Is that on a brick wall? If so it’s not a fire rest is it?
Certainly not more of a fire hazard than on a plasterboard ceiling imo, and most modern Class 1 lights use the ceiling as part of their enclosure so presumably they feel it's sufficient.
As already mentioned, 526.5 allows building material that is non-combustible to BS 476-4 but since that is no doubt £100 I'm not looking up whether brick or plaster is covered, though I'd expect it is.
If there was a hole through to the cavity there might be another argument - but then that is the case with most ceiling lights and even many pendants
[automerge]1601228255[/automerge]
I'd fix that on site and charge accordingly, not note it. But either the connection is tight and secure or not. We aren't coding workmanship.
No actually fire barrier,
the connections can be seen,when light is refixed.
I (and others I think) assumed the light fitting went over that hole and covered it, but if the terminal blocks were visible when the light went back on then we've been talking at cross purposes and obviously it's a C2 (maybe C1) and I don't think anyone here would argue otherwise...
Failure of earth connection @ light, danger of live @ fitting,causing shock hazard to persons.
Can't tell that from the picture, but no earth continuity at a Class 1 light is certainly a C2, don't think anyone here would say otherwise?
How can anyone actually say this is ok, it’s like going back to the bad old days.
Would anyone just leave it like this,C2 .
[/QUOTE]