Discuss Smoke alarm 3rd core, WHY ? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Also good practise IMO, local isolation for a moving part, maybe not regs, not sure about that will have to check, but in anycase good practise
 
Yet another stupid example of the regs.

The regs for fixed equipment like fans should read "local isolation by means of DP or 3P isolation must be installed within easy reach to allow the item to be isolated from the supply circuit" Particulaly useful for fault finding and isolation when performing IR tests.

I was doing fault finding on a lighting circuit on Friday and not 1 of the 3 fans had isolation - so I had to physically disconnect each one.

Not fitting isolators is bad practice IMHO.
 
Ah, fans and triple pole isolators, my favourite subject! :D

No......you need to go from the switch to a TP fan isolator then the fan.

Common - perm live at fan isolator (brown)
S/L - S/L at fan isolator (black....remember to sleeve)
Neutral - Neutral (gray......remember to sleeve)

Then wire from the isolator to the fan!

Failing that......rtfm.....or call a professional spark

Please have a read of this if you'd like to know more about the subject and why you are not required (unless the manufacturers specify to do so) to fit a 3 pole isolator:

http://www.electriciansforums.net/e...3-pole-isolation-source-much-controversy.html
 
I enjoyed the thread there Buddy, however totally confused by it, so are you saying a triple pole isolator is not required but isolation is? or is the post so long I cannot work out what is being said ?
 
Put simply, the only time a 3 pole isolator is required is if the manufacturers instructions specify that one must be fitted.

Every electrical circuit must have a point of isolation. Every electrical circuit can effectively be isolated by use of the main switch.

Local isolation is a made up term and is found nowhere in BS 7671. 'Readily accessible means of switching off' which does appear all over the BGB, is open to interpretation.


These are the main points I try to make in that post, is there anything specific you need clarification of bud?
 
Putting it simply a fan is a fixed piece of equipment and good practice says that you should always install local DP or TP isolation, plus fuse down if directed by the manufacturers instructions.
 
it might not be in the wiring reg's, but the building reg's says that "an extractor fan supplied from a lighting circuit for a bathroom without a window should have it's own means of isolation, as otherwise replacement or maintenance of the fan would have to be carried out in the dark. an isolation switch for a fan with an overrun facility will need to be triple-pole (switch wire, line and neutral), and must be installed outside of zones 0, 1 and 2."
 
Put simply, the only time a 3 pole isolator is required is if the manufacturers instructions specify that one must be fitted.

Every electrical circuit must have a point of isolation. Every electrical circuit can effectively be isolated by use of the main switch.

Local isolation is a made up term and is found nowhere in BS 7671. 'Readily accessible means of switching off' which does appear all over the BGB, is open to interpretation.


These are the main points I try to make in that post, is there anything specific you need clarification of bud?


Oh right, so theres no reg to state a triple pole is required but down to the manufacturer? however an isolation point is required? fair enough, I just like clarification incase an engineer who I may work with tries to tell me otherwise, I always fit a triple pole if a timer fan is used, or a double pole if it is a PIR fan, But I enjoy trying to get one over engineers, It doesn't happen very often though haha
 
it might not be in the wiring reg's, but the building reg's says that "an extractor fan supplied from a lighting circuit for a bathroom without a window should have it's own means of isolation, as otherwise replacement or maintenance of the fan would have to be carried out in the dark. an isolation switch for a fan with an overrun facility will need to be triple-pole (switch wire, line and neutral), and must be installed outside of zones 0, 1 and 2."

No it doesn't, what you have posted there is a direct quote from The Electricians Guide To The Building Regulations. This book is as it says... a guide. It is simply a book, written by an individual and is not statutory in any shape or form.
 
Last edited:
however an isolation point is required?

And that isolation point can be the main switch if you like! :)

The only requirement for 'local isolation' as some like to call it is defined in 132.15.2 which to summarise states that a fixed electrical motor needs a readily accessible and easily operated means of switching off. Well I don't need to tell ya that 'switching off' is not the same as 'isolation' :)
 
No it doesn't, what you have posted there is a direct quote from The Electricians Guide To The Building Regulations. This book is as it says... a guide. It is simply a book, written by an individual and is not statutory in any shape or form.

yep, i'll concede to that. even though it's non statutory it's still good advice, but i accept your point.

what i will say is that, whilst you may be correct about the lack of any hard and fast rules regarding isolators, as the installation designer i must make an assessment of the type of equipment that is being installed and who is going to be using it. extractor fans have permanent lives, motors and moving parts; there is every possibility that something could go wrong at a later date which would require a competent person to carry out repairs. it's not beyond the realms of possibility that these repairs might need to be carried out in less than satisfactory light conditions and because of this, i believe it's good practice to provide isolation from a point other than the fuse board.

also, it might be acceptable to use the mcb for isolation in a tn installation, but what about a tt? i'd want both line and neutral disconnected. it's obviously not ideal to isolate the entire installation, so a fan isolator is the perfect solution.
 
yep, i'll concede to that. even though it's non statutory it's still good advice, but i accept your point.

what i will say is that, whilst you may be correct about the lack of any hard and fast rules regarding isolators, as the installation designer i must make an assessment of the type of equipment that is being installed and who is going to be using it. extractor fans have permanent lives, motors and moving parts; there is every possibility that something could go wrong at a later date which would require a competent person to carry out repairs. it's not beyond the realms of possibility that these repairs might need to be carried out in less than satisfactory light conditions and because of this, i believe it's good practice to provide isolation from a point other than the fuse board.

also, it might be acceptable to use the mcb for isolation in a tn installation, but what about a tt? i'd want both line and neutral disconnected. it's obviously not ideal to isolate the entire installation, so a fan isolator is the perfect solution.

I absolutely agree, you're right, there are more than enough scenarios where fitting a 3 pole isolator would be the most reasonable thing to do. I have always stated that fitting a 3 pole isolator is often good practice, my only point was that it wasn't a requirement. The whole reason I 'took a stand' so to speak to the myth that 3 pole isolators MUST be fitted was because of the amount of hear say and rubbish floating around in the ether. People talking of building inspectors failing jobs because of the lack of 3 pole isolators, 'sparks' rubbishing other sparks work, people wasting time fitting both fuses AND isolators??? I just wanted to bring some clear, consise and accurate information to the table to clear the matter once and for all.

Personally, when fitting extractors, I rarely fit 3 pole isolators as most fans that I fit require fusing down so 9 times out of ten I fuse down the bathroom light and fan together, thus killing two birds with one stone. What you choose to do is up to you, and as long as it complies with regs, isolator or no isolator, I can assure you I wouldn't be rubbishing your work :)
 

Reply to Smoke alarm 3rd core, WHY ? in the Electrical Wiring, Theories and Regulations area at ElectriciansForums.net

Similar Threads

Not come across this before, so would like some help, please. I went to install smokes and heat alarm (to new Scottish regs) in a fairly modern...
Replies
2
Views
1K
I took a light down to put up a new fixture and now the light goes on but the switch doesn’t shut the light off. The power only stays on so I am...
Replies
3
Views
2K
Hello, I am renovating a house. I am rewiring myself. I am getting an electrician to install a new consumer unit & test all my work. I'm looking...
Replies
20
Views
3K
Hello, I had the floor boards up today and noticed that the ceiling rose for the room below, was wired with 3 singles. Probably the whole house...
Replies
8
Views
1K
Need some guidance please. I know that smoke alarms require a permanent live and neutral in order to operate. Is this also the case with...
Replies
19
Views
5K

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Pushfit Wire Connectors Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc
This website was designed, optimised and is hosted by Untold Media. Operating under the name Untold Media since 2001.
Back
Top
AdBlock Detected

We get it, advertisements are annoying!

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks useful features of our website. For the best site experience please disable your AdBlocker.

I've Disabled AdBlock