Another sad reason Part P just doesnt work

[DurhamSparky]

Vito you rambling on about crap mate!

nobody has mentions Fire Detection or Security! and as usual the believers and non believers will be in disagreement with the NIC and its ramblings as well..!!

Part P operators need not poke there golden noses in the land of Inspections...!!

 

[GLENNSPARK]

Sorry, it goes without saying all of the electrical circuits where accessable. i was referring to functionality and fire alarms.

even so....my question still stands vito...code or not....if code then what number?...

 

[DurhamSparky]

i know what i would code it!! and it would be followed by the big screw driver and GY Sleeving and loss of interconnection of units!

 

[Vito04]

Vito you rambling on about crap mate!

nobody has mentions Fire Detection or Security! and as usual the believers and non believers will be in disagreement with the NIC and its ramblings as well..!!

How Rude,

I was merely stating word for word what they say. We all have our own way of doing things as i mentioned previously before we went off an a tangent. Mine is test 100% and on average sample 2-3 items per circuit (domestic) unless there are findings. Other than that i was just trying to make conversation on their reasoning. Seems like its time for bed

 

[DurhamSparky]

Agreed!!! me too...!!!

 

[GLENNSPARK]

still waiting vito...

 

[GLENNSPARK]

you`v been given a clue by durham vito....

 

[Vito04]

Hi GlennSpark,

Sorry i didn't reply sooner, by the the time i had typed out my last reply you had posted a couple more but unfortunately I needed sleep.


Thats a good question,

Would I disconnect the 9v interlink (cpc) wire and lose the link and risk the customer not being alerted in the event of a fire, definitely not, especially given rechargeable lithium batteries could run on standby for a couple of years without mains power.

Is it potentially dangerous?

uninsulated conductor could become live if it touches the live conductor with no earth protection. induced voltage with no connection to earth. Could someone tap into the cable to feed something else mistaking the 9v link for a cpc.

Code C2

I am sure this will differ from sparky to sparky

 

[GLENNSPARK]

Hi GlennSpark,

Sorry i didn't reply sooner, by the the time i had typed out my last reply you had posted a couple more but unfortunately I needed sleep.


Thats a good question,

Would I disconnect the 9v interlink (cpc) wire and lose the link and risk the customer not being alerted in the event of a fire, definitely not, especially given rechargeable lithium batteries could run on standby for a couple of years without mains power.

Is it potentially dangerous?

uninsulated conductor could become live if it touches the live conductor with no earth protection. induced voltage with no connection to earth. Could someone tap into the cable to feed something else mistaking the 9v link for a cpc.

Code C2

I am sure this will differ from sparky to sparky

agreed....c2

 

[jjnr78]

Some interesting points have been made but the most worrying is that a BC appointed contractor feels that it is sufficient to provide 30% test results on an installation that if it were own we would of course have to provide a complete test schedule. I'm writing to the Authority in question at their request and I hope this contractor losses the agreement.

 

[PC Electrics]

Some interesting points have been made but the most worrying is that a BC appointed contractor feels that it is sufficient to provide 30% test results on an installation that if it were own we would of course have to provide a complete test schedule. I'm writing to the Authority in question at their request and I hope this contractor losses the agreement.

Please remember to come back and let us know what happens