tables, they don't offer any selectivity between 32A D & 63A B, and for 63A C it is only to 0.48kA.

So my guess about "both at once, and when you least want it" appears to be true!
Yes, that is in line with my experience too. I've known 3 all trip together once in an extreme case involving a plumber and a mini-digger....
 
As much as I don't like relying on RCD for disconnection times, if you find you can't meet the Zs for a 32A D-curve (something like 0.28 ohm from memory but CHECK THAT) then having an RCD would allow you to achieve < 0.4s for L-E faults (the only ones where ADS is specified).

As this ought to provide over-current protection for the cable you should have no other worries so long as it is meeting voltage drop.

Having separate RCD for those circuits would make sense as well, as I suspect a high chance of tripping the whole house (or half of it) otherwise!
The RCD only supplies the outbuildings so not much of an issue if it does trip, and there is plenty of natural light in the workshop otherwise I would be putting emergency lighting in. Surely 6mm NYYJ is plenty for 32a even with a d type breaker? It's only a few metres of cable to each socket
 
The RCD only supplies the outbuildings so not much of an issue if it does trip, and there is plenty of natural light in the workshop otherwise I would be putting emergency lighting in.
Sounds fine then.

Surely 6mm NYYJ is plenty for 32a even with a d type breaker? It's only a few metres of cable to each socket
For overload protection then yes.

For fault protection it would also depend on the sub-board Zs which in turn depends on your supply Ze and the sub-main feeding that CU. Of course you can disconnect using the RCD to avoid the demanding final Zs value, but MCB are fare more reliable so I always feel a little uneasy going down that route.

Essentially your NYYJ R1+R2 would be added to your sub-main R1+R2 and your supply Ze and that total final circuit Zs has to be 0.28 ohm or less to meet 0.4s ADS (i.e. to hit the magnetic trip point at 20 * 32A).


Would you actually test your RCD regularly using the test button?
 
Sounds fine then.


For overload protection then yes.

For fault protection it would also depend on the sub-board Zs which in turn depends on your supply Ze and the sub-main feeding that CU. Of course you can disconnect using the RCD to avoid the demanding final Zs value, but MCB are fare more reliable so I always feel a little uneasy going down that route.

Essentially your NYYJ R1+R2 would be added to your sub-main R1+R2 and your supply Ze and the total final circuit Zs has to be 0.28 ohm or less to meet 0.4s ADS.

Would you actually test your RCD regularly using the test button?
I know it's not ideal but I can't see a better way of making the plasma cutter work, when D type is the recommended fuse. I've checked the welder manual too now and it recommends a D45 or D63, no wonder it occasionally tripped the B32. I never use it on more than 3/4 power so the D32 should solve that issue too.

I do agree with what you are saying, but if my supply Ze is high there isn't much I can do about it is there? I will get it tested but I don't think there will be a resistance problem over 30ft of 16mm then 10ft of 6mm surely? So if the total Zs is high it will be the supply so I'll be stuck using the RCD anyway
 
Last edited:
if my supply Ze is high there isn't much I can do about it is there? I will get it tested but I don't think there will be a resistance problem over 30ft of 16mm then 10ft of 6mm surely? So if the total Zs is high it will be the supply so I'll be stuck using the RCD anyway
There actually are things you can do. Fuses have higher max Zs values, e.g. a BS88 32 amp fuse max Zs would be 0.79 ohms. So if the total Zs is high best practise would be to at least consider if there are other ways to supply the equipment in order to allow automatic disconnection of supply to be via the over current protective device as opposed to an RCD.
But until we know the actual readings from your installation we can't really advise.
 
I will get it tested but I don't think there will be a resistance problem over 30ft of 16mm then 10ft of 6mm surely? So if the total Zs is high it will be the supply so I'll be stuck using the RCD anyway
Depends. If it is 16mm 2-core SWA then R1 = 1.15 ohm/km, and R2 = 3.7 so for about 10m that is 0.049 ohm. If 3-core then R1=R2 = 1.15 so R1+R2 about 0.023 ohm.

For NYY-J 6mm it is about R1 = R2 = 3.08 so 0.019 ohms for 3m.

Working backwards from 0.28 for 32A D-curve we have:
  • 2-core Ze max = 0.28 - 0.019 - 0.049 = 0.21 ohm
  • 3-core Ze max = 0.28 - 0.019 - 0.023 = 0.24 ohm
Both are quite low. If you are TN-C-S you might meet them (assuming your PSCC at supply is a bit over 1kA) but probably not if TN-S (and no way TT). Measuring the current workshop CU Zs & PSCC would be the best starting point.

As @timhoward has already pointed out a fused-switch for 32A is much easier to meet, but check the manufacturer's data on what fuse(s) are acceptable.

If there is no way other than an RCD for meeting disconnection then one option for higher reliability, not the cheapest, is to have a 100mA delay RCD on the sub-main supply and a 30mA 'instant' for the socket outlet. That way you would still disconnect in under 0.4s even if one RCD was faulty. However, depending on how it comes from your main house CU that may (or may not) be easy.

You don't need the usual additional RCD protection on SWA cable even if it is buried or hidden in plaster (assuming armour is earthed as it should be and it meets 5s disconnection) so if you have a non-RCD 63A C-curve feeding a separate RCD enclosure to feed the sub-main, you could change that for a 100mA delay and then have a 30mA one in the workshop CU for shock protection.
 
Depends. If it is 16mm 2-core SWA then R1 = 1.15 ohm/km, and R2 = 3.7 so for about 10m that is 0.049 ohm. If 3-core then R1=R2 = 1.15 so R1+R2 about 0.023 ohm.

For NYY-J 6mm it is about R1 = R2 = 3.08 so 0.019 ohms for 3m.

Working backwards from 0.28 for 32A D-curve we have:
  • 2-core Ze max = 0.28 - 0.019 - 0.049 = 0.21 ohm
  • 3-core Ze max = 0.28 - 0.019 - 0.023 = 0.24 ohm
Both are quite low. If you are TN-C-S you might meet them (assuming your PSCC at supply is a bit over 1kA) but probably not if TN-S (and no way TT). Measuring the current workshop CU Zs & PSCC would be the best starting point.

As @timhoward has already pointed out a fused-switch for 32A is much easier to meet, but check the manufacturer's data on what fuse(s) are acceptable.

If there is no way other than an RCD for meeting disconnection then one option for higher reliability, not the cheapest, is to have a 100mA delay RCD on the sub-main supply and a 30mA 'instant' for the socket outlet. That way you would still disconnect in under 0.4s even if one RCD was faulty. However, depending on how it comes from your main house CU that may (or may not) be easy.

You don't need the usual additional RCD protection on SWA cable even if it is buried or hidden in plaster (assuming armour is earthed as it should be and it meets 5s disconnection) so if you have a non-RCD 63A C-curve feeding a separate RCD enclosure to feed the sub-main, you could change that for a 100mA delay and then have a 30mA one in the workshop CU for shock protection.
It's 3 core and the armour is earthed both ends so should be pretty low. I think a fused switch is a good idea, I will definitely look into it. Supply is TNCS so hopefully won't be required but we will see.
 
It's 3 core and the armour is earthed both ends so should be pretty low. I think a fused switch is a good idea, I will definitely look into it. Supply is TNCS so hopefully won't be required but we will see.
OK, that is looking promising.

As a 32A socket outlet you need the 30mA RCD somewhere, just how it is engineered depends on the overall design. If it is at the sub-main feed already (as you said in post #10) then at the workshop you can use any very high-value breaker as a convenient means to feed the fused-switch while keeping distribution and overall isolation from whatever CU you end up with there. Certainly Hager or Schneider are good quality and they actually give to information to allow selectivity to be computed.

But...this is not how you would design an installation for this purpose!
 

Reply to Problems with Axiom MCBs in the UK Electrical Forum area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

I'm planning a replacement for my existing domestic CU and would like to have it sanity checked before I get an electrician involved. The main...
Replies
33
Views
4K
Hi All, I'm having an issue with an RCD tripping. I've run 6mm Hi Tuff from house to garage CU, run is no more than 10 metres. This has a 40A RCD...
Replies
5
Views
739
Hello everyone, I’m based in the ROI and live in a rural location. Yesterday evening my electricity supply started to switch on and off randomly...
Replies
2
Views
2K
My parents have been having trouble with their electrics recently. They had their house refurbished a year and a half ago and discovered some...
Replies
28
Views
3K
Hello, We live in an old stone built ground floor flat, built in the 1880s. Obviously the consumer unit and cabling has been updated a number of...
Replies
94
Views
13K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

YOUR Unread Posts

This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by untold.media Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock