... well, a clamp is a ring ... therefore ... still way too small!

Not the clamp itself, the sleeve.. which is 10mmx0.5mm (approx)(so CSA of 5mm².. this is what the fault current will pass through. If the CPC was attached to the clamp in the usual way as it is with a BS951 then I wouldn't be as worried as there would be a much larger CSA for fault current to pass through as the current would utilise more of the clamp.
 
Last edited:
Oh Richard!!!!

Well if copper is rated at 100% (because Copper is the standard by which electrical materials are rated), and we take steel as 15 (I'm being optomistic as it 3-15%) then steel is only 3/20 as conductive as copper.

If the clamp is 10mm x 0.5 it has a csa of 5mm.

5mm x (3/20) = 0.7mm (equivalent of copper)..

In otherwords 'way too small'!!

Of course thats all far too simplistic and ignoring many other factors that I dont understand.. A clamp MUST be a better conductor than 3/20 of copper otherwise we wouldn't use them as a bonding clamp!
k1/k2 * S
k1 for copper is 143, k2 for steel is 51, S= 3.63mm²
so S for steel needs to be (143/51)*3.63 = 10mm², you only have 5mm² (approx)

Hope they actually do something about it.
 
Thanks Richard..

Of course!! I'd only just been looking at table 54.2!

I've never used the K factor for steel before.. and there was me trying to be all clever with conductivity ratios.. just looking foolish really! :smile5:
 
Last edited:
Conductivity is for bonding conductors.
For a cpc you need to account for the short time of the fault and the high fault current to ensure they do not melt, deform, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Not the clamp itself, the sleeve.. which is 10mmx0.5mm (approx)(so CSA of 5mm².. this is what the fault current will pass through. If the CPC was attached to the clamp in the usual way as it is with a BS951 then I wouldn't be as worried as there would be a much larger CSA for fault current to pass through as the current would utilise more of the clamp.

There shouldn't be a cpc connected to the clamp at all!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The straps on those clamps aren't usually steel, they are normally tinned copper.
Hmm, not likely with the strain they need to be put under to screw them tight.
 
Hmm, not likely with the strain they need to be put under to screw them tight.

There's not a lot of strain on them, its a curved plate which sits against the cable with the band held against the back of it.
It's not a bs951 pipe clamp.
 
I had a loose TN-S clamp on a CU change the other day - so I got the DNO out and they said it was fine,
different rules for them and us I suppose!
 

Similar threads

OFFICIAL SPONSORS

Electrical Goods - Electrical Tools - Brand Names Electrician Courses Green Electrical Goods PCB Way Electric Underfloor Heating Electrician Courses Heating 2 Go Electrician Workwear Supplier
These Official Forum Sponsors May Provide Discounts to Regular Forum Members - If you would like to sponsor us then CLICK HERE and post a thread with who you are, and we'll send you some stats etc

Advert

Daily, weekly or monthly email

Thread starter

HappyHippyDad

Esteemed
Arms
Supporter
~
Joined
Location
Gloucestershire
If you're a qualified, trainee, or retired electrician - Which country is it that your work will be / is / was aimed at?
United Kingdom
What type of forum member are you?
Practising Electrician (Qualified - Domestic or Commercial etc)

Thread Information

Title
TN-S with a BS951 clamp and black tar covering supply cable?
Prefix
N/A
Forum
UK Electrical Forum
Start date
Last reply date
Replies
29

Advert

Thread statistics

Created
HappyHippyDad,
Last reply from
sam400,
Replies
29
Views
5,309

Advert